NameCensus.

UK surname

Bust

In the 1881 census there were 145 people recorded with the Bust surname, ranking it #15,838 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 95, ranked #31,782, down from #15,838 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Shirland, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard and St James Clerkenwell. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Newark and Sherwood, South Kesteven and Bolsover.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bust is 267 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 34.5%.

1881 census count

145

Ranked #15,838

Modern count

95

2016, ranked #31,782

Peak year

1911

267 bearers

Map years

7

1851 to 1998

Key insights

  • Bust had 145 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,838 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 95 in 2016, ranked #31,782.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 267 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Bust surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bust surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bust surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bust over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 165 #12,053
1861 historical 255 #9,699
1881 historical 145 #15,838
1891 historical 250 #12,762
1901 historical 176 #16,401
1911 historical 267 #12,360
1997 modern 113 #25,106
1998 modern 115 #25,466
1999 modern 124 #24,508
2000 modern 122 #24,698
2001 modern 116 #25,089
2002 modern 116 #25,632
2003 modern 106 #26,775
2004 modern 108 #26,741
2005 modern 106 #27,044
2006 modern 98 #28,621
2007 modern 97 #29,156
2008 modern 92 #30,286
2009 modern 97 #30,076
2010 modern 102 #29,930
2011 modern 99 #30,218
2012 modern 101 #30,078
2013 modern 97 #31,239
2014 modern 96 #31,667
2015 modern 93 #31,972
2016 modern 95 #31,782

Geography

Back to top

Where Busts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Shirland, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, St James Clerkenwell, Bottesford with Normanton and Eastthorp and Walsall. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Newark and Sherwood, South Kesteven, Bolsover and Ashfield. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Shirland Derbyshire
2 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
3 St James Clerkenwell London (Central Districts)
4 Bottesford with Normanton and Eastthorp Lincolnshire
5 Walsall Staffordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Newark and Sherwood 005 Newark and Sherwood
2 South Kesteven 016 South Kesteven
3 Bolsover 005 Bolsover
4 Ashfield 007 Ashfield
5 Ashfield 009 Ashfield

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bust

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bust surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bust

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bust, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Bust surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Bust household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Bust is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Bust is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Bust falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bust is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bust, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bust families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bust surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 31 Busts recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.24x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 31 2.24x
Nottinghamshire 28 15.00x
Leicestershire 27 17.58x
Lincolnshire 17 7.68x
East Lothian 6 32.70x
Surrey 6 0.89x
Warwickshire 6 1.72x
Lancashire 5 0.30x
Essex 4 1.46x
Lanarkshire 3 0.67x
Gloucestershire 2 0.74x
Yorkshire 2 0.15x
Fife 1 1.22x
Kent 1 0.21x
Midlothian 1 0.54x
Somerset 1 0.45x
Staffordshire 1 0.21x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Basford in Nottinghamshire leads with 12 Busts recorded in 1881 and an index of 139.53x.

Place Total Index
Basford 12 139.53x
Ab Kettleby 11 10000.00x
St Giles Cripplegate 11 597.83x
Bottesford 9 1428.57x
Edingley 7 5000.00x
Nuthall 7 1000.00x
Whitekirk Tynninghame 6 1200.00x
Holwell 5 3846.15x
North Owersby 5 3125.00x
Barking 4 50.00x
Clerkenwell London 4 12.24x
Goxhill 4 727.27x
St George Bloomsbury 4 50.31x
St Luke London 4 18.00x
Winterton 4 526.32x
Aston 3 3.12x
Cambuslang 3 66.37x
Ealing 3 24.23x
Broughton In Salford 2 13.31x
Clapham 2 11.55x
Fishwick 2 196.08x
Spitalfields London 2 19.19x
Tottenham 2 9.07x
Bermondsey 1 2.43x
Bristol St George 1 7.96x
Bristol St James St Paul 1 11.04x
Caistor 1 113.64x
Clevedon 1 43.10x
Edgbaston 1 9.23x
Hallam 1 714.29x
Holy Trinity 1 3.03x
Kinghorn 1 57.47x
Kirkby Cum Osgodby 1 555.56x
Lasswade 1 23.58x
Leamington Priors 1 11.64x
Leeds 1 1.29x
Livesey 1 34.72x
Loughborough 1 14.35x
Nettleham 1 222.22x
Newington 1 1.95x
Nuneaton 1 24.69x
Selston 1 47.85x
Southwark St George Martyr 1 3.59x
St Margaret Lincoln 1 500.00x
Tonbridge 1 5.87x
Twickenham 1 16.84x
Walsall Foreign 1 4.14x
Wandsworth 1 7.50x
Wartnaby 1 1250.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bust surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bust surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 9
John 7
Robert 7
Charles 3
Frederick 3
Henry 3
Joseph 3
Thomas 3
Arthur 2
Frederic 2
James 2
Samuel 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Auther 1
Ebenezer 1
Edward 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
George 1
Gregory 1
Herbert 1
Jno. 1
Silvester 1
Stephen 1
Thos. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Bust surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bust surname in 1881?

In 1881, 145 people were recorded with the Bust surname. That placed it at #15,838 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bust surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 95 in 2016. That gives Bust a modern rank of #31,782.

What does the Bust map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bust bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.