NameCensus.

UK surname

Denial

In the 1881 census there were 40 people recorded with the Denial surname, ranking it #28,011 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 108, ranked #29,578, down from #28,011 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Sheffield, Stockton-on-Tees and North East Derbyshire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Denial is 113 in 2014. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 170.0%.

1881 census count

40

Ranked #28,011

Modern count

108

2016, ranked #29,578

Peak year

2014

113 bearers

Map years

1

2016 to 2016

Key insights

  • Denial had 40 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #28,011 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 108 in 2016, ranked #29,578.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 69 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Denial surname distribution map

The map shows where the Denial surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Denial surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Denial over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 17 #30,267
1861 historical 33 #29,814
1881 historical 40 #28,011
1891 historical 69 #28,188
1901 historical 64 #27,010
1911 historical 65 #26,343
1997 modern 91 #28,215
1998 modern 94 #28,435
1999 modern 105 #27,035
2000 modern 100 #27,695
2001 modern 97 #27,823
2002 modern 102 #27,596
2003 modern 93 #28,829
2004 modern 99 #28,136
2005 modern 95 #28,817
2006 modern 93 #29,411
2007 modern 97 #29,156
2008 modern 94 #29,950
2009 modern 101 #29,445
2010 modern 103 #29,780
2011 modern 103 #29,589
2012 modern 101 #30,078
2013 modern 104 #30,076
2014 modern 113 #28,779
2015 modern 109 #29,327
2016 modern 108 #29,578

Geography

Back to top

Where Denials are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Sheffield, Stockton-on-Tees and North East Derbyshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Sheffield 006 Sheffield
2 Stockton-on-Tees 021 Stockton-on-Tees
3 Sheffield 075 Sheffield
4 Sheffield 065 Sheffield
5 North East Derbyshire 004 North East Derbyshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Denial

These lists show first names that appear often with the Denial surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Denial

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Denial, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Denial surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Denial household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburban Asian Communities

Group

Settled Semi-Detached Asians

Within London, Denial is most associated with areas classed as Settled Semi-Detached Asians, part of Suburban Asian Communities. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These residents share Supergroup characteristics of large (non-Chinese) Asian populations but those identifying as Bangladeshi are notably absent. Many residents were born in the UK, while other more recent migrants have African birthplaces. Semi-detached housing, much of it owner occupied, prevails in these suburban residential locations.

Wider London pattern

Many residents of these neighbourhoods are of (non-Chinese) Asian descent, with many identifying as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Neighbourhoods are located across large areas of suburban west, north-east and south London. Detached, semi-detached and terraced houses are more prevalent than flats and socially rented housing is uncommon. Few residents live in communal establishments. Many families have dependent children, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation, and few households are ethnically mixed. Marriage rates are above the London average. The even age distribution, relative absence of individuals living alone and frequent incidence of households with children suggests that multi-generation households may be relatively common. Employment is often in skilled trades, elementary, sales and customer service occupations, and roles as process, plant, and machine operatives. Manufacturing and construction are well represented, along with employment in distribution, hotels, and restaurants. Many adults have only level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. English is not used at home by some residents. Religious affiliation is above average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Denial is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Denial falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Denial is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 20-25 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

4
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Denial, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Denial families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Denial surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 25 Denials recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.47x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 25 6.47x
Lancashire 9 1.94x
Middlesex 5 1.28x
Huntingdonshire 1 12.92x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Brightside Bierlow in Yorkshire leads with 21 Denials recorded in 1881 and an index of 277.04x.

Place Total Index
Brightside Bierlow 21 277.04x
Blackburn 5 40.62x
Chadderton 4 176.99x
Chelsea London 3 25.53x
Nether Hallam 3 57.36x
Hammersmith London 2 20.81x
Huntingdon St John 1 454.55x
Upper Hallam 1 294.12x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Denial surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Alice 2
Annie 2
Mary 2
Ann 1
Bertha 1
Charlotte 1
Eliza 1
Ellen 1
Jane 1
Lily 1
Louisa 1
Lucy 1
Margaret 1
Martha 1
Minnie 1
Ruth 1
Susan 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Denial surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Denial households.

FAQ

Denial surname: questions and answers

How common was the Denial surname in 1881?

In 1881, 40 people were recorded with the Denial surname. That placed it at #28,011 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Denial surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 108 in 2016. That gives Denial a modern rank of #29,578.

What does the Denial map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Denial bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.