NameCensus.

UK surname

Freezer

In the 1881 census there were 77 people recorded with the Freezer surname, ranking it #22,617 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 145, ranked #24,293, down from #22,617 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Stanfield, Gressenhall, Longham and Syderstone. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include South Northamptonshire, Ashford and Breckland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Freezer is 161 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 88.3%.

1881 census count

77

Ranked #22,617

Modern count

145

2016, ranked #24,293

Peak year

1998

161 bearers

Map years

4

1911 to 2016

Key insights

  • Freezer had 77 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #22,617 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 145 in 2016, ranked #24,293.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 110 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Freezer surname distribution map

The map shows where the Freezer surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Freezer surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Freezer over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 34 #27,194
1861 historical 61 #26,170
1881 historical 77 #22,617
1891 historical 78 #27,035
1901 historical 86 #24,508
1911 historical 110 #21,519
1997 modern 155 #20,684
1998 modern 161 #20,754
1999 modern 160 #20,943
2000 modern 160 #20,903
2001 modern 153 #21,197
2002 modern 155 #21,431
2003 modern 160 #20,789
2004 modern 157 #21,168
2005 modern 152 #21,572
2006 modern 158 #21,229
2007 modern 154 #21,804
2008 modern 145 #22,929
2009 modern 154 #22,536
2010 modern 158 #22,692
2011 modern 152 #23,101
2012 modern 143 #24,019
2013 modern 149 #23,765
2014 modern 145 #24,395
2015 modern 141 #24,723
2016 modern 145 #24,293

Geography

Back to top

Where Freezers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Stanfield, Gressenhall, Longham, Syderstone, Hythe St Leonard, Cheriton, Newington, Saltwood, West Hythe, Burmarsh and Holkham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to South Northamptonshire, Ashford, Breckland and Mansfield. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Stanfield Norfolk
2 Gressenhall, Longham Norfolk
3 Syderstone Norfolk
4 Hythe St Leonard, Cheriton, Newington, Saltwood, West Hythe, Burmarsh Kent
5 Holkham Norfolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 South Northamptonshire 001 South Northamptonshire
2 Ashford 001 Ashford
3 Breckland 004 Breckland
4 Breckland 007 Breckland
5 Mansfield 007 Mansfield

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Freezer

These lists show first names that appear often with the Freezer surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Freezer

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Freezer, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Freezer surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Freezer household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Freezer is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Freezer is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Freezer falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Freezer is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Freezer, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Freezer families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Freezer surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 53 Freezers recorded in 1881 and an index of 45.89x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 53 45.89x
Kent 8 3.12x
Lancashire 7 0.79x
Surrey 6 1.64x
Cambridgeshire 3 6.31x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Gressenhall in Norfolk leads with 18 Freezers recorded in 1881 and an index of 8571.43x.

Place Total Index
Gressenhall 18 8571.43x
Cheriton 8 769.23x
Holkham 8 5714.29x
Castleton 7 78.65x
Camberwell 6 12.51x
East Dereham 6 410.96x
Heigham 4 64.52x
Scarning 4 2352.94x
Syderstone 4 3076.92x
Beetley 3 3333.33x
St Andrewthe Less 3 55.15x
Stanfield 3 6000.00x
Melton Constable 2 6666.67x
Docking 1 277.78x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Freezer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 4
Elizabeth 3
Sarah 3
Alice 2
Annie 2
Ellen 2
Emma 2
Hannah 2
Martha 2
Ada 1
Ann 1
Anne 1
Betsy 1
Christiana 1
Clara 1
Eliza 1
Elizth. 1
Frances 1
Heather 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Louisa 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Rose 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Freezer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
James 8
William 5
Robert 4
John 3
Thomas 3
Geo. 2
Richard 2
Samuel 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Beoine 1
Edward 1
Frank 1
George 1
Leonard 1
Nimrod 1
Stephen 1
Thornvilla 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Freezer households.

FAQ

Freezer surname: questions and answers

How common was the Freezer surname in 1881?

In 1881, 77 people were recorded with the Freezer surname. That placed it at #22,617 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Freezer surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 145 in 2016. That gives Freezer a modern rank of #24,293.

What does the Freezer map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Freezer bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.