NameCensus.

UK surname

Horrox

In the 1881 census there were 232 people recorded with the Horrox surname, ranking it #11,677 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 147, ranked #24,071, down from #11,677 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bury, Leeds and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Pembrokeshire, Rochdale and Harrogate.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Horrox is 380 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 36.6%.

1881 census count

232

Ranked #11,677

Modern count

147

2016, ranked #24,071

Peak year

1851

380 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Horrox had 232 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,677 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 147 in 2016, ranked #24,071.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 380 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Horrox surname distribution map

The map shows where the Horrox surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Horrox surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Horrox over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 380 #6,284
1861 historical 237 #10,359
1881 historical 232 #11,677
1891 historical 188 #15,609
1901 historical 218 #14,332
1911 historical 192 #15,342
1997 modern 143 #21,761
1998 modern 151 #21,578
1999 modern 135 #23,279
2000 modern 142 #22,544
2001 modern 134 #23,037
2002 modern 134 #23,492
2003 modern 133 #23,359
2004 modern 131 #23,756
2005 modern 132 #23,623
2006 modern 123 #24,873
2007 modern 126 #24,860
2008 modern 139 #23,635
2009 modern 141 #23,907
2010 modern 143 #24,247
2011 modern 146 #23,736
2012 modern 142 #24,148
2013 modern 144 #24,323
2014 modern 143 #24,621
2015 modern 143 #24,481
2016 modern 147 #24,071

Geography

Back to top

Where Horrox' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bury, Leeds, Manchester, Middleton and Bury (Walmersley and Tottington, Heap),Middleton (Birtle with Bamford, Pilsworth). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Pembrokeshire, Rochdale, Harrogate, Bracknell Forest and Sunderland. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bury Lancashire
2 Leeds Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 Middleton Lancashire
5 Bury (Walmersley and Tottington, Heap),Middleton (Birtle with Bamford, Pilsworth) Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Pembrokeshire 002 Pembrokeshire
2 Rochdale 018 Rochdale
3 Harrogate 006 Harrogate
4 Bracknell Forest 014 Bracknell Forest
5 Sunderland 021 Sunderland

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Horrox

These lists show first names that appear often with the Horrox surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Horrox

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Horrox, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Horrox surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Horrox household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Horrox is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Horrox is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Horrox falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Horrox is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Horrox, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Horrox families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Horrox surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 167 Horrox' recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.27x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 167 6.27x
Yorkshire 30 1.35x
Derbyshire 16 4.56x
Middlesex 7 0.31x
Suffolk 6 2.20x
Norfolk 3 0.87x
Cheshire 1 0.20x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Heap in Lancashire leads with 47 Horrox' recorded in 1881 and an index of 332.86x.

Place Total Index
Heap 47 332.86x
Leeds 28 22.30x
Hopwood 16 459.77x
Middleton In Oldham 16 200.50x
Blackley 14 299.79x
Bury 12 39.46x
Glossop Dale 11 66.87x
Radcliffe 9 70.15x
Manchester 6 5.01x
Oswaldtwistle 6 63.76x
Broughton In Salford 5 20.54x
Elton 5 54.35x
Long Melford 5 196.85x
Paddington London 5 6.06x
Pilkington 5 49.46x
Tottington Lower End 5 39.53x
Castleton 4 15.04x
Chapel En Le Frith 4 124.61x
Chorlton On Medlock 4 9.46x
Crumpsall 4 63.80x
Pilsworth 4 677.97x
Methwold 3 267.86x
Tonge 3 53.67x
St Pancras London 2 1.11x
Thornton In Bradford 2 27.03x
Birkenhead 1 2.53x
Buxton 1 33.67x
Goldshaw Booth 1 370.37x
Harpurhey 1 27.10x
Stowmarket 1 31.65x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Horrox surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 14
Sarah 12
Alice 10
Ann 5
Jane 5
Elizabeth 4
Hannah 4
Martha 4
Ada 3
Amelia 3
Emily 3
Emma 3
Anna 2
Annie 2
Catherine 2
Clarissa 2
Eliza 2
Ethel 2
Fanny 2
Harriet 2
Louisa 2
Lucy 2
Margaret 2
Maria 2
Nancy 2
Betty 1
Clara 1
Dorothy 1
Eleanor 1
Elizth.Ann 1
Ellen 1
Esther 1
Fanney 1
Harriett 1
Helen 1
Helena 1
Kate 1
Keziah 1
Leah 1
Mabel 1
Meria 1
Nellie 1
Phillis 1
Phoebe 1
Rachel 1
Susan 1
Unice 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Horrox surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 12
James 10
Joseph 10
John 8
Thomas 7
Samuel 5
Charles 4
George 4
Harry 4
Henry 4
Robert 4
Edward 3
Richard 3
Saml. 3
Alfred 2
Frank 2
Peter 2
Theophilus 2
Wm. 2
Abraham 1
Adam 1
Albert 1
Alpheus 1
Anthony 1
Arthur 1
Augustus 1
Benjamin 1
Claude 1
Ernest 1
Fred 1
Handel 1
Isaac 1
Jas. 1
Jessie 1
Percy 1
Smith 1
Squire 1
Thos. 1
Tom 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Horrox surname: questions and answers

How common was the Horrox surname in 1881?

In 1881, 232 people were recorded with the Horrox surname. That placed it at #11,677 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Horrox surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 147 in 2016. That gives Horrox a modern rank of #24,071.

What does the Horrox map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Horrox bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.