NameCensus.

UK surname

Bottomer

In the 1881 census there were 34 people recorded with the Bottomer surname, ranking it #28,837 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 90, ranked #32,202, down from #28,837 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Walsall, Bromsgrove and Sandwell.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bottomer is 106 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 164.7%.

1881 census count

34

Ranked #28,837

Modern count

90

2016, ranked #32,202

Peak year

1998

106 bearers

Map years

2

1998 to 2006

Key insights

  • Bottomer had 34 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #28,837 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 90 in 2016, ranked #32,202.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 66 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Bottomer surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bottomer surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bottomer surname density by area, 2006 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bottomer over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 13 #30,970
1861 historical 20 #31,364
1881 historical 34 #28,837
1891 historical 35 #31,540
1901 historical 42 #29,487
1911 historical 66 #26,249
1997 modern 104 #26,351
1998 modern 106 #26,689
1999 modern 105 #27,035
2000 modern 102 #27,425
2001 modern 95 #28,101
2002 modern 100 #27,944
2003 modern 99 #27,871
2004 modern 98 #28,297
2005 modern 94 #28,973
2006 modern 102 #27,926
2007 modern 99 #28,852
2008 modern 105 #28,180
2009 modern 100 #29,597
2010 modern 105 #29,453
2011 modern 100 #30,058
2012 modern 96 #30,949
2013 modern 92 #31,909
2014 modern 94 #31,909
2015 modern 89 #32,325
2016 modern 90 #32,202

Geography

Back to top

Where Bottomers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Walsall, Bromsgrove, Sandwell and Cannock Chase. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Walsall 007 Walsall
2 Bromsgrove 002 Bromsgrove
3 Sandwell 002 Sandwell
4 Walsall 021 Walsall
5 Cannock Chase 007 Cannock Chase

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bottomer

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bottomer surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bottomer

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bottomer, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Bottomer surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Bottomer household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Bottomer is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Bottomer is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Bottomer falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bottomer is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bottomer, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bottomer families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bottomer surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Staffordshire leads with 21 Bottomers recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.76x.

County Total Index
Staffordshire 21 18.76x
Nottinghamshire 8 17.90x
Hampshire 5 7.36x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Beeston in Nottinghamshire leads with 8 Bottomers recorded in 1881 and an index of 1568.63x.

Place Total Index
Beeston 8 1568.63x
Caverswall 7 1206.90x
Walsall Foreign 6 103.81x
Boldre 4 1666.67x
Cheadle 4 740.74x
Checkley 4 1379.31x
Christchurch 1 68.03x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bottomer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Ann 2
Emma 2
Alice 1
Annie 1
Charlotte 1
Eliza 1
Frances 1
Hannah 1
Leah 1
Lucy 1
Mary 1
Sarah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bottomer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Edward 2
Thomas 2
William 2
Willm. 2
Enoch 1
Ephraim 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Herbert 1
James 1
Lewis 1
Saml. 1
Thos. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Bottomer households.

FAQ

Bottomer surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bottomer surname in 1881?

In 1881, 34 people were recorded with the Bottomer surname. That placed it at #28,837 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bottomer surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 90 in 2016. That gives Bottomer a modern rank of #32,202.

What does the Bottomer map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bottomer bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.