NameCensus.

UK surname

Huzzey

In the 1881 census there were 171 people recorded with the Huzzey surname, ranking it #14,212 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 162, ranked #22,512, down from #14,212 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St Mary, Monmouth and East Dean, Little Dean, Flaxley, Abinghall, Weston-under-Penyard (Ross, Herefordshire), Lea (Ross, H. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include East Dorset, West Berkshire and Epping Forest.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Huzzey is 208 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 5.3%.

1881 census count

171

Ranked #14,212

Modern count

162

2016, ranked #22,512

Peak year

1999

208 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Huzzey had 171 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,212 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 162 in 2016, ranked #22,512.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 174 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Huzzey surname distribution map

The map shows where the Huzzey surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Huzzey surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Huzzey over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 108 #16,308
1861 historical 88 #22,554
1881 historical 171 #14,212
1891 historical 158 #17,705
1901 historical 144 #18,505
1911 historical 174 #16,311
1997 modern 187 #18,398
1998 modern 201 #18,047
1999 modern 208 #17,808
2000 modern 208 #17,772
2001 modern 196 #18,146
2002 modern 186 #19,150
2003 modern 166 #20,320
2004 modern 168 #20,300
2005 modern 166 #20,379
2006 modern 155 #21,477
2007 modern 151 #22,120
2008 modern 158 #21,690
2009 modern 162 #21,791
2010 modern 165 #22,026
2011 modern 155 #22,790
2012 modern 152 #23,069
2013 modern 165 #22,163
2014 modern 162 #22,624
2015 modern 172 #21,649
2016 modern 162 #22,512

Geography

Back to top

Where Huzzeys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St Mary, Monmouth, East Dean, Little Dean, Flaxley, Abinghall, Weston-under-Penyard (Ross, Herefordshire), Lea (Ross, H, Ilsley, West and Kidderminster. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to East Dorset, West Berkshire, Epping Forest, Havering and Croydon. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St Mary Pembrokeshire
2 Monmouth Monmouthshire
3 East Dean, Little Dean, Flaxley, Abinghall, Weston-under-Penyard (Ross, Herefordshire), Lea (Ross, H Gloucestershire
4 Ilsley, West Berkshire
5 Kidderminster Worcestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 East Dorset 001 East Dorset
2 West Berkshire 002 West Berkshire
3 Epping Forest 014 Epping Forest
4 Havering 010 Havering
5 Croydon 033 Croydon

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Huzzey

These lists show first names that appear often with the Huzzey surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Huzzey

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Huzzey, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Huzzey surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Huzzey household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Huzzey is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Huzzey is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Huzzey falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Huzzey is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Huzzey, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Huzzey families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Huzzey surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Monmouthshire leads with 30 Huzzeys recorded in 1881 and an index of 24.73x.

County Total Index
Monmouthshire 30 24.73x
Pembrokeshire 29 54.39x
Glamorgan 26 8.90x
Berkshire 25 19.85x
Gloucestershire 14 4.25x
Kent 7 1.22x
Worcestershire 7 3.19x
Carmarthenshire 6 8.49x
Middlesex 6 0.36x
Buckinghamshire 5 4.93x
Essex 4 1.21x
Lancashire 4 0.20x
Surrey 4 0.49x
Herefordshire 3 4.36x
Royal Navy 1 5.00x
Wiltshire 1 0.67x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Monmouth in Monmouthshire leads with 20 Huzzeys recorded in 1881 and an index of 621.12x.

Place Total Index
Monmouth 20 621.12x
Pembroke St Mary 15 218.34x
Fawley 14 10769.23x
Swansea Higher 12 394.74x
Westbury On Severn East 11 147.85x
Burton 9 1666.67x
Kidderminster Borough 7 54.60x
Llangennech 6 530.97x
St Pancras London 6 4.44x
Whitchurch 6 379.75x
Cardiff St Mary 5 31.08x
Fawley 5 2941.18x
Trevethin 5 43.67x
Bermondsey 4 8.01x
Layton With Warbreck 4 54.72x
Wantage 4 199.01x
West Ham 4 5.47x
Chaddleworth 3 1250.00x
Chatham 3 19.05x
Coedfrank 3 148.51x
Gillingham 3 25.42x
Newport 3 51.81x
Walford 3 441.18x
Angle 2 769.23x
Hubberston 2 256.41x
West Dean 2 37.38x
West Ilsley 2 909.09x
Abingdon St Nicholas 1 285.71x
Beckenham 1 13.37x
Cholsey 1 100.00x
English Bicknor 1 277.78x
Great Bedwin 1 95.24x
Royal Navy 1 5.85x
St Woollos 1 7.39x
Steynton 1 58.14x
Upper Llanvrechva 1 53.19x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Huzzey surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 12
Sarah 8
Edith 4
Elizabeth 4
Margaret 4
Emily 3
Ethel 3
Ada 2
Alice 2
Eliza 2
Ellen 2
Hannah 2
Laura 2
Maria 2
Martha 2
Ann 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Beatrice 1
Clara 1
Dora 1
Dorcas 1
Elizth 1
Emma 1
Esther 1
Eva 1
Eveling 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Gertrude 1
Helen 1
Jane 1
Katey 1
Lavinia 1
Lilian 1
Lily 1
Lizzey 1
Lizzie 1
Louisa 1
Mabel 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Huzzey surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Huzzey surname: questions and answers

How common was the Huzzey surname in 1881?

In 1881, 171 people were recorded with the Huzzey surname. That placed it at #14,212 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Huzzey surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 162 in 2016. That gives Huzzey a modern rank of #22,512.

What does the Huzzey map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Huzzey bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.