NameCensus.

UK surname

Grossmith

In the 1881 census there were 218 people recorded with the Grossmith surname, ranking it #12,158 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 133, ranked #25,765, down from #12,158 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, St Pancras and Alverstoke, Gosport, Rowner. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Reigate and Banstead, Cheshire East and Bromley.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Grossmith is 312 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 39.0%.

1881 census count

218

Ranked #12,158

Modern count

133

2016, ranked #25,765

Peak year

1911

312 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Grossmith had 218 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #12,158 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 133 in 2016, ranked #25,765.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 312 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Outer Suburbs.

Grossmith surname distribution map

The map shows where the Grossmith surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Grossmith surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Grossmith over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 117 #15,456
1861 historical 142 #15,982
1881 historical 218 #12,158
1891 historical 272 #11,957
1901 historical 270 #12,492
1911 historical 312 #11,130
1997 modern 192 #18,103
1998 modern 193 #18,511
1999 modern 182 #19,317
2000 modern 183 #19,239
2001 modern 178 #19,288
2002 modern 182 #19,411
2003 modern 183 #19,152
2004 modern 183 #19,251
2005 modern 158 #21,052
2006 modern 155 #21,477
2007 modern 154 #21,804
2008 modern 154 #22,034
2009 modern 155 #22,438
2010 modern 160 #22,487
2011 modern 150 #23,309
2012 modern 142 #24,148
2013 modern 140 #24,779
2014 modern 139 #25,093
2015 modern 138 #25,103
2016 modern 133 #25,765

Geography

Back to top

Where Grossmiths are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, St Pancras, Alverstoke, Gosport, Rowner and Lambeth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Reigate and Banstead, Cheshire East, Bromley and St Albans. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 London parishes London 3
3 St Pancras London (North Districts)
4 Alverstoke, Gosport, Rowner Hampshire
5 Lambeth London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Reigate and Banstead 005 Reigate and Banstead
2 Cheshire East 002 Cheshire East
3 Bromley 007 Bromley
4 St Albans 006 St Albans
5 Reigate and Banstead 006 Reigate and Banstead

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Grossmith

These lists show first names that appear often with the Grossmith surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Grossmith

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Grossmith, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals

Group

Outer Suburbs

Nationally, the Grossmith surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Outer Suburbs, within Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals. This does not mean every Grossmith household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods are found on the outer edges of many towns and cities. Many residents were born outside the UK. Indian ethnic group representation is high. There are high numbers of families with dependent children aged 5 to 14. Incidences of disability and of provision of unpaid care are low. Neighbourhoods provide a mix of detached housing and flats, and terraced housing is not uncommon. Levels of overcrowding are low and homeownership rates are high. Professional and managerial occupations are prevalent: unemployment is low and education to degree level is the norm.

Wider pattern

Those working within the managerial, professional and administrative occupations typically reflect a wide range of ethnic groups, and reside in detached or semi-detached housing. Their residential locations at the edges of cities and conurbations and car-based lifestyles are more characteristic of Supergroup membership than birthplace or participation in child-rearing. Houses are typically owner-occupied and marriage rates are lower than the national average. This Supergroup is found throughout suburban UK.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Grossmith is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Grossmith is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Grossmith falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Grossmith is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Grossmith, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Grossmith families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Grossmith surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 77 Grossmiths recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.60x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 77 3.60x
Hampshire 43 9.82x
Surrey 39 3.75x
Sussex 23 6.39x
Lancashire 7 0.28x
Northamptonshire 7 3.48x
Shropshire 7 3.79x
Essex 5 1.19x
Glamorgan 3 0.81x
Hertfordshire 2 1.36x
Kent 2 0.27x
Yorkshire 2 0.09x
Gloucestershire 1 0.24x
Royal Navy 1 3.93x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Brighton in Sussex leads with 23 Grossmiths recorded in 1881 and an index of 31.65x.

Place Total Index
Brighton 23 31.65x
St Marylebone London 17 14.91x
Portsea 16 18.65x
Hackney London 11 9.19x
Bishops Waltham 9 494.51x
Clerkenwell London 9 17.85x
Whitechapel London 9 42.74x
Christchurch 8 84.30x
Croydon 8 13.85x
Lambeth 8 4.30x
St Pancras London 8 4.65x
Weybridge 7 313.90x
Alverstoke 5 31.55x
Islington London 5 2.42x
West Derby 5 6.74x
Woodham Ferris 5 1020.41x
Aldershot 4 27.27x
Ashton In Stumford 4 5000.00x
Battersea 4 5.09x
Camberwell 4 2.93x
Madeley 4 59.08x
Newington 4 5.07x
Paddington London 4 5.09x
Bethnal Green London 3 3.23x
Peterborough 3 20.62x
Swansea Higher 3 77.52x
Tottenham 3 8.82x
Acklam With Barthorpe 2 952.38x
Clapham 2 7.49x
Hendon 2 26.01x
Quatt Jervis 2 1333.33x
St Gilesin Fields London 2 110.50x
Bristol St James St Paul 1 7.16x
Bushey 1 28.49x
Epsom 1 19.72x
Erith 1 13.93x
Everton 1 1.24x
Hammersmith London 1 1.90x
Hatfield 1 33.56x
Kensington London 1 0.84x
Milton In Gravesend 1 9.15x
Newport 1 44.84x
Royal Navy 1 4.60x
Southampton St Mary 1 3.63x
St Clement Danes London 1 22.62x
St Giles In Fields London 1 9.54x
Toxteth Park 1 1.17x
Wimbledon 1 8.55x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Grossmith surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Grossmith surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 13
George 12
John 9
Charles 5
James 5
Samuel 5
Thomas 5
Frederick 3
Henry 3
Alfred 2
Chas. 2
Ernest 2
Harry 2
Robt. 2
Wm. 2
Abraham 1
Algernon 1
Arthur 1
Barnett 1
Chas.B. 1
Douglas 1
Edmond 1
Frederic 1
Fredk. 1
Geo. 1
Graham 1
H. 1
Herbert 1
Jesse 1
Jonas 1
Lawrence 1
Moses 1
Percy 1
Reginald 1
Robert 1
Sidney 1
Simon 1
Sydney 1
W. 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Grossmith surname: questions and answers

How common was the Grossmith surname in 1881?

In 1881, 218 people were recorded with the Grossmith surname. That placed it at #12,158 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Grossmith surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 133 in 2016. That gives Grossmith a modern rank of #25,765.

What does the Grossmith map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Grossmith bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.