NameCensus.

UK surname

Churm

In the 1881 census there were 261 people recorded with the Churm surname, ranking it #10,752 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 551, ranked #9,266, up from #10,752 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Wolverhampton, Dawley, Magna and Wellington, Wrockwardine, Eyton-on-the-Moors, Preston-on-the-Moors. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Rotherham, Telford and Wrekin and County Durham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Churm is 589 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 111.1%.

1881 census count

261

Ranked #10,752

Modern count

551

2016, ranked #9,266

Peak year

1999

589 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Churm had 261 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #10,752 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 551 in 2016, ranked #9,266.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 474 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Churm surname distribution map

The map shows where the Churm surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Churm surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Churm over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 172 #11,682
1861 historical 104 #20,477
1881 historical 261 #10,752
1891 historical 259 #12,399
1901 historical 428 #9,040
1911 historical 474 #8,162
1997 modern 548 #8,679
1998 modern 579 #8,581
1999 modern 589 #8,548
2000 modern 568 #8,717
2001 modern 563 #8,654
2002 modern 566 #8,788
2003 modern 565 #8,665
2004 modern 566 #8,685
2005 modern 550 #8,784
2006 modern 559 #8,714
2007 modern 565 #8,722
2008 modern 558 #8,864
2009 modern 567 #8,959
2010 modern 573 #9,073
2011 modern 554 #9,212
2012 modern 560 #9,050
2013 modern 561 #9,177
2014 modern 568 #9,147
2015 modern 560 #9,171
2016 modern 551 #9,266

Geography

Back to top

Where Churms are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wolverhampton, Dawley, Magna, Wellington, Wrockwardine, Eyton-on-the-Moors, Preston-on-the-Moors, Featherstone and North Wingfield (Woodthorpe, North Wingfield), Morton (Morton). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Rotherham, Telford and Wrekin, County Durham, Wakefield and North East Derbyshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wolverhampton Staffordshire
2 Dawley, Magna Shropshire
3 Wellington, Wrockwardine, Eyton-on-the-Moors, Preston-on-the-Moors Shropshire
4 Featherstone Yorkshire, West Riding
5 North Wingfield (Woodthorpe, North Wingfield), Morton (Morton) Derbyshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Rotherham 026 Rotherham
2 Telford and Wrekin 006 Telford and Wrekin
3 County Durham 059 County Durham
4 Wakefield 003 Wakefield
5 North East Derbyshire 011 North East Derbyshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Churm

These lists show first names that appear often with the Churm surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Churm

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Churm, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Churm surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Churm household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Churm is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Churm is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Churm falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Churm is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Churm, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Churm families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Churm surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Shropshire leads with 111 Churms recorded in 1881 and an index of 51.25x.

County Total Index
Shropshire 111 51.25x
Staffordshire 95 11.23x
Lancashire 36 1.21x
Yorkshire 11 0.44x
Channel Islands 1 1.35x
Hampshire 1 0.19x
Lanarkshire 1 0.12x
Oxfordshire 1 0.65x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Wellington in Shropshire leads with 75 Churms recorded in 1881 and an index of 616.27x.

Place Total Index
Wellington 75 616.27x
Wolverhampton 47 72.24x
Dawley 18 228.43x
Wombridge 16 599.25x
Bilston 13 79.27x
Willenhall 12 75.71x
Pendleton In Salford 9 25.40x
Chorlton On Medlock 8 16.93x
Stoke Upon Trent 8 8.92x
Tyldesley Cum Shakerley 8 93.46x
Whitwood 8 226.63x
Darlaston 5 42.77x
West Bromwich 5 10.32x
Ashton Under Lyne 3 4.61x
Harborne 3 11.06x
Chetwynd 2 285.71x
Barton Upon Irwell 1 4.47x
Brightside Bierlow 1 2.05x
Cannock 1 6.77x
Chorlton Cum Hardy 1 50.76x
Curbridge 1 192.31x
Glasgow 1 0.69x
Great Bolton 1 2.54x
Hulme 1 1.61x
Kimberworth 1 7.25x
Oldham 1 1.04x
Portsmouth 1 8.45x
Preston 1 1.26x
Rotherham 1 7.14x
Salford 1 1.14x
St Helier 1 4.14x
Stretford 1 6.11x
Walsall Foreign 1 2.29x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Churm surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Churm surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 16
Samuel 15
James 13
Joseph 11
Thomas 11
William 11
Henry 5
Enoch 4
George 4
Harry 4
Arthur 3
Edward 3
Richard 3
Robert 3
Albert 2
Alfred 2
Frederick 2
Luke 2
Mark 2
Wm. 2
Benjamin 1
Charles 1
Elias 1
Elijah 1
Emanuel 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Henery 1
Hezekiah 1
Jonah 1
Jos. 1
Philip 1
Walter 1
Willie 1
Willm. 1

FAQ

Churm surname: questions and answers

How common was the Churm surname in 1881?

In 1881, 261 people were recorded with the Churm surname. That placed it at #10,752 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Churm surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 551 in 2016. That gives Churm a modern rank of #9,266.

What does the Churm map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Churm bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.