NameCensus.

UK surname

Holdom

In the 1881 census there were 157 people recorded with the Holdom surname, ranking it #15,046 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 172, ranked #21,648, down from #15,046 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Wolverhampton, Rugby and Polesworth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Aylesbury Vale, Breckland and Leicester.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Holdom is 240 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 9.6%.

1881 census count

157

Ranked #15,046

Modern count

172

2016, ranked #21,648

Peak year

1911

240 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Holdom had 157 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,046 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 172 in 2016, ranked #21,648.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 240 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Holdom surname distribution map

The map shows where the Holdom surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Holdom surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Holdom over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 83 #19,181
1861 historical 87 #22,681
1881 historical 157 #15,046
1891 historical 184 #15,869
1901 historical 217 #14,381
1911 historical 240 #13,281
1997 modern 194 #17,978
1998 modern 203 #17,949
1999 modern 208 #17,808
2000 modern 185 #19,118
2001 modern 183 #18,980
2002 modern 184 #19,275
2003 modern 177 #19,549
2004 modern 181 #19,363
2005 modern 180 #19,395
2006 modern 168 #20,368
2007 modern 162 #21,115
2008 modern 157 #21,766
2009 modern 160 #21,978
2010 modern 160 #22,487
2011 modern 164 #21,900
2012 modern 164 #21,883
2013 modern 171 #21,654
2014 modern 172 #21,731
2015 modern 171 #21,729
2016 modern 172 #21,648

Geography

Back to top

Where Holdoms are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wolverhampton, Rugby, Polesworth, London parishes and Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Aylesbury Vale, Breckland, Leicester, Bromsgrove and Waltham Forest. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wolverhampton Staffordshire
2 Rugby Warwickshire
3 Polesworth Warwickshire
4 London parishes London 3
5 Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars Leicestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Aylesbury Vale 006 Aylesbury Vale
2 Breckland 011 Breckland
3 Leicester 036 Leicester
4 Bromsgrove 010 Bromsgrove
5 Waltham Forest 002 Waltham Forest

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Holdom

These lists show first names that appear often with the Holdom surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Holdom

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Holdom, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Holdom surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Holdom household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Holdom is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Holdom is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Holdom falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Holdom is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Holdom, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Holdom families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Holdom surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 39 Holdoms recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.55x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 39 2.55x
Buckinghamshire 27 29.16x
Warwickshire 21 5.44x
Staffordshire 16 3.10x
Kent 14 2.68x
Hampshire 9 2.87x
Bedfordshire 7 8.83x
Worcestershire 6 3.00x
Northamptonshire 5 3.47x
Essex 3 0.99x
Lancashire 3 0.17x
Surrey 3 0.40x
Monmouthshire 1 0.90x
Suffolk 1 0.54x
Sussex 1 0.39x
Yorkshire 1 0.07x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Polesworth in Warwickshire leads with 21 Holdoms recorded in 1881 and an index of 1147.54x.

Place Total Index
Polesworth 21 1147.54x
Fenny Stratford 15 1704.55x
Bethnal Green London 10 15.03x
Wolverhampton 10 25.16x
Shoreditch London 9 13.56x
Drayton Parslow 8 3200.00x
Mile End Old Town London 8 24.55x
Aldershot 7 66.60x
Tettenhall 6 189.87x
Whittington 6 3000.00x
Bow London 5 25.64x
Deptford St Paul 5 12.41x
Folkestone 5 49.36x
Caddington 4 344.83x
Chorlton On Medlock 3 10.39x
Luton 3 21.85x
St George Hanover Square 3 11.12x
Thornborough 3 1000.00x
West Ham 3 4.50x
Byfield 2 476.19x
Cosgrove 2 606.06x
Ightham 2 303.03x
Lambeth 2 1.50x
Portsea 2 3.25x
Blaxhall 1 370.37x
Camberwell 1 1.02x
Chislehurst 1 35.71x
Finchley 1 17.04x
Hackney London 1 1.16x
Hastings Holy Trinity 1 52.63x
Islington London 1 0.67x
Kings Sutton 1 156.25x
Newton Longville 1 400.00x
Ramsgate 1 11.72x
Spitalfields London 1 8.68x
St Woollos 1 8.10x
Stokesley 1 105.26x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Holdom surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 12
Eliza 8
Elizabeth 6
Sarah 6
Alice 4
Emily 4
Annie 3
Ann 2
Florence 2
Hannah 2
Rebecca 2
Rose 2
Agnes 1
Amy 1
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Constance 1
E. 1
Edith 1
Elisa 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Emma 1
Georgina 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Julia 1
Louisa 1
Lydia 1
Margaret 1
Martha 1
Maud 1
Phoeba 1
Rosie 1
S. 1
Selina 1
Susan 1
Winifred 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Holdom surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 12
William 10
John 8
Joseph 7
Thomas 5
Henry 4
James 3
Alfred 2
Arthur 2
Harry 2
Walter 2
Charles 1
Chas. 1
Daniel 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Ephraiam 1
Ernest 1
Frederick 1
Geo. 1
Geo.Henry 1
H.D. 1
Horace 1
J. 1
Jas.D. 1
Joshua 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1
Sydney 1
Thos. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Holdom surname: questions and answers

How common was the Holdom surname in 1881?

In 1881, 157 people were recorded with the Holdom surname. That placed it at #15,046 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Holdom surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 172 in 2016. That gives Holdom a modern rank of #21,648.

What does the Holdom map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Holdom bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.