NameCensus.

UK surname

Frosdick

In the 1881 census there were 187 people recorded with the Frosdick surname, ranking it #13,407 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 347, ranked #13,259, up from #13,407 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Rollesby, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside and St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include South Norfolk, Great Yarmouth and Northumberland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Frosdick is 377 in 2000. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 85.6%.

1881 census count

187

Ranked #13,407

Modern count

347

2016, ranked #13,259

Peak year

2000

377 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Frosdick had 187 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,407 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 347 in 2016, ranked #13,259.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 298 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Frosdick surname distribution map

The map shows where the Frosdick surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Frosdick surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Frosdick over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 89 #18,446
1861 historical 118 #18,512
1881 historical 187 #13,407
1891 historical 214 #14,214
1901 historical 255 #12,965
1911 historical 298 #11,505
1997 modern 360 #11,929
1998 modern 371 #12,027
1999 modern 372 #12,076
2000 modern 377 #11,903
2001 modern 358 #12,181
2002 modern 370 #12,121
2003 modern 347 #12,479
2004 modern 338 #12,781
2005 modern 323 #13,133
2006 modern 336 #12,842
2007 modern 336 #12,975
2008 modern 342 #12,933
2009 modern 356 #12,800
2010 modern 364 #12,851
2011 modern 351 #13,059
2012 modern 350 #12,965
2013 modern 359 #12,917
2014 modern 346 #13,370
2015 modern 343 #13,365
2016 modern 347 #13,259

Geography

Back to top

Where Frosdicks are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Rollesby, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju, Stokesby with Herringby and Surlingham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to South Norfolk, Great Yarmouth and Northumberland. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Rollesby Norfolk
2 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
3 St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju Norfolk
4 Stokesby with Herringby Norfolk
5 Surlingham Norfolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 South Norfolk 008 South Norfolk
2 Great Yarmouth 003 Great Yarmouth
3 Great Yarmouth 002 Great Yarmouth
4 Great Yarmouth 011 Great Yarmouth
5 Northumberland 003 Northumberland

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Frosdick

These lists show first names that appear often with the Frosdick surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Frosdick

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Frosdick, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Frosdick surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Frosdick household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Frosdick is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Frosdick is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Frosdick falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Frosdick is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Frosdick, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Frosdick families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Frosdick surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 149 Frosdicks recorded in 1881 and an index of 53.13x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 149 53.13x
Durham 13 2.40x
Suffolk 11 4.95x
Yorkshire 9 0.50x
Essex 2 0.56x
Sussex 2 0.65x
Middlesex 1 0.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Great Yarmouth in Norfolk leads with 20 Frosdicks recorded in 1881 and an index of 86.10x.

Place Total Index
Great Yarmouth 20 86.10x
Surlingham 19 6333.33x
Stokesby With Herringby 14 6666.67x
Gorleston 11 195.04x
Acle 10 1754.39x
Bergh Apton 10 3448.28x
Conside Knitsley 10 236.97x
Rollesby 10 2857.14x
Ashby St Mary 8 6666.67x
Bunwell 8 1481.48x
Leeds 8 7.84x
Trowse Cum Newton 8 1159.42x
East Ruston 6 1428.57x
Caistor Next Yarmouth 5 505.05x
Filby 4 1111.11x
Stalham 4 740.74x
Thorpe Next Norwich 4 134.68x
Ebchester 3 357.14x
Reedham 3 555.56x
Swainsthorpe 3 1578.95x
Denton 2 666.67x
Hemsby 2 500.00x
Norwich St Michael At 2 122.70x
Sporle With Palgrave 2 434.78x
Arminghall 1 1428.57x
Carleton Rode 1 208.33x
Heigham 1 6.64x
Huddersfield 1 3.80x
Lawford 1 192.31x
North Walsham 1 49.51x
Norwich St John Timberhill 1 133.33x
Norwich St Stephen 1 38.91x
St Pancras London 1 0.68x
Strumpshaw 1 400.00x
Thorpe 1 263.16x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Frosdick surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Frosdick surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 10
George 8
James 7
John 7
Henry 6
Richard 5
Robert 5
Walter 5
Thomas 4
Albert 3
Edward 3
Joseph 3
Ambrose 2
Arthur 2
Benjaman 2
Benjamin 2
Isaac 2
Aurther 1
Auther 1
Celam 1
Charles 1
Clement 1
Daniel 1
Dennes 1
Earnest 1
Ebenezer 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Frederic 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
M.James 1
Moses 1
Samuel 1

FAQ

Frosdick surname: questions and answers

How common was the Frosdick surname in 1881?

In 1881, 187 people were recorded with the Frosdick surname. That placed it at #13,407 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Frosdick surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 347 in 2016. That gives Frosdick a modern rank of #13,259.

What does the Frosdick map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Frosdick bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.