NameCensus.

UK surname

Burgum

In the 1881 census there were 104 people recorded with the Burgum surname, ranking it #19,296 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 228, ranked #17,936, up from #19,296 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, East Dean, Little Dean, Flaxley, Abinghall, Weston-under-Penyard (Ross, Herefordshire), Lea (Ross, H and St Werburgh. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Stockton-on-Tees, Newport and Merthyr Tydfil.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Burgum is 287 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 119.2%.

1881 census count

104

Ranked #19,296

Modern count

228

2016, ranked #17,936

Peak year

2002

287 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Burgum had 104 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #19,296 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 228 in 2016, ranked #17,936.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 222 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Burgum surname distribution map

The map shows where the Burgum surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Burgum surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Burgum over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 70 #21,020
1861 historical 74 #24,370
1881 historical 104 #19,296
1891 historical 134 #19,777
1901 historical 173 #16,579
1911 historical 222 #13,992
1997 modern 263 #14,769
1998 modern 276 #14,679
1999 modern 284 #14,474
2000 modern 277 #14,688
2001 modern 276 #14,507
2002 modern 287 #14,402
2003 modern 256 #15,377
2004 modern 265 #15,110
2005 modern 265 #15,048
2006 modern 277 #14,667
2007 modern 282 #14,618
2008 modern 277 #14,940
2009 modern 274 #15,395
2010 modern 271 #15,856
2011 modern 268 #15,843
2012 modern 254 #16,328
2013 modern 244 #17,072
2014 modern 240 #17,387
2015 modern 237 #17,413
2016 modern 228 #17,936

Geography

Back to top

Where Burgums are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, East Dean, Little Dean, Flaxley, Abinghall, Weston-under-Penyard (Ross, Herefordshire), Lea (Ross, H, St Werburgh and Mottram-in-Longdendale. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Stockton-on-Tees, Newport and Merthyr Tydfil. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 3
2 East Dean, Little Dean, Flaxley, Abinghall, Weston-under-Penyard (Ross, Herefordshire), Lea (Ross, H Gloucestershire
3 St Werburgh Derbyshire
4 Mottram-in-Longdendale Lancashire
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Stockton-on-Tees 004 Stockton-on-Tees
2 Stockton-on-Tees 003 Stockton-on-Tees
3 Newport 001 Newport
4 Stockton-on-Tees 002 Stockton-on-Tees
5 Merthyr Tydfil 002 Merthyr Tydfil

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Burgum

These lists show first names that appear often with the Burgum surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Burgum

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Burgum, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Burgum surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Burgum household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Burgum is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Burgum is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Burgum falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Burgum is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Burgum, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Burgum families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Burgum surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Gloucestershire leads with 22 Burgums recorded in 1881 and an index of 11.06x.

County Total Index
Gloucestershire 22 11.06x
Middlesex 22 2.17x
Lancashire 21 1.74x
Herefordshire 12 28.85x
Warwickshire 8 3.13x
Worcestershire 7 5.28x
Yorkshire 5 0.50x
Cheshire 4 1.79x
Brecknockshire 1 4.93x
Leicestershire 1 0.89x
Sussex 1 0.58x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. St Luke London in Middlesex leads with 10 Burgums recorded in 1881 and an index of 61.46x.

Place Total Index
St Luke London 10 61.46x
English Bicknor 9 4090.91x
Great Bolton 9 56.46x
Aston 8 11.36x
Hackney London 7 12.31x
Ruardean 7 1555.56x
Weston Under Penyard 7 2413.79x
Tonge With Haulgh 6 256.41x
Nether Hallam 5 36.76x
Aston Ingham 4 2857.14x
Claines 4 109.89x
Monks Coppenhall 4 47.34x
Bury 3 21.82x
Newland 3 179.64x
Shoreditch London 3 6.82x
Great Crosby 2 60.98x
St Pancras London 2 2.45x
Abberley 1 476.19x
Belgrave 1 39.37x
Bitton 1 57.80x
Brecknock St John 1 58.48x
Clifton 1 9.94x
Great Malvern 1 36.23x
Hove 1 13.33x
Kidderminster Borough 1 12.90x
Leyland 1 47.85x
Linton In Newent 1 312.50x
South Hamlet 1 81.30x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Burgum surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 7
Sarah 6
Charlotte 3
Edith 3
Elizabeth 3
Emma 3
Jane 3
Ada 2
Florence 2
Hannah 2
Laura 2
(John) 1
Alice 1
Alwin 1
Amelia 1
Ann 1
Anna 1
Annie 1
Bertha 1
Caroline 1
Eliza 1
Emily 1
Felicia 1
Florance 1
Gertrude 1
Hanh. 1
Harriet 1
Kate 1
Lilian 1
Louise 1
Nellie 1
Rholinda 1
Rosa 1
Sophia 1
Unm 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Burgum surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 8
John 6
George 4
Henry 4
Edwd. 2
Harry 2
Thomas 2
Tom 2
Wm. 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Daniel 1
Edwin 1
Harold 1
Jas. 1
Joseph 1
Oliver 1
Roland 1
Saml. 1

FAQ

Burgum surname: questions and answers

How common was the Burgum surname in 1881?

In 1881, 104 people were recorded with the Burgum surname. That placed it at #19,296 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Burgum surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 228 in 2016. That gives Burgum a modern rank of #17,936.

What does the Burgum map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Burgum bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.