NameCensus.

UK surname

Cavannah

In the 1881 census there were 111 people recorded with the Cavannah surname, ranking it #18,597 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 1, ranked #39,061, down from #18,597 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Rochdale, Manchester and Liverpool. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Cavannah is 166 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 99.1%.

1881 census count

111

Ranked #18,597

Modern count

1

2016, ranked #39,061

Peak year

1861

166 bearers

Map years

4

1851 to 1891

Key insights

  • Cavannah had 111 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,597 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 1 in 2016, ranked #39,061.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 166 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Cavannah surname distribution map

The map shows where the Cavannah surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Cavannah surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Cavannah over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 150 #12,905
1861 historical 166 #14,039
1881 historical 111 #18,597
1891 historical 117 #21,658
1901 historical 80 #25,251
1911 historical 43 #28,581
1997 modern 6 #37,704
1998 modern 6 #37,703
1999 modern 7 #37,513
2000 modern 7 #37,430
2001 modern 5 #37,652
2002 modern 2 #38,400
2003 modern 2 #38,424
2004 modern 1 #38,771
2012 modern 1 #38,986
2013 modern 2 #38,761
2014 modern 1 #39,020
2015 modern 1 #39,021
2016 modern 1 #39,061

Geography

Back to top

Where Cavannahs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Rochdale, Manchester, Liverpool, Easington and Chester St John the Baptist, St Mary-on-the-Hill, St Olave, St Michael, Spittle Boughton, Chester Ca. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Rochdale Lancashire
2 Manchester Lancashire
3 Liverpool Lancashire
4 Easington Durham
5 Chester St John the Baptist, St Mary-on-the-Hill, St Olave, St Michael, Spittle Boughton, Chester Ca Cheshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Cavannah

These lists show first names that appear often with the Cavannah surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Cavannah

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Cavannah, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Cavannah surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Cavannah household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Cavannah is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Cavannah is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Unknown

This describes the area pattern most associated with Cavannah, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Cavannah families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Cavannah surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 72 Cavannahs recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.60x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 72 5.60x
Yorkshire 10 0.93x
Middlesex 7 0.65x
Surrey 7 1.33x
Cheshire 4 1.67x
Leicestershire 3 2.50x
East Lothian 2 13.95x
Cumberland 1 1.07x
Durham 1 0.31x
Glamorgan 1 0.53x
Lincolnshire 1 0.58x
Northumberland 1 0.62x
Warwickshire 1 0.37x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Oldham in Lancashire leads with 10 Cavannahs recorded in 1881 and an index of 24.11x.

Place Total Index
Oldham 10 24.11x
Ardwick 8 69.03x
Manchester 8 13.85x
Castleton 7 54.56x
Salford 7 18.53x
Spotland 7 49.02x
Liverpool 6 7.69x
Saddleworth 6 72.46x
Lambeth 5 5.30x
Warrington 5 32.83x
Hulme 3 11.19x
Leicester St Margaret 3 10.25x
Mile End Old Town London 3 13.02x
Chorlton On Medlock 2 9.80x
Halifax 2 12.70x
Islington London 2 1.91x
Linthorpe 2 31.25x
Livesey 2 88.89x
Stockport 2 16.26x
Toxteth Park 2 4.60x
Tranent 2 103.09x
Ashton Under Lyne 1 3.56x
Battersea 1 2.51x
Birkenhead 1 5.25x
Cardiff St Mary 1 9.63x
Coventry St Michael 1 11.40x
Cowpen 1 26.95x
Dukinfield 1 9.06x
Gateshead 1 4.15x
Hackney London 1 1.65x
Kirkby 1 192.31x
Newington 1 2.50x
Newton 1 10.10x
Poplar London 1 4.89x
Skelmersdale 1 46.73x
Southworth With Croft 1 263.16x
St Botolph Lincoln 1 80.65x
Workington 1 18.73x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Cavannah surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 10
Bridget 4
Sarah 4
Ann 3
Catherine 3
Annie 2
Ellen 2
Emma 2
Maria 2
Alice 1
Charlotte 1
E.M. 1
Edna 1
Elizabeth 1
Emily 1
Fanney 1
Florence 1
Francis 1
Janet 1
Kate 1
Lizze 1
M. 1
M.J. 1
Margaret 1
Matilda 1
Meddia 1
Roxan 1
Susan 1
Tamar 1
Winifrid 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Cavannah surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 11
James 8
Thomas 6
William 4
Peter 3
C. 2
Joseph 2
Patrick 2
Richard 2
Barnard 1
Dinnis 1
Edward 1
George 1
H. 1
Henry 1
Larance 1
Mich. 1
Michael 1
Michl. 1
Percy 1
Terrance 1
Thos. 1
Willm. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Cavannah surname: questions and answers

How common was the Cavannah surname in 1881?

In 1881, 111 people were recorded with the Cavannah surname. That placed it at #18,597 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Cavannah surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 1 in 2016. That gives Cavannah a modern rank of #39,061.

What does the Cavannah map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Cavannah bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.