NameCensus.

UK surname

Froot

In the 1881 census there were 6 people recorded with the Froot surname, ranking it #32,926 among surnames in the records.

The strongest historical links point to Wheatacre All Saints, Bury and St Leonard Shoreditch. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Froot is 207 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has changed.

1881 census count

6

Ranked #32,926

Modern count

-

Peak year

1891

207 bearers

Map years

1

1891 to 1891

Key insights

  • Froot had 6 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #32,926 surname in that year.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 207 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Froot surname distribution map

The map shows where the Froot surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Froot surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Froot over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 34 #27,194
1861 historical 13 #32,208
1881 historical 6 #32,926
1891 historical 207 #14,546
1901 historical 14 #32,506
1911 historical 35 #29,478

Geography

Back to top

Where Froots are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wheatacre All Saints, Bury, St Leonard Shoreditch, Aldridge and Harpole. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wheatacre All Saints Norfolk
2 Bury Lancashire
3 St Leonard Shoreditch London (East Districts)
4 Aldridge Staffordshire
5 Harpole Northamptonshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Froot

These lists show first names that appear often with the Froot surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Froot

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Froot, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Froot surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Froot household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Froot is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Froot is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Unknown

This describes the area pattern most associated with Froot, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Froot families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Froot surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 4 Froots recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.85x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 4 6.85x
Lancashire 1 1.44x
Surrey 1 3.51x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Islington London in Middlesex leads with 4 Froots recorded in 1881 and an index of 70.67x.

Place Total Index
Islington London 4 70.67x
Croydon 1 63.29x
Preston 1 54.05x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Froot surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 3

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Froot surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Frances 1
Henry 1
John 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Froot households.

FAQ

Froot surname: questions and answers

How common was the Froot surname in 1881?

In 1881, 6 people were recorded with the Froot surname. That placed it at #32,926 in the surname rankings for that year.

What does the Froot map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Froot bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.