NameCensus.

UK surname

Cosnett

In the 1881 census there were 129 people recorded with the Cosnett surname, ranking it #17,013 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 189, ranked #20,334, down from #17,013 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Pershore Holy Cross, Pershore St Andrew, Swindon and Severn Stoke. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Wychavon, Wolverhampton and Birmingham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Cosnett is 225 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 46.5%.

1881 census count

129

Ranked #17,013

Modern count

189

2016, ranked #20,334

Peak year

1999

225 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Cosnett had 129 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,013 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 189 in 2016, ranked #20,334.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 179 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established Multi-Ethnic Communities.

Cosnett surname distribution map

The map shows where the Cosnett surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Cosnett surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Cosnett over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 60 #22,584
1861 historical 65 #25,618
1881 historical 129 #17,013
1891 historical 126 #20,604
1901 historical 131 #19,552
1911 historical 179 #16,023
1997 modern 213 #16,948
1998 modern 221 #17,021
1999 modern 225 #16,931
2000 modern 223 #16,978
2001 modern 221 #16,848
2002 modern 215 #17,487
2003 modern 211 #17,513
2004 modern 224 #16,918
2005 modern 219 #17,126
2006 modern 217 #17,349
2007 modern 218 #17,477
2008 modern 218 #17,638
2009 modern 219 #17,960
2010 modern 217 #18,443
2011 modern 207 #18,841
2012 modern 212 #18,481
2013 modern 207 #19,093
2014 modern 205 #19,375
2015 modern 205 #19,269
2016 modern 189 #20,334

Geography

Back to top

Where Cosnetts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Pershore Holy Cross, Pershore St Andrew, Swindon, Severn Stoke, Halesowen (all except Hunnington, Romsley; partly in Halesowen, Worcestershire) and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Wychavon, Wolverhampton, Birmingham, Wyre Forest and Dudley. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Pershore Holy Cross, Pershore St Andrew Worcestershire
2 Swindon Gloucestershire
3 Severn Stoke Worcestershire
4 Halesowen (all except Hunnington, Romsley; partly in Halesowen, Worcestershire) Staffordshire
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Wychavon 012 Wychavon
2 Wolverhampton 031 Wolverhampton
3 Birmingham 062 Birmingham
4 Wyre Forest 010 Wyre Forest
5 Dudley 034 Dudley

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Cosnett

These lists show first names that appear often with the Cosnett surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Cosnett

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Cosnett, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Low-Skilled Migrant and Student Communities

Group

Established Multi-Ethnic Communities

Nationally, the Cosnett surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established Multi-Ethnic Communities, within Low-Skilled Migrant and Student Communities. This does not mean every Cosnett household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Parents and young children in this Group are drawn from diverse ethnic backgrounds in broadly similar proportions. Employment is typically in elementary occupations, though workers in professional, intermediate or skilled trades occupations are also present. The residential landscape is dominated by terraced housing, although semi-detached houses and flats are also present. This Group is found in London and in many provincial towns and cities throughout the U.K.

Wider pattern

Young adults, many of whom are students, predominate in these high-density and overcrowded neighbourhoods of rented terrace houses or flats. Most ethnic minorities are present in these communities, as are people born in European countries that are not part of the EU. Students aside, low skilled occupations predominate, and unemployment rates are above average. Overall, the mix of students and more sedentary households means that neighbourhood average numbers of children are not very high. The Mixed or Multiple ethnic group composition of neighbourhoods is often associated with low rates of affiliation to Christian religions. This Supergroup predominates in non-central urban locations the UK, particularly within England in the Midlands and the outskirts of west, south and north-east London.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Cosnett is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Cosnett is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Cosnett falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Cosnett is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Cosnett, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Cosnett families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Cosnett surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Worcestershire leads with 80 Cosnetts recorded in 1881 and an index of 50.65x.

County Total Index
Worcestershire 80 50.65x
Warwickshire 22 7.21x
Surrey 13 2.21x
Gloucestershire 5 2.11x
Kent 1 0.24x
Leicestershire 1 0.75x
Staffordshire 1 0.24x
Yorkshire 1 0.08x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Pershore Holy Cross in Worcestershire leads with 58 Cosnetts recorded in 1881 and an index of 5742.57x.

Place Total Index
Pershore Holy Cross 58 5742.57x
Birmingham 22 21.64x
Newington 9 20.14x
Kings Norton 5 35.31x
Cheltenham 4 21.86x
Croydon 4 12.23x
Oldbury 4 51.48x
Pershore St Andrew 4 459.77x
Ripple 3 1000.00x
Worcester St Nicholas 2 266.67x
Bishampton 1 555.56x
Cossington 1 588.24x
Gravesend 1 28.65x
Leigh 1 52.08x
Stoke Upon Trent 1 2.31x
Tickhill 1 131.58x
Upton On Severn 1 97.09x
Weston Subedge 1 714.29x
Wyre Piddle 1 909.09x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Cosnett surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 9
Mary 7
Elizabeth 6
Emily 4
Annie 3
Alice 2
Ann 2
Caroline 2
Eliza 2
Louisa 2
Lydia 2
Maria 2
Agnes 1
Amelia 1
Clara 1
Elizbth. 1
Ellen 1
Emma 1
Fanny 1
Flora 1
Florence 1
Gertrude 1
Hannah 1
Infant 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Jessie 1
Lizze 1
Margaret 1
Marth 1
Martha 1
Rose 1
Selina 1
Selley 1
Sophia 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Cosnett surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 8
James 7
George 4
John 4
Richard 4
Charles 3
Frederick 3
Samuel 3
Thomas 3
Henry 2
Herbert 2
Timothy 2
Walter 2
Alfred 1
Edwin 1
Frank 1
Fred. 1
Hubert 1
Jms. 1
Joseph 1
Richd. 1
Robert 1

FAQ

Cosnett surname: questions and answers

How common was the Cosnett surname in 1881?

In 1881, 129 people were recorded with the Cosnett surname. That placed it at #17,013 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Cosnett surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 189 in 2016. That gives Cosnett a modern rank of #20,334.

What does the Cosnett map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Cosnett bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.