NameCensus.

UK surname

Goshawk

In the 1881 census there were 128 people recorded with the Goshawk surname, ranking it #17,079 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 110, ranked #29,225, down from #17,079 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Cockfield, London parishes and Creake, North. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Babergh, St Edmundsbury and South Hams.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Goshawk is 150 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 14.1%.

1881 census count

128

Ranked #17,079

Modern count

110

2016, ranked #29,225

Peak year

1911

150 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Goshawk had 128 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,079 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 110 in 2016, ranked #29,225.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 150 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Goshawk surname distribution map

The map shows where the Goshawk surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Goshawk surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Goshawk over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 89 #18,446
1861 historical 95 #21,768
1881 historical 128 #17,079
1891 historical 129 #20,285
1901 historical 120 #20,545
1911 historical 150 #17,866
1997 modern 117 #24,553
1998 modern 117 #25,190
1999 modern 128 #24,017
2000 modern 119 #25,072
2001 modern 119 #24,733
2002 modern 119 #25,231
2003 modern 109 #26,361
2004 modern 107 #26,899
2005 modern 109 #26,583
2006 modern 107 #27,179
2007 modern 114 #26,491
2008 modern 108 #27,684
2009 modern 117 #26,927
2010 modern 121 #27,005
2011 modern 120 #26,930
2012 modern 107 #29,017
2013 modern 109 #29,209
2014 modern 109 #29,452
2015 modern 106 #29,895
2016 modern 110 #29,225

Geography

Back to top

Where Goshawks are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Cockfield, London parishes, Creake, North, Harrow-on-the-Hill and St Mary Islington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Babergh, St Edmundsbury, South Hams, Kingston upon Thames and Redbridge. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Cockfield Suffolk
2 London parishes London 3
3 Creake, North Norfolk
4 Harrow-on-the-Hill Middlesex (Exclusive Of London Districts)
5 St Mary Islington London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Babergh 001 Babergh
2 St Edmundsbury 002 St Edmundsbury
3 South Hams 006 South Hams
4 Kingston upon Thames 020 Kingston upon Thames
5 Redbridge 001 Redbridge

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Goshawk

These lists show first names that appear often with the Goshawk surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Goshawk

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Goshawk, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Goshawk surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Goshawk household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Goshawk is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Goshawk is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Goshawk falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Goshawk is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Goshawk, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Goshawk families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Goshawk surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 40 Goshawks recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.20x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 40 3.20x
Suffolk 24 15.78x
Norfolk 22 11.46x
Berkshire 7 7.47x
Yorkshire 7 0.57x
Cambridgeshire 6 7.59x
Essex 5 2.03x
Gloucestershire 5 2.04x
Kent 4 0.94x
Surrey 3 0.49x
Angus 1 0.86x
Devon 1 0.38x
Hampshire 1 0.39x
Hertfordshire 1 1.16x
Sussex 1 0.48x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bradfield St Clare in Suffolk leads with 14 Goshawks recorded in 1881 and an index of 12727.27x.

Place Total Index
Bradfield St Clare 14 12727.27x
North Elmham 8 1702.13x
Clewer 7 182.29x
Mile End Old Town London 7 26.35x
Islington London 6 4.96x
St Pancras London 6 5.97x
Stoke Newington London 6 61.67x
Cheltenham 5 26.47x
Elland Cum Greetland 5 89.77x
East Dereham 4 164.61x
Harrow 4 209.42x
Harrow On The Hill 4 160.64x
North Creake 4 1538.46x
Sutton 4 606.06x
Brancaster 3 909.09x
Colchester St Peter 3 303.03x
Hackney London 3 4.29x
Lewisham 3 13.20x
Bradfield St George 2 1052.63x
Bromley London 2 7.28x
Lambeth 2 1.84x
Long Melford 2 141.84x
Normanby In 2 60.42x
North Shoebury 2 2500.00x
Norwich St Stephen 2 113.64x
Rougham 2 571.43x
St Andrewthe Less 2 22.12x
St Mary Woolnoth London 2 3333.33x
Swefling 2 1666.67x
Alpheton 1 909.09x
Brighton 1 2.35x
Cockington 1 666.67x
Dundee 1 2.32x
Faversham 1 24.63x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 1 17.36x
Newmarket St Mary 1 85.47x
Portsea 1 1.99x
Watford 1 14.99x
Wimbledon 1 14.64x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Goshawk surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 10
Mary 8
Hannah 3
Alice 2
Annie 2
Edith 2
Eliza 2
Emily 2
Fanny 2
Harriet 2
Jane 2
Louisa 2
Sarah 2
Susannah 2
Ada 1
Agnes 1
Amelia 1
Ann 1
Anne 1
Beatrice 1
Caroline 1
Charotte 1
Clara 1
E.Ann 1
Flora 1
Gertd. 1
Harriett 1
Henrietta 1
Louie 1
Lucy 1
Lydia 1
Mahala 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Marian 1
Martha 1
Maude 1
Millicent 1
Sushannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Goshawk surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Goshawk surname: questions and answers

How common was the Goshawk surname in 1881?

In 1881, 128 people were recorded with the Goshawk surname. That placed it at #17,079 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Goshawk surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 110 in 2016. That gives Goshawk a modern rank of #29,225.

What does the Goshawk map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Goshawk bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.