NameCensus.

UK surname

Bruster

An English surname derived from an archaic word for a wood gatherer or forester.

In the 1881 census there were 73 people recorded with the Bruster surname, ranking it #23,220 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 6, ranked #38,110, down from #23,220 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Greenwich, Stockport and Walthamstow, Low Leyton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bruster is 160 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 91.8%.

1881 census count

73

Ranked #23,220

Modern count

6

2016, ranked #38,110

Peak year

1861

160 bearers

Map years

1

1861 to 1861

Key insights

  • Bruster had 73 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,220 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016, ranked #38,110.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 160 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Bruster surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bruster surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bruster surname density by area, 1861 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bruster over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 66 #21,617
1861 historical 160 #14,468
1881 historical 73 #23,220
1891 historical 70 #28,073
1901 historical 30 #30,724
1911 historical 26 #30,547
1997 modern 10 #37,060
1998 modern 9 #37,189
1999 modern 11 #36,917
2000 modern 8 #37,264
2001 modern 8 #37,124
2002 modern 9 #37,051
2003 modern 8 #37,248
2004 modern 7 #37,496
2005 modern 7 #37,581
2006 modern 7 #37,634
2007 modern 7 #37,687
2008 modern 7 #37,735
2009 modern 7 #37,816
2010 modern 7 #37,904
2011 modern 7 #37,865
2012 modern 8 #37,740
2013 modern 7 #37,909
2014 modern 8 #37,806
2015 modern 6 #38,076
2016 modern 6 #38,110

Geography

Back to top

Where Brusters are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Greenwich, Stockport, Walthamstow, Low Leyton, St Leonard Shoreditch and Uppingham, Beaumont Chase. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Greenwich London (South Districts)
2 Stockport Cheshire
3 Walthamstow, Low Leyton Essex
4 St Leonard Shoreditch London (East Districts)
5 Uppingham, Beaumont Chase Rutland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bruster

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bruster surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bruster

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bruster, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Bruster surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Bruster household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Bruster is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bruster is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Other Ethnic Group

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bruster, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Bruster

The surname BRUSTER originated in the German region of Bavaria in the early 12th century. It is derived from the Old High German words "brusten" meaning "to swell or bulge" and "hus" meaning "house". This suggests the name was likely given to someone who lived in a particularly large or bulging house.

One of the earliest recorded mentions of the name BRUSTER can be found in the Bavarian town records of Landshut from 1187, referencing a Wilhelm Bruster who was a local merchant. The name also appears in the records of the Cistercian abbey of Aldersbach from 1212, referring to a monk named Dietrich Bruster.

In 1329, a man named Hans Bruster was recorded as a master stonemason working on the construction of the Frauenkirche cathedral in Munich. This suggests the name had spread from its original rural roots to urban centers by the 14th century.

The earliest known spelling variation of the name was "Brusterius", found in a 1401 manuscript from the University of Heidelberg referring to a scholar named Johannes Brusterius.

One of the most notable early bearers of the BRUSTER name was Matthäus Bruster (1492-1567), a German Protestant reformer and theologian who was a close associate of Martin Luther. He is known for his translations of biblical texts into German.

Other historically significant individuals with the surname include Johann Bruster (1621-1677), a Baroque composer and organist from Nuremberg, and Sophia Bruster (1765-1833), a celebrated Bavarian folk artist known for her intricate woodcarvings.

In the 19th century, the name spread further with Theodor Bruster (1819-1891), a German-American pioneer and politician who served as the 12th Lieutenant Governor of Wisconsin.

A more recent bearer was Gerhard Bruster (1892-1969), an influential German architect in the Bauhaus and International Style movements who helped rebuild cities after World War II.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bruster families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bruster surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Northamptonshire leads with 10 Brusters recorded in 1881 and an index of 14.73x.

County Total Index
Northamptonshire 10 14.73x
Rutland 10 188.68x
Cumberland 9 14.49x
Nottinghamshire 8 8.23x
Surrey 6 1.71x
Yorkshire 6 0.84x
Essex 5 3.51x
Lincolnshire 5 4.33x
Glamorgan 3 2.39x
Herefordshire 3 10.14x
Lancashire 2 0.23x
Anglesey 1 7.82x
Angus 1 1.50x
Channel Islands 1 4.68x
Kent 1 0.41x
Middlesex 1 0.14x
Midlothian 1 1.03x
Staffordshire 1 0.41x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Peterborough in Northamptonshire leads with 10 Brusters recorded in 1881 and an index of 203.67x.

Place Total Index
Peterborough 10 203.67x
Uppingham 10 1587.30x
Shelford Saxondale 8 6153.85x
Lambeth 6 9.54x
Leyton 5 204.08x
Preston Quarter 5 287.36x
Great Grimsby 3 40.98x
Hereford St Peter 3 379.75x
Aysgarth 2 2222.22x
Crosscanonby 2 97.56x
Liverpool 2 3.85x
Swansea Town 2 19.42x
Workington 2 56.18x
Brampton Bierlow 1 108.70x
Bushbury 1 227.27x
Chatham 1 14.77x
Edinburgh St Stephens 1 52.63x
Fylingdales 1 277.78x
Hemsworth 1 243.90x
Holyhead 1 42.02x
Islington London 1 1.43x
Kirton 1 217.39x
Montrose 1 24.69x
Shipley 1 26.95x
St Anne 1 263.16x
Stamford St George 1 192.31x
Swansea Lower 1 156.25x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bruster surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 6
Sarah 4
Annie 2
Elizabeth 2
Emma 2
Margaret 2
Martha 2
Agnes 1
Alice 1
Ann 1
Beatrice 1
Betsy 1
Dorothy 1
Edith 1
Elvina 1
Emily 1
Faith 1
Florence 1
Frances 1
Gertrudy 1
Hannah 1
Jane 1
Janet 1
Jessie 1
Marianne 1
Miriam 1
Rosa 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bruster surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 5
William 4
Herbert 2
Moses 2
Samuel 2
Thomas 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Edward 1
George 1
Henery 1
Henry 1
James 1
Joseph 1
Mark 1
Matthew 1
Sidney 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Bruster surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bruster surname in 1881?

In 1881, 73 people were recorded with the Bruster surname. That placed it at #23,220 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bruster surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016. That gives Bruster a modern rank of #38,110.

What does the Bruster surname mean?

An English surname derived from an archaic word for a wood gatherer or forester.

What does the Bruster map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bruster bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.