NameCensus.

UK surname

Crickett

In the 1881 census there were 70 people recorded with the Crickett surname, ranking it #23,670 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 163, ranked #22,407, up from #23,670 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Workington (Workington), Clossocks and Margate. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Suffolk Coastal, Copeland and Ipswich.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Crickett is 177 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 132.9%.

1881 census count

70

Ranked #23,670

Modern count

163

2016, ranked #22,407

Peak year

2010

177 bearers

Map years

6

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Crickett had 70 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,670 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 163 in 2016, ranked #22,407.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 143 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Crickett surname distribution map

The map shows where the Crickett surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Crickett surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Crickett over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 71 #20,875
1861 historical 97 #21,503
1881 historical 70 #23,670
1891 historical 140 #19,193
1901 historical 139 #18,876
1911 historical 143 #18,401
1997 modern 166 #19,797
1998 modern 174 #19,729
1999 modern 166 #20,458
2000 modern 166 #20,426
2001 modern 162 #20,460
2002 modern 166 #20,532
2003 modern 176 #19,623
2004 modern 161 #20,840
2005 modern 161 #20,799
2006 modern 162 #20,886
2007 modern 168 #20,634
2008 modern 171 #20,595
2009 modern 174 #20,782
2010 modern 177 #21,034
2011 modern 168 #21,563
2012 modern 169 #21,437
2013 modern 170 #21,726
2014 modern 167 #22,180
2015 modern 164 #22,325
2016 modern 163 #22,407

Geography

Back to top

Where Cricketts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Workington (Workington), Clossocks, Margate, Beckenham and Glasgow. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Suffolk Coastal, Copeland, Ipswich and Carlisle. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 3
2 Workington (Workington), Clossocks Cumberland
3 Margate Kent
4 Beckenham Kent
5 Glasgow Lanark

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Suffolk Coastal 014 Suffolk Coastal
2 Copeland 004 Copeland
3 Copeland 006 Copeland
4 Ipswich 010 Ipswich
5 Carlisle 010 Carlisle

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Crickett

These lists show first names that appear often with the Crickett surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Crickett

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Crickett, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Crickett surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Crickett household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Crickett is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Crickett is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Crickett falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Crickett is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Crickett, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Crickett families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Crickett surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 31 Cricketts recorded in 1881 and an index of 13.12x.

County Total Index
Kent 31 13.12x
Middlesex 7 1.01x
Lancashire 6 0.73x
Northamptonshire 5 7.68x
Cheshire 4 2.62x
Cumberland 4 6.71x
Gloucestershire 3 2.21x
Surrey 2 0.59x
Sussex 2 1.71x
Wiltshire 2 3.27x
Yorkshire 2 0.29x
Devon 1 0.69x
Lanarkshire 1 0.45x
Royal Navy 1 12.12x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Ramsgate in Kent leads with 16 Cricketts recorded in 1881 and an index of 414.51x.

Place Total Index
Ramsgate 16 414.51x
Margate St John Baptist 8 184.76x
Hackney London 5 12.88x
Northampton Priory St 5 127.88x
Oldham 5 18.85x
Ashton On Mersey 2 253.16x
Bexley 2 95.69x
Clifton 2 29.15x
Deal 2 99.50x
Hyde 2 44.35x
Lambeth 2 3.31x
Preston Quarter 2 119.76x
Salisbury St Edmund 2 204.08x
Brighton 1 4.25x
Bristol St James In 1 50.00x
Canterbury St Mildred 1 178.57x
Glasgow 1 2.52x
Harrington 1 138.89x
Havercroft Cum Cold 1 833.33x
Hove 1 19.53x
Kirkleatham 1 107.53x
Little Bolton 1 9.47x
Minster In Thanet 1 204.08x
River 1 666.67x
Royal Navy 1 14.18x
St Martin In Fields 1 24.10x
Stoke Damerel 1 9.91x
Whitechapel London 1 14.66x
Whitehaven 1 31.45x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Crickett surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 5
Ann 4
Elizabeth 3
Annie 2
Jane 2
Sarah 2
Amelia 1
Anne 1
Charlotte 1
Ellen 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Esther 1
Eva 1
Fanny 1
Hannah 1
Katie 1
Marian 1
Marie 1
Ruby 1
S.D. 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Crickett surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 5
William 5
Edward 4
Foster 3
Frederick 2
Richard 2
Alfred 1
Annie 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Forster 1
Fredk.Geo. 1
George 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
James 1
Jhon 1
Jonas 1
Norman 1
Robert 1
Sidney 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Crickett surname: questions and answers

How common was the Crickett surname in 1881?

In 1881, 70 people were recorded with the Crickett surname. That placed it at #23,670 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Crickett surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 163 in 2016. That gives Crickett a modern rank of #22,407.

What does the Crickett map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Crickett bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.