NameCensus.

UK surname

Culham

In the 1881 census there were 184 people recorded with the Culham surname, ranking it #13,551 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 247, ranked #16,955, down from #13,551 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Leiston with Sizewell and Melton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include North Tyneside, Ipswich and Southend-on-Sea.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Culham is 347 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 34.2%.

1881 census count

184

Ranked #13,551

Modern count

247

2016, ranked #16,955

Peak year

1911

347 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Culham had 184 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,551 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 247 in 2016, ranked #16,955.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 347 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Culham surname distribution map

The map shows where the Culham surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Culham surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Culham over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 166 #11,986
1861 historical 240 #10,226
1881 historical 184 #13,551
1891 historical 249 #12,813
1901 historical 309 #11,418
1911 historical 347 #10,318
1997 modern 306 #13,353
1998 modern 310 #13,578
1999 modern 314 #13,556
2000 modern 299 #13,937
2001 modern 291 #14,000
2002 modern 290 #14,314
2003 modern 291 #14,100
2004 modern 283 #14,418
2005 modern 283 #14,343
2006 modern 250 #15,749
2007 modern 246 #16,086
2008 modern 249 #16,111
2009 modern 251 #16,368
2010 modern 261 #16,294
2011 modern 262 #16,098
2012 modern 251 #16,467
2013 modern 251 #16,734
2014 modern 253 #16,774
2015 modern 248 #16,905
2016 modern 247 #16,955

Geography

Back to top

Where Culhams are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Leiston with Sizewell, Melton and Orford, Gedgrave, Havergate Island. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to North Tyneside, Ipswich, Southend-on-Sea, Tendring and Tewkesbury. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Leiston with Sizewell Suffolk
3 London parishes London 3
4 Melton Suffolk
5 Orford, Gedgrave, Havergate Island Suffolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 North Tyneside 023 North Tyneside
2 Ipswich 013 Ipswich
3 Southend-on-Sea 014 Southend-on-Sea
4 Tendring 003 Tendring
5 Tewkesbury 005 Tewkesbury

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Culham

These lists show first names that appear often with the Culham surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Culham

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Culham, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Culham surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Culham household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Culham is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Culham is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Culham falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Culham is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Culham, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Culham families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Culham surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Suffolk leads with 71 Culhams recorded in 1881 and an index of 32.48x.

County Total Index
Suffolk 71 32.48x
Norfolk 32 11.60x
Surrey 27 3.09x
Middlesex 23 1.28x
Essex 11 3.10x
Yorkshire 9 0.51x
Hampshire 3 0.82x
Kent 2 0.33x
Sussex 2 0.66x
Wiltshire 2 1.26x
Cambridgeshire 1 0.88x
Lancashire 1 0.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Shotley in Suffolk leads with 16 Culhams recorded in 1881 and an index of 4102.56x.

Place Total Index
Shotley 16 4102.56x
Great Yarmouth 13 56.87x
Leiston 9 600.00x
Little Stonham 9 4736.84x
St Pancras London 9 6.23x
Bethnal Green London 8 10.26x
Pulham St Mary Magdalen 8 1159.42x
Battersea 7 10.60x
Orford 7 1000.00x
East Ham 6 91.19x
Penistone 6 431.65x
Lowestoft 5 48.40x
Melton 5 581.40x
Bermondsey 4 7.49x
Brantham 4 1600.00x
Ham Kingston On Thames 4 1052.63x
Rotherhithe 4 18.03x
Tacolnestone 4 1481.48x
Coulsdon 3 188.68x
Farnham 3 2727.27x
Halifax 3 11.49x
Kelsale 3 491.80x
Pamber 3 697.67x
Woodbridge 3 107.53x
Clapham 2 8.91x
Grays Thurrock 2 60.79x
Halesworth 2 129.03x
Kensington London 2 2.00x
New Buckenham 2 588.24x
Pulham St Mary Virgin 2 392.16x
Swindon 2 16.25x
Aldeburgh 1 77.52x
Beccles 1 28.41x
Broadwater 1 14.41x
Byfleet 1 128.21x
Charlton Next Woolwich 1 15.65x
Chelsea London 1 1.85x
Creeting All Sts 1 555.56x
Ely Holy Trinity St Mary 1 20.16x
Fundenhall 1 500.00x
Hackney London 1 0.99x
Hatfield Broad Oak 1 83.33x
Hove 1 7.53x
Ipswich St Mathew 1 16.31x
Kingston On Thames 1 4.76x
Leigh 1 81.30x
Lytham 1 30.77x
Riddlesworth 1 1666.67x
Romford 1 17.86x
St Dunstan In West 1 256.41x
Sutton At Hone 1 78.74x
Wickham Market 1 111.11x
Willesden 1 5.91x
Wimbledon 1 10.18x
Woodton 1 344.83x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Culham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 9
Elizabeth 6
Jane 6
Sarah 5
Eliza 4
Alice 3
Martha 3
Amy 2
Ann 2
Caroline 2
Clara 2
Eliz. 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Fanny 2
Frances 2
Laura 2
Maria 2
Maud 2
Rose 2
Ada 1
Anita 1
Beatrice 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Charoline 1
Elizth 1
Eva 1
Florence 1
Hanah 1
Hannah 1
Hariot 1
Harriet 1
Helen 1
Jemima 1
Joyce 1
Julia 1
Juliem 1
Leoni 1
Lily 1
Louisa 1
Matilda 1
Minnie 1
Nahamia 1
Priscilla 1
Rosalind 1
Rosy 1
Sophia 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Culham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Culham surname: questions and answers

How common was the Culham surname in 1881?

In 1881, 184 people were recorded with the Culham surname. That placed it at #13,551 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Culham surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 247 in 2016. That gives Culham a modern rank of #16,955.

What does the Culham map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Culham bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.