NameCensus.

UK surname

Hunnable

In the 1881 census there were 38 people recorded with the Hunnable surname, ranking it #28,285 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 113, ranked #28,691, down from #28,285 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Uttlesford, Colchester and Waltham Forest.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hunnable is 122 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 197.4%.

1881 census count

38

Ranked #28,285

Modern count

113

2016, ranked #28,691

Peak year

1999

122 bearers

Map years

3

1998 to 2016

Key insights

  • Hunnable had 38 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #28,285 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 113 in 2016, ranked #28,691.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 85 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Suburban Professionals.

Hunnable surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hunnable surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hunnable surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hunnable over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 14 #30,790
1861 historical 52 #27,369
1881 historical 38 #28,285
1891 historical 60 #29,204
1901 historical 66 #26,794
1911 historical 85 #24,322
1997 modern 121 #24,019
1998 modern 121 #24,677
1999 modern 122 #24,745
2000 modern 120 #24,950
2001 modern 116 #25,089
2002 modern 120 #25,110
2003 modern 111 #26,091
2004 modern 116 #25,580
2005 modern 110 #26,430
2006 modern 109 #26,872
2007 modern 108 #27,391
2008 modern 112 #27,061
2009 modern 115 #27,207
2010 modern 116 #27,704
2011 modern 115 #27,634
2012 modern 106 #29,187
2013 modern 107 #29,561
2014 modern 107 #29,827
2015 modern 107 #29,708
2016 modern 113 #28,691

Geography

Back to top

Where Hunnables are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Uttlesford, Colchester, Waltham Forest and Braintree. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Uttlesford 003 Uttlesford
2 Colchester 011 Colchester
3 Waltham Forest 004 Waltham Forest
4 Braintree 002 Braintree
5 Braintree 013 Braintree

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hunnable

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hunnable surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hunnable

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hunnable, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals

Group

Suburban Professionals

Nationally, the Hunnable surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Suburban Professionals, within Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals. This does not mean every Hunnable household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Employment in this Group is typically in managerial and professional occupations, and education to degree level is common. Residents are typically of working age, many of whom identify with an Indian ethnicity. Households are unlikely to be of Mixed or Multiple ethnicities, and English is not the main language used in some households. This Group is found on the outskirts of most conurbations as well as in the suburbs of some free-standing towns.

Wider pattern

Those working within the managerial, professional and administrative occupations typically reflect a wide range of ethnic groups, and reside in detached or semi-detached housing. Their residential locations at the edges of cities and conurbations and car-based lifestyles are more characteristic of Supergroup membership than birthplace or participation in child-rearing. Houses are typically owner-occupied and marriage rates are lower than the national average. This Supergroup is found throughout suburban UK.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Hunnable is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Hunnable is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Hunnable falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hunnable is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hunnable, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hunnable families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hunnable surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Essex leads with 25 Hunnables recorded in 1881 and an index of 34.19x.

County Total Index
Essex 25 34.19x
Middlesex 13 3.51x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Braintree in Essex leads with 16 Hunnables recorded in 1881 and an index of 2424.24x.

Place Total Index
Braintree 16 2424.24x
Lawford 9 8181.82x
Bethnal Green London 7 43.51x
Hackney London 6 28.89x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hunnable surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hunnable surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Hunnable surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hunnable surname in 1881?

In 1881, 38 people were recorded with the Hunnable surname. That placed it at #28,285 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hunnable surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 113 in 2016. That gives Hunnable a modern rank of #28,691.

What does the Hunnable map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hunnable bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.