NameCensus.

UK surname

Cullam

In the 1881 census there were 135 people recorded with the Cullam surname, ranking it #16,515 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 7, ranked #37,967, down from #16,515 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Devonport Stonehouse, East, Clare and Tormoham with Torquay. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Cullam is 135 in 1881. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 94.8%.

1881 census count

135

Ranked #16,515

Modern count

7

2016, ranked #37,967

Peak year

1881

135 bearers

Map years

2

1881 to 1891

Key insights

  • Cullam had 135 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,515 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 7 in 2016, ranked #37,967.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 135 in 1881.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Cullam surname distribution map

The map shows where the Cullam surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Cullam surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Cullam over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 59 #22,756
1861 historical 8 #32,887
1881 historical 135 #16,515
1891 historical 102 #23,719
1901 historical 66 #26,794
1911 historical 34 #29,600
1997 modern 3 #38,317
1998 modern 4 #38,082
1999 modern 2 #38,551
2000 modern 2 #38,472
2001 modern 2 #38,335
2002 modern 3 #38,152
2003 modern 2 #38,424
2004 modern 4 #38,013
2005 modern 5 #37,885
2006 modern 5 #37,956
2007 modern 4 #38,169
2008 modern 5 #38,027
2009 modern 6 #37,953
2010 modern 5 #38,186
2011 modern 5 #38,168
2012 modern 6 #38,008
2013 modern 6 #38,049
2014 modern 6 #38,077
2015 modern 7 #37,920
2016 modern 7 #37,967

Geography

Back to top

Where Cullams are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Devonport Stonehouse, East, Clare, Tormoham with Torquay, St Philip and Jacob and St Mary Stratford-le-Bow. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Devonport Stonehouse, East Devon
2 Clare Suffolk
3 Tormoham with Torquay Devon
4 St Philip and Jacob Gloucestershire
5 St Mary Stratford-le-Bow London (East Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Cullam

These lists show first names that appear often with the Cullam surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Cullam

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Cullam, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Cullam surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Cullam household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Cullam is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Cullam is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Cullam, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Cullam families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Cullam surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 22 Cullams recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.68x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 22 1.68x
Lincolnshire 17 8.13x
Oxfordshire 16 19.82x
Durham 14 3.60x
Suffolk 12 7.54x
Berkshire 10 10.19x
Norfolk 7 3.48x
Gloucestershire 6 2.34x
Sussex 5 2.27x
Essex 4 1.55x
Devon 3 1.10x
Kent 3 0.67x
Lancashire 3 0.19x
Wiltshire 3 2.60x
Huntingdonshire 2 7.71x
Surrey 2 0.31x
Hertfordshire 1 1.11x
Leicestershire 1 0.69x
Monmouthshire 1 1.06x
Northumberland 1 0.51x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.57x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Great Grimsby in Lincolnshire leads with 17 Cullams recorded in 1881 and an index of 128.21x.

Place Total Index
Great Grimsby 17 128.21x
Clare 11 1447.37x
Bow London 9 54.09x
Burford 8 1142.86x
East Murton 8 1095.89x
Bristol St Philip Jacob 6 24.87x
Kensington London 6 8.26x
South Lynn 6 264.32x
Wheatley 6 1304.35x
Whitworth 6 210.53x
Brighton 5 11.25x
Shoreditch London 4 7.06x
South Hinksey 4 930.23x
Exeter Holy Trinity 3 280.37x
Rodbourne Cheney 3 337.08x
Bradfield 2 384.62x
Greenham 2 408.16x
Ramsgate 2 27.47x
South Ockendon 2 377.36x
Waresley 2 2000.00x
Abergavenny 1 28.25x
Basford 1 12.32x
Bucklebury 1 196.08x
Bury 1 5.64x
Clapham 1 6.12x
Great Yarmouth 1 6.01x
Hawkshead Monk Coniston 1 185.19x
Langford 1 588.24x
Little Totham 1 714.29x
Meldon 1 1428.57x
Oxford St Thomas 1 26.53x
Richmond 1 11.21x
Sonning 1 92.59x
St Albans St Peter 1 32.89x
St Clement Danes 1 47.17x
St George Hanover 1 5.86x
St Marylebone London 1 1.43x
Stretford 1 11.72x
Strood 1 39.37x
Walton 1 175.44x
West Ham 1 1.76x
Wymeswold 1 238.10x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Cullam surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Cullam surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 9
John 6
George 5
James 5
Charles 4
Thomas 4
Arthur 3
Edwin 3
Joseph 3
Edward 2
Mathew 2
Patrick 2
Wm. 2
Alfred 1
Chas. 1
Claude 1
Daniel 1
Francis 1
Fred 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Jeremiah 1
Luke 1
Matthew 1
Nevill 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1
Thos.J. 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Cullam surname: questions and answers

How common was the Cullam surname in 1881?

In 1881, 135 people were recorded with the Cullam surname. That placed it at #16,515 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Cullam surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 7 in 2016. That gives Cullam a modern rank of #37,967.

What does the Cullam map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Cullam bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.