NameCensus.

UK surname

Imms

In the 1881 census there were 116 people recorded with the Imms surname, ranking it #18,126 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 315, ranked #14,258, up from #18,126 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Ringmer, London parishes and Colwich (Colwich), Stowe, Colton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include County Durham, Gravesham and Newark and Sherwood.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Imms is 336 in 2013. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 171.6%.

1881 census count

116

Ranked #18,126

Modern count

315

2016, ranked #14,258

Peak year

2013

336 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Imms had 116 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,126 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 315 in 2016, ranked #14,258.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 209 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Imms surname distribution map

The map shows where the Imms surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Imms surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Imms over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 89 #18,446
1861 historical 57 #26,718
1881 historical 116 #18,126
1891 historical 161 #17,473
1901 historical 191 #15,579
1911 historical 209 #14,557
1997 modern 299 #13,563
1998 modern 313 #13,504
1999 modern 321 #13,362
2000 modern 310 #13,618
2001 modern 303 #13,645
2002 modern 305 #13,865
2003 modern 291 #14,100
2004 modern 295 #14,025
2005 modern 284 #14,306
2006 modern 297 #14,004
2007 modern 311 #13,703
2008 modern 308 #13,882
2009 modern 316 #13,933
2010 modern 318 #14,136
2011 modern 329 #13,694
2012 modern 332 #13,501
2013 modern 336 #13,574
2014 modern 329 #13,918
2015 modern 325 #13,927
2016 modern 315 #14,258

Geography

Back to top

Where Imms' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Ringmer, London parishes, Colwich (Colwich), Stowe, Colton, Brighton and Chiselhurst, Foots Cray. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to County Durham, Gravesham, Newark and Sherwood, Tandridge and Torfaen. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Ringmer Sussex
2 London parishes London 3
3 Colwich (Colwich), Stowe, Colton Staffordshire
4 Brighton Sussex
5 Chiselhurst, Foots Cray Kent

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 County Durham 035 County Durham
2 Gravesham 002 Gravesham
3 Newark and Sherwood 006 Newark and Sherwood
4 Tandridge 008 Tandridge
5 Torfaen 003 Torfaen

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Imms

These lists show first names that appear often with the Imms surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Imms

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Imms, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Imms surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Imms household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Imms is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Imms is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Imms falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Imms is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Imms, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Imms families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Imms surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 18 Imms' recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.62x.

County Total Index
Kent 18 4.62x
Surrey 13 2.34x
Sussex 12 6.24x
Warwickshire 12 4.17x
Middlesex 11 0.96x
Staffordshire 10 2.60x
Berkshire 9 10.51x
Herefordshire 9 19.23x
Northamptonshire 5 4.66x
Yorkshire 5 0.44x
Oxfordshire 4 5.68x
Worcestershire 4 2.68x
Gloucestershire 3 1.34x
Glamorgan 1 0.50x
Monmouthshire 1 1.21x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Ringmer in Sussex leads with 10 Imms' recorded in 1881 and an index of 1851.85x.

Place Total Index
Ringmer 10 1851.85x
Colwich 7 760.87x
Birmingham 6 6.26x
Sandhurst 6 361.45x
Bermondsey 5 14.72x
Chislehurst 5 239.23x
Edgbaston 5 56.05x
Northampton Priory St 5 77.64x
Snodland 5 454.55x
South Elmshall 5 2380.95x
Filkins 4 1739.13x
Islington London 4 3.62x
Kings Norton 4 29.94x
Newington 4 9.49x
St Pauls Cray 4 1333.33x
Bishops Frome 3 1071.43x
Horton Kirby 3 500.00x
Kensington London 3 4.73x
Merrow 3 1304.35x
Newent 3 263.16x
Armitage 2 400.00x
Hereford St Martin 2 350.88x
Holme Lacy 2 1666.67x
Mile End Old Town London 2 8.23x
Uffington 2 909.09x
Yarpole 2 833.33x
Aston 1 1.26x
Brighton 1 2.58x
Great Faringdon 1 81.30x
Lambeth 1 1.01x
Orpington 1 84.03x
Penarth 1 51.55x
Preston 1 29.76x
Sedgley 1 6.99x
St Marylebone London 1 1.64x
St Pancras London 1 1.09x
Usk 1 147.06x

FAQ

Imms surname: questions and answers

How common was the Imms surname in 1881?

In 1881, 116 people were recorded with the Imms surname. That placed it at #18,126 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Imms surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 315 in 2016. That gives Imms a modern rank of #14,258.

What does the Imms map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Imms bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.