NameCensus.

UK surname

Hayling

In the 1881 census there were 79 people recorded with the Hayling surname, ranking it #22,357 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 52, ranked #34,780, down from #22,357 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Churcham, Sandhurst, St Mary-de-Lode, St Catherine Longford, Barnwood, Wootton Ville, North Hamlet,, London parishes and Newent. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hayling is 104 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 34.2%.

1881 census count

79

Ranked #22,357

Modern count

52

2016, ranked #34,780

Peak year

1891

104 bearers

Map years

1

1891 to 1891

Key insights

  • Hayling had 79 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #22,357 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 52 in 2016, ranked #34,780.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 104 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Hayling surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hayling surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hayling surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hayling over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 38 #26,502
1861 historical 69 #25,057
1881 historical 79 #22,357
1891 historical 104 #23,388
1901 historical 89 #24,154
1911 historical 65 #26,343
1997 modern 54 #32,210
1998 modern 63 #31,639
1999 modern 66 #31,509
2000 modern 65 #31,641
2001 modern 63 #31,693
2002 modern 64 #32,007
2003 modern 69 #31,587
2004 modern 78 #30,919
2005 modern 72 #31,730
2006 modern 62 #33,043
2007 modern 63 #33,243
2008 modern 59 #33,827
2009 modern 55 #34,355
2010 modern 56 #34,480
2011 modern 49 #34,868
2012 modern 49 #34,873
2013 modern 51 #34,834
2014 modern 53 #34,753
2015 modern 52 #34,775
2016 modern 52 #34,780

Geography

Back to top

Where Haylings are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Churcham, Sandhurst, St Mary-de-Lode, St Catherine Longford, Barnwood, Wootton Ville, North Hamlet,, London parishes, Newent, Batheaston and Cheltenham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Churcham, Sandhurst, St Mary-de-Lode, St Catherine Longford, Barnwood, Wootton Ville, North Hamlet, Gloucestershire
2 London parishes London 3
3 Newent Gloucestershire
4 Batheaston Somerset
5 Cheltenham Gloucestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hayling

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hayling surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hayling

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hayling, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Hayling surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Hayling household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Hayling is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hayling is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hayling, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hayling families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hayling surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Gloucestershire leads with 16 Haylings recorded in 1881 and an index of 10.59x.

County Total Index
Gloucestershire 16 10.59x
Middlesex 15 1.95x
Worcestershire 14 13.92x
Berkshire 5 8.65x
Herefordshire 5 15.83x
Surrey 5 1.33x
Warwickshire 5 2.57x
Sussex 4 3.08x
Kent 3 1.14x
Devon 2 1.25x
Hampshire 2 1.27x
Shropshire 1 1.50x
Staffordshire 1 0.38x
Suffolk 1 1.07x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bromsgrove in Worcestershire leads with 9 Haylings recorded in 1881 and an index of 265.49x.

Place Total Index
Bromsgrove 9 265.49x
Cheltenham 9 77.19x
Hammersmith London 8 42.15x
Birmingham 5 7.72x
Old Windsor 5 746.27x
Camberwell 4 8.13x
Gloucester St John Baptist 4 408.16x
Hanley Castle 3 500.00x
St Martin In Fields 3 65.08x
Westbourne 3 461.54x
Deptford St Paul 2 9.87x
Hereford St Peter 2 238.10x
Islington London 2 2.68x
Kingstone 2 1666.67x
Newent 2 259.74x
Plymouth St Andrew 2 16.19x
Aldershot 1 18.90x
Alverstoke 1 17.48x
Avenbury 1 909.09x
Bury 1 714.29x
Charlton Kings 1 95.24x
Southwark St George Martyr 1 6.45x
Southwold 1 178.57x
St George Hanover Square 1 7.37x
St Marylebone London 1 2.43x
Tonbridge 1 10.55x
Whitchurch 1 77.52x
Wolverhampton 1 5.00x
Worcester All Sts 1 172.41x
Worcester College 1 3333.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hayling surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 4
Eliza 3
Emma 3
Harriet 3
Agnes 2
Alice 2
Ann 2
Annie 2
Emily 2
Fanny 2
Sarah 2
Ada 1
Clara 1
Elizabeth 1
Esther 1
Florence 1
Francis 1
Gertrude 1
Jane 1
Jessie 1
Kate 1
Margaret 1
Martha 1
Maryanne 1
Minnie 1
Philadelphia 1
Rose 1
Susan 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hayling surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Hayling surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hayling surname in 1881?

In 1881, 79 people were recorded with the Hayling surname. That placed it at #22,357 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hayling surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 52 in 2016. That gives Hayling a modern rank of #34,780.

What does the Hayling map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hayling bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.