NameCensus.

UK surname

Crosher

In the 1881 census there were 97 people recorded with the Crosher surname, ranking it #20,127 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 99, ranked #31,358, down from #20,127 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Govan Combination, Loughborough and Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Bradford, East Riding of Yorkshire and Kingston upon Hull.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Crosher is 126 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 2.1%.

1881 census count

97

Ranked #20,127

Modern count

99

2016, ranked #31,358

Peak year

1998

126 bearers

Map years

5

1891 to 2006

Key insights

  • Crosher had 97 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,127 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 99 in 2016, ranked #31,358.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 113 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Crosher surname distribution map

The map shows where the Crosher surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Crosher surname density by area, 2006 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Crosher over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 66 #21,617
1861 historical 88 #22,554
1881 historical 97 #20,127
1891 historical 107 #22,967
1901 historical 113 #21,296
1911 historical 110 #21,519
1997 modern 124 #23,669
1998 modern 126 #24,094
1999 modern 119 #25,095
2000 modern 116 #25,452
2001 modern 118 #24,832
2002 modern 118 #25,358
2003 modern 111 #26,091
2004 modern 111 #26,293
2005 modern 103 #27,531
2006 modern 108 #27,015
2007 modern 105 #27,868
2008 modern 102 #28,664
2009 modern 106 #28,666
2010 modern 106 #29,305
2011 modern 102 #29,759
2012 modern 100 #30,258
2013 modern 98 #31,078
2014 modern 99 #31,186
2015 modern 102 #30,624
2016 modern 99 #31,358

Geography

Back to top

Where Croshers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Govan Combination, Loughborough, Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars, St Mary Islington and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Bradford, East Riding of Yorkshire, Kingston upon Hull, Dacorum and Wyre Forest. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Govan Combination Lanark
2 Loughborough Leicestershire
3 Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars Leicestershire
4 St Mary Islington London (North Districts)
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Bradford 012 Bradford
2 East Riding of Yorkshire 043 East Riding of Yorkshire
3 Kingston upon Hull 009 Kingston upon Hull, City of
4 Dacorum 009 Dacorum
5 Wyre Forest 007 Wyre Forest

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Crosher

These lists show first names that appear often with the Crosher surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Crosher

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Crosher, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Crosher surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Crosher household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Challenged Inner London Communities

Within London, Crosher is most associated with areas classed as Challenged Inner London Communities, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Resident in some of Inner London’s most over-crowded communities, many families have children and marriage/civil partnership rates are above the Supergroup average. Other adults such as students live in communal establishments. Few residents have Level 4 educational qualifications, levels of unemployment are above the Supergroup average, and employment is concentrated in service occupations such as distribution, hotels and restaurants. Relative to the Supergroup average, fewer residents identify as being of mixed/multiple ethnicities, Black or Other Asian.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Crosher is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Crosher falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Crosher is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Crosher, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Crosher families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Crosher surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 26 Croshers recorded in 1881 and an index of 10.90x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 26 10.90x
Leicestershire 19 18.12x
Lanarkshire 16 5.23x
Yorkshire 16 1.71x
Lancashire 7 0.62x
Berkshire 6 8.45x
Middlesex 2 0.21x
Surrey 2 0.43x
Cambridgeshire 1 1.67x
Cheshire 1 0.48x
Northamptonshire 1 1.12x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Aston in Warwickshire leads with 17 Croshers recorded in 1881 and an index of 25.88x.

Place Total Index
Aston 17 25.88x
Govan 12 15.86x
Leicester St Margaret 9 35.18x
Birmingham 8 10.06x
Filey 7 921.05x
Southcoates 7 134.62x
Winkfield 6 508.47x
Ardwick 5 49.41x
Barony 4 5.17x
Belgrave 3 126.58x
Loughborough 3 63.03x
Aylestone 2 240.96x
Ecclesall Bierlow 2 10.49x
Leicester St Mary 2 23.61x
Salford 2 6.06x
St Martin In Fields 2 35.34x
Camberwell 1 1.66x
Edgbaston 1 13.51x
Ely Holy Trinity St Mary 1 38.31x
Northampton St Sepulchre 1 22.08x
Sale 1 39.06x
Sutton 1 30.03x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Crosher surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 7
Sarah 4
Elizabeth 3
Alice 2
Ann 2
Beatrice 2
Hannah 2
Harriet 2
Jane 2
Ada 1
Annie 1
Bessy 1
Elizth.G. 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Emmeline 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Georgina 1
Lilla 1
Lily 1
Louisa 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Norah 1
Pricilla 1
Priscilla 1
Thomasine 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Crosher surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Henry 5
John 5
William 5
Edward 2
George 2
Richard 2
Thomas 2
Benjm. 1
Frederic 1
Geo. 1
Horatio 1
Joseph 1
Laurence 1
Mathew 1
Matthew 1
Richd. 1
Rupert 1
Warcup 1

FAQ

Crosher surname: questions and answers

How common was the Crosher surname in 1881?

In 1881, 97 people were recorded with the Crosher surname. That placed it at #20,127 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Crosher surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 99 in 2016. That gives Crosher a modern rank of #31,358.

What does the Crosher map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Crosher bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.