NameCensus.

UK surname

Jurd

In the 1881 census there were 186 people recorded with the Jurd surname, ranking it #13,448 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 203, ranked #19,396, down from #13,448 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to South Stoneham, Alverstoke, Gosport, Rowner and Southampton St Mary. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Gosport, Southampton and Eastleigh.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Jurd is 217 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 9.1%.

1881 census count

186

Ranked #13,448

Modern count

203

2016, ranked #19,396

Peak year

1901

217 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Jurd had 186 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,448 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 203 in 2016, ranked #19,396.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 217 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Jurd surname distribution map

The map shows where the Jurd surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Jurd surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Jurd over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 99 #17,294
1861 historical 70 #24,911
1881 historical 186 #13,448
1891 historical 207 #14,546
1901 historical 217 #14,381
1911 historical 211 #14,467
1997 modern 211 #17,048
1998 modern 210 #17,600
1999 modern 215 #17,425
2000 modern 210 #17,670
2001 modern 207 #17,573
2002 modern 210 #17,753
2003 modern 204 #17,909
2004 modern 202 #18,110
2005 modern 200 #18,144
2006 modern 195 #18,564
2007 modern 210 #17,904
2008 modern 207 #18,243
2009 modern 201 #18,965
2010 modern 201 #19,387
2011 modern 205 #18,965
2012 modern 207 #18,777
2013 modern 206 #19,153
2014 modern 209 #19,128
2015 modern 210 #18,958
2016 modern 203 #19,396

Geography

Back to top

Where Jurds are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around South Stoneham, Alverstoke, Gosport, Rowner, Southampton St Mary, Portsmouth, Portsea and Hound. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Gosport, Southampton and Eastleigh. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 South Stoneham Hampshire
2 Alverstoke, Gosport, Rowner Hampshire
3 Southampton St Mary Hampshire
4 Portsmouth, Portsea Hampshire
5 Hound Hampshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Gosport 010 Gosport
2 Southampton 017 Southampton
3 Eastleigh 006 Eastleigh
4 Eastleigh 008 Eastleigh
5 Eastleigh 011 Eastleigh

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Jurd

These lists show first names that appear often with the Jurd surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Jurd

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Jurd, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Jurd surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Jurd household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Jurd is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Jurd is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Jurd falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Jurd is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Jurd, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Jurd families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Jurd surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Hampshire leads with 161 Jurds recorded in 1881 and an index of 43.30x.

County Total Index
Hampshire 161 43.30x
Surrey 9 1.02x
Devon 7 1.85x
Middlesex 4 0.22x
Kent 2 0.32x
Sussex 2 0.65x
Berkshire 1 0.73x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. St Mary Extra in Hampshire leads with 49 Jurds recorded in 1881 and an index of 1638.80x.

Place Total Index
St Mary Extra 49 1638.80x
South Stoneham 20 247.83x
Hound 19 753.97x
Alverstoke 13 96.58x
Botley 12 1791.04x
Millbrook 11 117.40x
Southhampton St Mary Extra 8 2000.00x
Wandsworth 8 45.82x
Dartmouth Townstall 7 454.55x
Portsea 7 9.60x
Hamble Le Rice 5 1923.08x
Southampton St Mary 5 21.39x
Southampton 4 1379.31x
Southampton All Sts 3 47.02x
Bursledon 2 500.00x
Fareham 2 44.74x
St George Hanover Square 2 6.26x
Westminster St John 2 9.05x
Christchurch 1 12.41x
Cookham 1 23.53x
Edburton 1 476.19x
Lambeth 1 0.63x
Ramsgate 1 9.90x
Rodmersham 1 370.37x
Rusper 1 303.03x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Jurd surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 10
Ann 9
Louisa 6
Sarah 5
Fanny 4
Harriet 4
Alice 3
Charlotte 3
Eliza 3
Emma 3
Kate 3
Annie 2
Elizabeth 2
Ellen 2
Emily 2
Hester 2
Jane 2
Lydia 2
Maria 2
Martha 2
Rachel 2
Amy 1
Caroline 1
Clara 1
Edith 1
Eleanor 1
Elizth. 1
Florence 1
Hannah 1
Harriett 1
Helena 1
Jemima 1
Lavenia 1
Lily 1
Linda 1
Margaret 1
Maud 1
Nancy 1
Rosa 1
Rosina 1
Sireia 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Jurd surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 16
Charles 10
Thomas 10
George 7
James 7
Alfred 5
Albert 4
Edward 4
Frederick 4
Robert 4
John 3
Walter 3
Arthur 2
Harry 2
Richard 2
Edwin 1
Ernest 1
Henry 1
Lloyd 1
Oliver 1
Osborne 1
Reuben 1
Samuel 1
Wm.H. 1

FAQ

Jurd surname: questions and answers

How common was the Jurd surname in 1881?

In 1881, 186 people were recorded with the Jurd surname. That placed it at #13,448 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Jurd surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 203 in 2016. That gives Jurd a modern rank of #19,396.

What does the Jurd map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Jurd bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.