NameCensus.

UK surname

Hammersly

In the 1881 census there were 92 people recorded with the Hammersly surname, ranking it #20,709 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 7, ranked #37,967, down from #20,709 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St George in the East, Leek and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hammersly is 133 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 92.4%.

1881 census count

92

Ranked #20,709

Modern count

7

2016, ranked #37,967

Peak year

1851

133 bearers

Map years

1

1851 to 1851

Key insights

  • Hammersly had 92 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,709 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 7 in 2016, ranked #37,967.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 133 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Hammersly surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hammersly surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hammersly surname density by area, 1851 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hammersly over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 133 #14,106
1861 historical 11 #32,452
1881 historical 92 #20,709
1891 historical 9 #33,451
1901 historical 49 #28,696
1911 historical 33 #29,703
1997 modern 5 #37,891
1998 modern 5 #37,861
1999 modern 6 #37,696
2000 modern 3 #38,248
2001 modern 2 #38,335
2002 modern 2 #38,400
2003 modern 2 #38,424
2004 modern 2 #38,464
2005 modern 2 #38,532
2006 modern 2 #38,590
2007 modern 3 #38,372
2008 modern 2 #38,673
2009 modern 3 #38,494
2010 modern 5 #38,186
2011 modern 5 #38,168
2012 modern 7 #37,854
2013 modern 7 #37,909
2014 modern 6 #38,077
2015 modern 7 #37,920
2016 modern 7 #37,967

Geography

Back to top

Where Hammerslys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St George in the East, Leek, London parishes, St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford and Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St George in the East London (East Districts)
2 Leek Staffordshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford London (South Districts)
5 Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars Leicestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hammersly

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hammersly surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hammersly

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hammersly, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Hammersly surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Hammersly household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Hammersly is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hammersly is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Unknown

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hammersly, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hammersly families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hammersly surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Staffordshire leads with 30 Hammerslys recorded in 1881 and an index of 9.90x.

County Total Index
Staffordshire 30 9.90x
Kent 20 6.53x
Cheshire 9 4.54x
Lancashire 7 0.66x
Leicestershire 7 7.04x
Warwickshire 5 2.21x
Durham 3 1.12x
Middlesex 3 0.33x
Derbyshire 2 1.42x
Oxfordshire 2 3.61x
Essex 1 0.56x
Lanarkshire 1 0.34x
Northamptonshire 1 1.18x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.83x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stoke Upon Trent in Staffordshire leads with 15 Hammerslys recorded in 1881 and an index of 46.70x.

Place Total Index
Stoke Upon Trent 15 46.70x
Deptford St Paul 11 46.57x
Woolwich 9 79.58x
Leek Lowe 8 198.51x
Leicester St Margaret 7 28.84x
Nantwich 5 217.39x
Nuneaton 5 190.84x
Salford 5 15.96x
Seighford 4 1666.67x
Stockton On Tees 3 23.31x
Alsager 2 408.16x
Derby St Alkmund 2 47.51x
Finchley 2 58.14x
Manchester 2 4.18x
Rotherfield Greys 2 338.98x
Stafford St Mary 2 46.62x
Arclid 1 1000.00x
Barony 1 1.36x
Hornsey 1 8.81x
Macclesfield 1 11.35x
Moulton 1 212.77x
Nottingham St Mary 1 3.20x
Wednesfield 1 22.42x
West Ham 1 2.56x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hammersly surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Ann 5
Kate 4
Mary 4
Sarah 4
Elizabeth 3
Ellen 3
Emily 3
Annie 2
Edith 2
Rosa 2
Amy 1
Esther 1
Fanny 1
Harriet 1
Harriett 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Laura 1
Mabel 1
Margaret 1
Matilda 1
Nelly 1
Phoenellia 1
Rachel 1
Ruth 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hammersly surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 4
Isaac 3
James 3
Robert 3
Thomas 3
William 3
Daniel 2
Ephraim 2
George 2
Ralph 2
Wm. 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Edward 1
Frederick 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Jarvis 1
Jeremiah 1
Joseph 1
Ralf 1
Richard 1
Walter 1
Wm.R. 1

FAQ

Hammersly surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hammersly surname in 1881?

In 1881, 92 people were recorded with the Hammersly surname. That placed it at #20,709 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hammersly surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 7 in 2016. That gives Hammersly a modern rank of #37,967.

What does the Hammersly map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hammersly bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.