NameCensus.

UK surname

Frankcom

In the 1881 census there were 105 people recorded with the Frankcom surname, ranking it #19,183 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 242, ranked #17,177, up from #19,183 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Wraxhall, North and Yardley. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include South Gloucestershire, Bristol and Stroud.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Frankcom is 274 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 130.5%.

1881 census count

105

Ranked #19,183

Modern count

242

2016, ranked #17,177

Peak year

1901

274 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Frankcom had 105 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #19,183 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 242 in 2016, ranked #17,177.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 274 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Frankcom surname distribution map

The map shows where the Frankcom surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Frankcom surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Frankcom over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 53 #23,739
1861 historical 65 #25,618
1881 historical 105 #19,183
1891 historical 164 #17,205
1901 historical 274 #12,370
1911 historical 264 #12,449
1997 modern 247 #15,399
1998 modern 259 #15,320
1999 modern 262 #15,308
2000 modern 248 #15,827
2001 modern 236 #16,094
2002 modern 250 #15,819
2003 modern 238 #16,144
2004 modern 242 #16,050
2005 modern 236 #16,286
2006 modern 228 #16,789
2007 modern 233 #16,752
2008 modern 234 #16,827
2009 modern 245 #16,646
2010 modern 256 #16,523
2011 modern 253 #16,493
2012 modern 249 #16,572
2013 modern 248 #16,877
2014 modern 247 #17,035
2015 modern 244 #17,090
2016 modern 242 #17,177

Geography

Back to top

Where Frankcoms are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Wraxhall, North, Yardley, Hawkesbury and St Philip and Jacob. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to South Gloucestershire, Bristol, Stroud and Bath and North East Somerset. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 Wraxhall, North Wiltshire
3 Yardley Warwickshire
4 Hawkesbury Gloucestershire
5 St Philip and Jacob Gloucestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 South Gloucestershire 011 South Gloucestershire
2 Bristol 008 Bristol, City of
3 Stroud 011 Stroud
4 Bath and North East Somerset 015 Bath and North East Somerset
5 South Gloucestershire 024 South Gloucestershire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Frankcom

These lists show first names that appear often with the Frankcom surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Frankcom

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Frankcom, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Frankcom surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Frankcom household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Frankcom is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Frankcom is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Frankcom falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Frankcom is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Frankcom, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Frankcom families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Frankcom surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Gloucestershire leads with 68 Frankcoms recorded in 1881 and an index of 33.85x.

County Total Index
Gloucestershire 68 33.85x
Wiltshire 12 13.25x
Middlesex 9 0.88x
Surrey 6 1.20x
Warwickshire 5 1.94x
Somerset 3 1.82x
Derbyshire 2 1.25x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Dyrham Hinton in Gloucestershire leads with 17 Frankcoms recorded in 1881 and an index of 12142.86x.

Place Total Index
Dyrham Hinton 17 12142.86x
Hawkesbury 17 2500.00x
Pucklechurch 13 2888.89x
Bristol St Philip Jacob 10 52.88x
North Wraxall 8 5000.00x
Westbury On Trym 7 102.79x
Islington London 6 6.04x
Aston 5 7.03x
Battersea 5 13.27x
Sherston Magna 4 727.27x
Bedminster 3 19.37x
Paddington London 3 7.97x
Bristol St Augustine 2 61.73x
Litchurch 2 31.01x
Marshfield 2 370.37x
Kingston On Thames 1 8.34x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Frankcom surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 7
Mary 5
Annie 3
Elizabeth 3
Ellen 3
Hester 3
Jane 3
Eliza 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Alice 1
Angelina 1
Ann 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Fanny 1
Florance 1
Florence 1
Hannah 1
Isabel 1
Janetta 1
Lilian 1
Martha 1
Millicent 1
Nellie 1
Rachel 1
Rosina 1
Stephanna 1
Susan 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Frankcom surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 4
George 3
Henry 3
Samuel 3
Charles 2
Edward 2
Francis 2
Herbert 2
James 2
Jesse 2
Richard 2
Sydney 2
Walter 2
William 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Benjamin 1
Ernest 1
Evan 1
Fred 1
Fred. 1
Fred.Ed. 1
Harry 1
Hy.S. 1
Isaac 1
Job 1
Joseph 1
Maurice 1
Nathaniel 1
Robert 1
Thomas 1
Wm.J. 1

FAQ

Frankcom surname: questions and answers

How common was the Frankcom surname in 1881?

In 1881, 105 people were recorded with the Frankcom surname. That placed it at #19,183 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Frankcom surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 242 in 2016. That gives Frankcom a modern rank of #17,177.

What does the Frankcom map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Frankcom bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.