NameCensus.

UK surname

Haskings

In the 1881 census there were 94 people recorded with the Haskings surname, ranking it #20,467 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 29, ranked #36,059, down from #20,467 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Rackenford, Abson with Wick and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Haskings is 137 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 69.1%.

1881 census count

94

Ranked #20,467

Modern count

29

2016, ranked #36,059

Peak year

1891

137 bearers

Map years

4

1861 to 1911

Key insights

  • Haskings had 94 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,467 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 29 in 2016, ranked #36,059.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 137 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Haskings surname distribution map

The map shows where the Haskings surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Haskings surname density by area, 1911 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Haskings over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 96 #17,594
1861 historical 130 #17,164
1881 historical 94 #20,467
1891 historical 137 #19,501
1901 historical 101 #22,726
1911 historical 103 #22,328
1997 modern 38 #33,872
1998 modern 37 #34,149
1999 modern 39 #34,058
2000 modern 37 #34,217
2001 modern 38 #34,004
2002 modern 40 #34,133
2003 modern 44 #33,875
2004 modern 45 #33,957
2005 modern 46 #34,081
2006 modern 45 #34,491
2007 modern 46 #34,634
2008 modern 43 #34,931
2009 modern 42 #35,148
2010 modern 40 #35,403
2011 modern 38 #35,501
2012 modern 36 #35,595
2013 modern 31 #35,927
2014 modern 32 #35,896
2015 modern 32 #35,876
2016 modern 29 #36,059

Geography

Back to top

Where Haskings' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Rackenford, Abson with Wick, London parishes, Lambeth and St Marylebone. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Rackenford Devon
2 Abson with Wick Gloucestershire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Lambeth London (South Districts)
5 St Marylebone London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Haskings

These lists show first names that appear often with the Haskings surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Haskings

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Haskings, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Haskings surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Haskings household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Haskings is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Haskings is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Haskings, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Haskings families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Haskings surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Devon leads with 29 Haskings' recorded in 1881 and an index of 15.20x.

County Total Index
Devon 29 15.20x
Middlesex 17 1.85x
Gloucestershire 16 8.90x
Somerset 7 4.74x
Monmouthshire 6 9.05x
Hampshire 4 2.13x
Surrey 4 0.90x
Herefordshire 3 7.98x
Wiltshire 2 2.47x
Essex 1 0.55x
Glamorgan 1 0.63x
Kent 1 0.32x
Midlothian 1 0.81x
Warwickshire 1 0.43x
Yorkshire 1 0.11x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bitton Oldland in Gloucestershire leads with 11 Haskings' recorded in 1881 and an index of 597.83x.

Place Total Index
Bitton Oldland 11 597.83x
Exeter St Mary Major 6 521.74x
Rackenford 6 5454.55x
St Pancras London 6 8.13x
Tiverton 6 182.37x
Upper Machen 6 1333.33x
Weston Super Mare 6 160.86x
Isleworth 5 122.55x
South Molton 5 476.19x
Lambeth 4 5.00x
Ventnor 4 223.46x
Willesden 4 46.30x
Weston Beggard 3 3333.33x
Wick Abson 3 1071.43x
Bristol St George 2 24.04x
Kensington London 2 3.92x
Kenton 2 333.33x
Zeal Monachorum 2 1333.33x
Aston 1 1.57x
Box 1 144.93x
Congresbury 1 270.27x
Coyty Lower 1 96.15x
Folkestone 1 16.47x
Halberton 1 227.27x
Huddersfield 1 7.56x
Melksham 1 70.92x
North Leith 1 17.61x
Walthamstow 1 15.36x
Washfield 1 833.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Haskings surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 5
Elizabeth 4
Susan 3
Ada 2
Agnes 2
Alice 2
Ann 2
Frances 2
Jane 2
Sarah 2
Amelia 1
Annie 1
Beatrice 1
Bessie 1
Charlotte 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Else 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Eva 1
Florence 1
Jennie 1
M.E. 1
Maria 1
Susana 1
Tryphena 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Haskings surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
John 5
Ernest 3
George 3
Samuel 3
Walter 3
Henry 2
Robert 2
Thomas 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Benjamin 1
Daniel 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Isaac 1
Joseph 1
Richard 1
Sidney 1
W.Luce 1
Wm.C. 1

FAQ

Haskings surname: questions and answers

How common was the Haskings surname in 1881?

In 1881, 94 people were recorded with the Haskings surname. That placed it at #20,467 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Haskings surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 29 in 2016. That gives Haskings a modern rank of #36,059.

What does the Haskings map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Haskings bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.