NameCensus.

UK surname

Brigs

In the 1881 census there were 78 people recorded with the Brigs surname, ranking it #22,500 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 10, ranked #37,599, down from #22,500 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Halifax and Totternhoe. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Brigs is 202 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 87.2%.

1881 census count

78

Ranked #22,500

Modern count

10

2016, ranked #37,599

Peak year

1851

202 bearers

Map years

2

1851 to 1861

Key insights

  • Brigs had 78 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #22,500 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 10 in 2016, ranked #37,599.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 202 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Brigs surname distribution map

The map shows where the Brigs surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Brigs surname density by area, 1861 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Brigs over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 202 #10,323
1861 historical 180 #13,057
1881 historical 78 #22,500
1891 historical 40 #31,174
1901 historical 11 #32,907
1911 historical 50 #27,806
1997 modern 11 #36,912
1998 modern 9 #37,189
1999 modern 8 #37,367
2000 modern 8 #37,264
2001 modern 7 #37,293
2002 modern 3 #38,152
2003 modern 4 #37,951
2004 modern 3 #38,241
2005 modern 3 #38,312
2006 modern 5 #37,956
2007 modern 5 #38,004
2008 modern 4 #38,216
2009 modern 3 #38,494
2010 modern 5 #38,186
2011 modern 8 #37,737
2012 modern 8 #37,740
2013 modern 6 #38,049
2014 modern 7 #37,929
2015 modern 7 #37,920
2016 modern 10 #37,599

Geography

Back to top

Where Brigs' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Halifax, Totternhoe, Bradford and St Mary Islington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Halifax Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Totternhoe Bedfordshire
4 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding
5 St Mary Islington London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Brigs

These lists show first names that appear often with the Brigs surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Brigs

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Brigs, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Brigs surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Brigs household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Brigs is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Brigs is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - Other

This describes the area pattern most associated with Brigs, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Brigs families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Brigs surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Durham leads with 10 Brigs' recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.54x.

County Total Index
Durham 10 4.54x
Monmouthshire 10 18.66x
Yorkshire 8 1.09x
Lancashire 6 0.68x
Middlesex 6 0.81x
Nottinghamshire 6 6.01x
Buckinghamshire 5 11.16x
Essex 4 2.73x
Norfolk 4 3.51x
Sussex 4 3.20x
Lincolnshire 3 2.53x
Cheshire 2 1.22x
Derbyshire 1 0.86x
Devon 1 0.65x
Kirkcudbrightshire 1 9.32x
Lanarkshire 1 0.42x
Northamptonshire 1 1.43x
Shropshire 1 1.56x
Surrey 1 0.28x
Warwickshire 1 0.54x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. St Woollos in Monmouthshire leads with 10 Brigs' recorded in 1881 and an index of 167.22x.

Place Total Index
St Woollos 10 167.22x
Whitworth 6 372.67x
Radford 5 98.43x
Stony Stratford West 5 1612.90x
Benfieldside 4 275.86x
Great Yeldham 4 2666.67x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 4 116.96x
Southwick 4 606.06x
Burton By Lincoln 3 4285.71x
North Bierley 3 75.57x
Batley 2 28.65x
Bethnal Green London 2 6.21x
Great Bolton 2 17.17x
Liverpool 2 3.74x
Mile End Old Town London 2 12.68x
Altrincham 1 34.97x
Birkenhead 1 7.67x
Birmingham 1 1.61x
Blackwell 1 175.44x
Bramley In Bramley 1 35.59x
Dalton In Thirsk 1 1666.67x
Dorking 1 41.32x
East Stonehouse 1 32.89x
Ellesmere 1 90.91x
Govan 1 1.69x
Islington London 1 1.39x
Lancaster 1 19.12x
Lochrutton 1 625.00x
Nottingham St Mary 1 3.87x
Salford 1 3.87x
St Martin In Fields 1 22.52x
Tichmarsh 1 434.78x
Treeton 1 588.24x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Brigs surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Eliza 4
Elizabeth 4
Mary 4
Emma 3
Harriet 3
Sarah 3
Annie 2
Catherine 2
Charlotte 2
Louisa 2
Rachel 2
Agnes 1
Beatrice 1
Betsy 1
Betty 1
Ellen 1
Fanny 1
Jenny 1
Laura 1
Mabel 1
Martha 1
May 1
Nora 1
Rebekah 1
Rose 1
Trabela 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Brigs surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Brigs surname: questions and answers

How common was the Brigs surname in 1881?

In 1881, 78 people were recorded with the Brigs surname. That placed it at #22,500 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Brigs surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 10 in 2016. That gives Brigs a modern rank of #37,599.

What does the Brigs map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Brigs bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.