NameCensus.

UK surname

Bucham

In the 1881 census there were 107 people recorded with the Bucham surname, ranking it #18,982 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 5, ranked #38,264, down from #18,982 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff and Hawick and Wilton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bucham is 241 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 95.3%.

1881 census count

107

Ranked #18,982

Modern count

5

2016, ranked #38,264

Peak year

1861

241 bearers

Map years

4

1861 to 1911

Key insights

  • Bucham had 107 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,982 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 5 in 2016, ranked #38,264.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 241 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Bucham surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bucham surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bucham surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bucham over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 67 #21,440
1861 historical 241 #10,192
1881 historical 107 #18,982
1891 historical 240 #13,123
1901 historical 85 #24,636
1911 historical 211 #14,467
1997 modern 8 #37,372
1998 modern 7 #37,533
1999 modern 4 #38,100
2000 modern 9 #37,119
2001 modern 5 #37,652
2002 modern 1 #38,709
2003 modern 1 #38,735
2004 modern 2 #38,464
2005 modern 3 #38,312
2006 modern 5 #37,956
2007 modern 5 #38,004
2008 modern 4 #38,216
2009 modern 6 #37,953
2010 modern 4 #38,371
2011 modern 4 #38,338
2012 modern 6 #38,008
2013 modern 6 #38,049
2014 modern 6 #38,077
2015 modern 6 #38,076
2016 modern 5 #38,264

Geography

Back to top

Where Buchams are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Hawick and Wilton, London parishes and Clee. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
3 Hawick and Wilton Roxburgh
4 London parishes London 3
5 Clee Lincolnshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bucham

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bucham surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bucham

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bucham, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Bucham surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Bucham household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Bucham is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bucham is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bucham, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bucham families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bucham surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 18 Buchams recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.77x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 18 1.77x
Durham 12 3.98x
Roxburghshire 11 59.88x
Selkirkshire 8 87.15x
Cumberland 6 6.87x
Lancashire 6 0.50x
Northumberland 6 3.98x
Sussex 6 3.51x
Kent 5 1.44x
Yorkshire 5 0.50x
Midlothian 4 2.94x
Surrey 4 0.81x
Devon 3 1.42x
Hampshire 2 0.96x
Lincolnshire 2 1.23x
Norfolk 2 1.28x
Warwickshire 2 0.78x
Cheshire 1 0.45x
Glamorgan 1 0.57x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Whitburn in Durham leads with 9 Buchams recorded in 1881 and an index of 1285.71x.

Place Total Index
Whitburn 9 1285.71x
Galashiels 8 235.99x
Bedlington 6 119.05x
Eastbourne 6 76.24x
Wilton 6 297.03x
Chelsea London 5 16.36x
Hawick 5 121.65x
Bromley London 4 17.92x
Ellenborough Ewanrigg 4 655.74x
Lambeth 4 4.52x
Plumstead 4 34.66x
South Leith 4 26.16x
West Derby 4 11.36x
Chester Le Street 3 129.31x
Leeds 3 5.29x
St George Hanover Square 3 16.79x
Stoke Damerel 3 20.30x
Birmingham 2 2.35x
Kensington London 2 3.55x
Portsea 2 4.91x
Preston Quarter 2 81.63x
Stratton Strawless 2 3333.33x
Toxteth Park 2 4.91x
Wilksby 2 20000.00x
Birkenhead 1 5.60x
Doncaster 1 13.62x
Hammersmith London 1 4.00x
Hampstead London 1 6.33x
Llanwonno 1 15.75x
Ramsgate 1 17.70x
Southcoates 1 17.92x
St George Martyr London 1 48.78x
St Luke London 1 6.15x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bucham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 4
Mary 4
Jane 3
Sarah 3
Ann 2
Caroline 2
Ellen 2
Isabella 2
Margaret 2
Anna 1
Annie 1
Beatrice 1
Betsy 1
Blanch 1
Cecilia 1
Clara 1
Eliza 1
Emma 1
Florence 1
Georgena 1
Gertrude 1
Lillian 1
Louisa 1
Lucy 1
Rebecca 1
Rosettia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bucham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Bucham surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bucham surname in 1881?

In 1881, 107 people were recorded with the Bucham surname. That placed it at #18,982 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bucham surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 5 in 2016. That gives Bucham a modern rank of #38,264.

What does the Bucham map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bucham bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.