NameCensus.

UK surname

Fouler

In the 1881 census there were 68 people recorded with the Fouler surname, ranking it #23,950 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 6, ranked #38,110, down from #23,950 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Toxteth Park, St Pancras and Edinburgh. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Fouler is 119 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 91.2%.

1881 census count

68

Ranked #23,950

Modern count

6

2016, ranked #38,110

Peak year

1851

119 bearers

Map years

1

1851 to 1851

Key insights

  • Fouler had 68 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,950 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016, ranked #38,110.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 119 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Fouler surname distribution map

The map shows where the Fouler surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Fouler surname density by area, 1851 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Fouler over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 119 #15,247
1861 historical 81 #23,431
1881 historical 68 #23,950
1891 historical 85 #26,080
1901 historical 76 #25,734
1911 historical 63 #26,537
1997 modern 1 #38,839
1998 modern 5 #37,861
1999 modern 3 #38,318
2000 modern 9 #37,119
2001 modern 3 #38,091
2002 modern 4 #37,921
2003 modern 4 #37,951
2004 modern 3 #38,241
2005 modern 3 #38,312
2006 modern 2 #38,590
2007 modern 3 #38,372
2008 modern 3 #38,396
2009 modern 6 #37,953
2010 modern 6 #38,024
2011 modern 7 #37,865
2012 modern 4 #38,335
2013 modern 5 #38,195
2014 modern 5 #38,228
2015 modern 6 #38,076
2016 modern 6 #38,110

Geography

Back to top

Where Foulers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Toxteth Park, St Pancras, Edinburgh, Rhuddlan and St John Hackney. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Toxteth Park Lancashire
2 St Pancras London (North Districts)
3 Edinburgh Edinburgh
4 Rhuddlan Denbighshire
5 St John Hackney London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Fouler

These lists show first names that appear often with the Fouler surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Fouler

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Fouler, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Fouler surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Fouler household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Fouler is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Fouler is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Fouler, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Fouler families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Fouler surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Fife leads with 12 Foulers recorded in 1881 and an index of 31.02x.

County Total Index
Fife 12 31.02x
Middlesex 10 1.53x
Flintshire 9 51.22x
Hampshire 5 3.73x
Sussex 4 3.63x
Durham 3 1.54x
Ross-shire 3 16.71x
Surrey 3 0.94x
Lancashire 2 0.26x
Northamptonshire 2 3.25x
Shropshire 2 3.54x
Warwickshire 2 1.21x
Yorkshire 2 0.31x
Berkshire 1 2.04x
Buckinghamshire 1 2.53x
Cheshire 1 0.69x
Cumberland 1 1.78x
Glamorgan 1 0.88x
Hertfordshire 1 2.22x
Midlothian 1 1.14x
Staffordshire 1 0.45x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Wemyss in Fife leads with 10 Foulers recorded in 1881 and an index of 609.76x.

Place Total Index
Wemyss 10 609.76x
Hackney London 8 21.83x
Rhuddlan 6 387.10x
Holdenhurst 5 142.45x
Eastbourne 4 78.90x
Killearnan 3 1250.00x
Rhuddlan Rhyl 3 2500.00x
Birmingham 2 3.64x
Eye 2 689.66x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 2 23.75x
Leeds 2 5.47x
Leuchars 2 408.16x
Prees 2 289.86x
Bradford 1 27.55x
Cookham 1 65.36x
Croydon 1 5.66x
Edinburgh St Cuthberts 1 2.84x
Friern Barnet 1 69.44x
Kimpton 1 476.19x
Monkwearmouth Shore 1 26.32x
North Meols 1 13.18x
Northen Etchells 1 588.24x
Olney 1 181.82x
Sutton 1 43.48x
Tottenham 1 9.61x
Witley 1 454.55x
Wolstanton Chesterton 1 88.50x
Workington 1 31.06x
Ystradyfodwg 1 10.02x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Fouler surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 4
Emma 3
Charlotte 2
Sarah 2
Ada 1
Agnes 1
Alice 1
Ann 1
Annie 1
Bertha 1
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Edith 1
Eliz. 1
Eliza 1
Ellen 1
Hannah 1
Jane 1
Kate 1
Katie 1
Laura 1
Louisa 1
Lucy 1
Margret 1
Minie 1
Rachel 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Fouler surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 4
George 2
Thomas 2
Albert 1
Charles 1
Edward 1
Fredrick 1
Geo. 1
Henry 1
Joseph 1
Montague 1
Richard 1
Wilkinson 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Fouler households.

FAQ

Fouler surname: questions and answers

How common was the Fouler surname in 1881?

In 1881, 68 people were recorded with the Fouler surname. That placed it at #23,950 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Fouler surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016. That gives Fouler a modern rank of #38,110.

What does the Fouler map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Fouler bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.