NameCensus.

UK surname

Flock

An English occupational surname for a shepherd or sheepshearer.

In the 1881 census there were 38 people recorded with the Flock surname, ranking it #28,285 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 37, ranked #35,582, down from #28,285 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, St Philip and Jacob and St Pancras. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Flock is 105 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 2.6%.

1881 census count

38

Ranked #28,285

Modern count

37

2016, ranked #35,582

Peak year

1861

105 bearers

Map years

1

1861 to 1861

Key insights

  • Flock had 38 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #28,285 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 37 in 2016, ranked #35,582.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 105 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Flock surname distribution map

The map shows where the Flock surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Flock surname density by area, 1861 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Flock over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 72 #20,720
1861 historical 105 #20,298
1881 historical 38 #28,285
1891 historical 73 #27,677
1901 historical 43 #29,380
1911 historical 63 #26,537
1997 modern 45 #33,168
1998 modern 46 #33,286
1999 modern 40 #33,967
2000 modern 41 #33,889
2001 modern 36 #34,171
2002 modern 41 #34,032
2003 modern 39 #34,296
2004 modern 40 #34,387
2005 modern 39 #34,652
2006 modern 44 #34,568
2007 modern 45 #34,699
2008 modern 46 #34,759
2009 modern 40 #35,274
2010 modern 40 #35,403
2011 modern 39 #35,444
2012 modern 39 #35,415
2013 modern 41 #35,384
2014 modern 40 #35,454
2015 modern 39 #35,472
2016 modern 37 #35,582

Geography

Back to top

Where Flocks are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, St Philip and Jacob, St Pancras, Croydon, Battersea (Penge), Sanderstead and Fulham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 St Philip and Jacob Gloucestershire
3 St Pancras London (North Districts)
4 Croydon, Battersea (Penge), Sanderstead Surrey
5 Fulham London (West Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Flock

These lists show first names that appear often with the Flock surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Flock

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Flock, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Flock surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Flock household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Flock is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Flock is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Flock, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Flock

The surname Flock is believed to have originated in England, specifically in the northern counties of Yorkshire and Lancashire. It first appeared around the 13th century and is thought to be derived from the Old English word "flocc," meaning a flock or group of people or animals.

One of the earliest recorded mentions of the name Flock can be found in the Wakefield Court Rolls of 1275, where a Robert Flok is listed as a landowner. The surname also appears in the Yorkshire Poll Tax Returns of 1379, suggesting a long history in the region.

The name Flock may have initially been used as a descriptive surname, referring to someone who worked with or tended to flocks of sheep or other livestock. It could also have been used as a nickname for someone who was known to gather or lead groups of people.

In the 16th century, the surname Flock was found in various records across Yorkshire, including the Parish Registers of Guiseley, where a Thomas Flocke was recorded in 1564. The name also appeared in the records of the nearby town of Otley, where a John Flocke was listed in 1587.

One notable individual with the surname Flock was Sir John Flock (1602-1678), an English politician and Member of Parliament for Nottingham during the English Civil War. He was a staunch Royalist and supported King Charles I, for which he was later imprisoned by the Parliamentarians.

Another historically significant bearer of the name was James Flock (1751-1819), a British naval officer who served in the Royal Navy during the American Revolutionary War and the Napoleonic Wars. He was renowned for his bravery and leadership, earning several promotions and honors throughout his career.

In the literary world, the novelist and poet John Flock (1828-1904) gained recognition for his works depicting rural life in Yorkshire. His best-known novel, "The Dalesfolk," published in 1867, was praised for its authentic portrayal of the Yorkshire countryside and its inhabitants.

The surname Flock also has connections to the town of Flock, located in the East Riding of Yorkshire. While the town's name may have influenced the surname, the exact relationship between the two is unclear.

Other notable individuals with the surname Flock include William Flock (1857-1932), a British architect responsible for designing several churches and public buildings in Yorkshire, and Emily Flock (1889-1976), a pioneering female physician who established one of the first women's health clinics in London.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Flock families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Flock surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 16 Flocks recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.47x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 16 5.47x
Renfrewshire 6 26.48x
Suffolk 4 11.23x
Kent 3 3.01x
Bedfordshire 1 6.61x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Eastwood in Renfrewshire leads with 6 Flocks recorded in 1881 and an index of 428.57x.

Place Total Index
Eastwood 6 428.57x
St George Martyr London 6 1016.95x
Hackney London 4 24.41x
Ipswich St Margaret 4 330.58x
Deptford St Paul 1 12.99x
Hammersmith London 1 13.89x
Kensington London 1 6.15x
Luton 1 38.17x
Maidstone 1 33.67x
Mile End Old Town London 1 16.08x
St George In East London 1 36.36x
St Marylebone London 1 6.41x
Stoke Newington London 1 43.86x
Woolwich 1 27.10x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Flock surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 3
Esther 2
Alice 1
Amy 1
Annie 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Florence 1
Karen 1
Martha 1
Sussanah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Flock surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Albert 2
Thomas 2
William 2
Arthur 1
Harry 1
Henry 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Flock households.

FAQ

Flock surname: questions and answers

How common was the Flock surname in 1881?

In 1881, 38 people were recorded with the Flock surname. That placed it at #28,285 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Flock surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 37 in 2016. That gives Flock a modern rank of #35,582.

What does the Flock surname mean?

An English occupational surname for a shepherd or sheepshearer.

What does the Flock map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Flock bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.