NameCensus.

UK surname

Charlish

In the 1881 census there were 150 people recorded with the Charlish surname, ranking it #15,489 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 148, ranked #23,958, down from #15,489 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Beccles and Earsham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Bournemouth, Elmbridge and Northumberland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Charlish is 221 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 1.3%.

1881 census count

150

Ranked #15,489

Modern count

148

2016, ranked #23,958

Peak year

1911

221 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Charlish had 150 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,489 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 148 in 2016, ranked #23,958.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 221 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Charlish surname distribution map

The map shows where the Charlish surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Charlish surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Charlish over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 66 #21,617
1861 historical 63 #25,901
1881 historical 150 #15,489
1891 historical 181 #16,065
1901 historical 186 #15,839
1911 historical 221 #14,044
1997 modern 151 #21,034
1998 modern 159 #20,916
1999 modern 157 #21,201
2000 modern 150 #21,781
2001 modern 157 #20,884
2002 modern 166 #20,532
2003 modern 146 #22,069
2004 modern 142 #22,573
2005 modern 139 #22,887
2006 modern 142 #22,724
2007 modern 143 #22,924
2008 modern 145 #22,929
2009 modern 146 #23,352
2010 modern 154 #23,082
2011 modern 150 #23,309
2012 modern 140 #24,376
2013 modern 140 #24,779
2014 modern 141 #24,855
2015 modern 140 #24,836
2016 modern 148 #23,958

Geography

Back to top

Where Charlishs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Beccles, Earsham and Ilketshall St Lawrence, Bungay St Mary, Bungay Holy Trinity. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Bournemouth, Elmbridge, Northumberland, Rushcliffe and Clashindarroch. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 London parishes London 3
3 Beccles Suffolk
4 Earsham Norfolk
5 Ilketshall St Lawrence, Bungay St Mary, Bungay Holy Trinity Suffolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Bournemouth 024 Bournemouth
2 Elmbridge 016 Elmbridge
3 Northumberland 037 Northumberland
4 Rushcliffe 008 Rushcliffe
5 Clashindarroch Aberdeenshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Charlish

These lists show first names that appear often with the Charlish surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Charlish

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Charlish, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Charlish surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Charlish household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Charlish is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Charlish is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Charlish falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Charlish is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Charlish, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Charlish families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Charlish surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 49 Charlishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 21.78x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 49 21.78x
Suffolk 45 25.25x
Middlesex 21 1.44x
Sussex 12 4.86x
Surrey 9 1.26x
Durham 5 1.15x
Yorkshire 4 0.28x
Essex 2 0.69x
Gloucestershire 1 0.35x
Hertfordshire 1 0.99x
Kent 1 0.20x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Beccles in Suffolk leads with 21 Charlishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 731.71x.

Place Total Index
Beccles 21 731.71x
Brighton 12 24.12x
Redenhall 10 1149.43x
Bungay St Mary 8 909.09x
Kensington London 8 9.84x
Lowestoft 8 95.01x
Mundham 8 5333.33x
Bungay Holy Trinity 7 769.23x
St Anne Soho London 7 83.83x
Diss 5 259.07x
Newington 5 9.25x
Seething 5 2500.00x
Stockton On Tees 5 23.83x
Stratton St Mary 5 1612.90x
Bedale 4 754.72x
Earsham 4 1290.32x
Croydon 3 7.58x
Hackney London 3 3.66x
Brooke 2 571.43x
Hedenham 2 1428.57x
St Gilesin Fields London 2 161.29x
Stisted 2 540.54x
Tasburgh 2 909.09x
Thorpe Abbotts 2 1818.18x
Cheltenham 1 4.52x
Chipping Barnet 1 56.82x
Clapham 1 5.47x
Great Yarmouth 1 5.37x
Henham 1 1250.00x
Islington London 1 0.71x
Lewisham 1 3.76x
Necton 1 250.00x
Norwich St George Tombland 1 250.00x
Norwich St Paul 1 74.07x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Charlish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Alice 5
Elizabeth 5
Ellen 4
Emma 4
Emily 3
Florence 3
Harriet 3
Mary 3
Caroline 2
Edith 2
Hannah 2
Jane 2
Kate 2
Laura 2
Lydia 2
Maria 2
Rose 2
Sarah 2
Adela 1
Affiea 1
Agnes 1
Amelia 1
Ann 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Clara 1
Dora 1
Eliza 1
Ethel 1
Georgiana 1
Hetty 1
Isabella 1
Jemima 1
Katharine 1
Lorina 1
Louisa 1
Louise 1
Marion 1
Marrian 1
Maud 1
May 1
Minnie 1
Orford 1
Rebecca 1
Rosa 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Charlish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 9
Joseph 8
Robert 8
George 5
Harry 5
Frederick 4
John 4
Arthur 3
Charles 3
Edward 3
Henry 3
James 3
Alfred 2
Elisha 2
Thomas 2
David 1
Edgar 1
Edwd. 1
Fredk. 1
Fredrick 1
Gilbert 1
Walter 1
Walther 1

FAQ

Charlish surname: questions and answers

How common was the Charlish surname in 1881?

In 1881, 150 people were recorded with the Charlish surname. That placed it at #15,489 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Charlish surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 148 in 2016. That gives Charlish a modern rank of #23,958.

What does the Charlish map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Charlish bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.