NameCensus.

UK surname

Craston

In the 1881 census there were 97 people recorded with the Craston surname, ranking it #20,127 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 52, ranked #34,780, down from #20,127 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Shrewsbury St Alkmond, St Julian, St Mary (pt), Meole Brace, Toxteth Park and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Craston is 124 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 46.4%.

1881 census count

97

Ranked #20,127

Modern count

52

2016, ranked #34,780

Peak year

1861

124 bearers

Map years

2

1861 to 1911

Key insights

  • Craston had 97 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,127 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 52 in 2016, ranked #34,780.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 124 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Craston surname distribution map

The map shows where the Craston surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Craston surname density by area, 1911 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Craston over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 70 #21,020
1861 historical 124 #17,797
1881 historical 97 #20,127
1891 historical 72 #27,804
1901 historical 95 #23,462
1911 historical 103 #22,328
1997 modern 35 #34,174
1998 modern 40 #33,856
1999 modern 40 #33,967
2000 modern 43 #33,709
2001 modern 40 #33,842
2002 modern 41 #34,032
2003 modern 34 #34,681
2004 modern 35 #34,783
2005 modern 38 #34,741
2006 modern 41 #34,788
2007 modern 39 #35,097
2008 modern 42 #34,994
2009 modern 47 #34,856
2010 modern 47 #35,009
2011 modern 44 #35,161
2012 modern 47 #34,992
2013 modern 47 #35,071
2014 modern 50 #34,927
2015 modern 53 #34,726
2016 modern 52 #34,780

Geography

Back to top

Where Crastons are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Shrewsbury St Alkmond, St Julian, St Mary (pt), Meole Brace, Toxteth Park, Manchester, Lytham and Preston. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Shrewsbury St Alkmond, St Julian, St Mary (pt), Meole Brace Shropshire
2 Toxteth Park Lancashire
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 Lytham Lancashire
5 Preston Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Craston

These lists show first names that appear often with the Craston surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Craston

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Craston, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Craston surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Craston household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Craston is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Craston is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Craston, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Craston families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Craston surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 62 Crastons recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.64x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 62 5.64x
Cheshire 7 3.42x
Shropshire 7 8.74x
Kent 4 1.27x
Middlesex 4 0.43x
Westmorland 4 19.64x
Brecknockshire 2 10.79x
Surrey 2 0.44x
Gloucestershire 1 0.55x
Midlothian 1 0.81x
Yorkshire 1 0.11x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Chorlton On Medlock in Lancashire leads with 10 Crastons recorded in 1881 and an index of 57.24x.

Place Total Index
Chorlton On Medlock 10 57.24x
Preston 8 27.19x
Standish With Langtree 7 518.52x
West Derby 7 21.76x
Ashton Under Lyne 5 20.81x
Manchester 5 10.11x
Salford 5 15.46x
Toxteth Park 5 13.43x
Maidstone 4 42.46x
Aughton 3 275.23x
Bramhall 3 352.94x
Hindley 3 63.97x
Islington London 3 3.34x
Little Neston 3 909.09x
Oswestry Town 3 117.19x
Shrewsbury St Mary 3 94.94x
Stretford 3 49.59x
Brecknock St David 2 400.00x
Kirkby Lonsdale 2 363.64x
Lambeth 2 2.48x
Undermilbeck 2 298.51x
Bishops Castle In 1 212.77x
Bristol St Michael 1 64.10x
Edinburgh St Cuthberts 1 2.00x
Holy Trinity 1 4.53x
Nantwich 1 42.02x
Oldham 1 2.82x
St George Bloomsbury 1 18.80x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Craston surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 6
Sarah 5
Elizabeth 3
Ellen 3
Emma 3
Agnes 2
Alice 2
Hannah 2
Ada 1
Ann 1
Annie 1
Bertha 1
Carlotte 1
Edith 1
Eliza 1
Emily 1
Esther 1
Flora 1
Florence 1
Ida 1
Jane 1
Kate 1
Laura 1
Lily 1
Lizzie 1
Louisa 1
Margaret 1
Marie 1
Martha 1
Minnie 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Craston surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Edward 8
John 4
William 4
Charles 3
Frank 3
Henry 2
James 2
Joseph 2
Miles 2
Thomas 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Anthony 1
Arthur 1
George 1
Harry 1
Percy 1
Richard 1
Robert 1
Robt. 1
Robt.Dean 1
Will 1
Wm.M. 1

FAQ

Craston surname: questions and answers

How common was the Craston surname in 1881?

In 1881, 97 people were recorded with the Craston surname. That placed it at #20,127 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Craston surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 52 in 2016. That gives Craston a modern rank of #34,780.

What does the Craston map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Craston bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.