NameCensus.

UK surname

Lashmar

In the 1881 census there were 98 people recorded with the Lashmar surname, ranking it #19,999 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 321, ranked #14,065, up from #19,999 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Newchurch and Margate. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Bournemouth, South Holland and Barrow-in-Furness.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lashmar is 364 in 2003. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 227.6%.

1881 census count

98

Ranked #19,999

Modern count

321

2016, ranked #14,065

Peak year

2003

364 bearers

Map years

6

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Lashmar had 98 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #19,999 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 321 in 2016, ranked #14,065.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 224 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Lashmar surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lashmar surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lashmar surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lashmar over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 87 #18,695
1861 historical 89 #22,419
1881 historical 98 #19,999
1891 historical 166 #17,077
1901 historical 203 #14,969
1911 historical 224 #13,914
1997 modern 337 #12,522
1998 modern 352 #12,489
1999 modern 357 #12,433
2000 modern 353 #12,480
2001 modern 349 #12,392
2002 modern 349 #12,652
2003 modern 364 #12,068
2004 modern 358 #12,252
2005 modern 347 #12,436
2006 modern 339 #12,754
2007 modern 341 #12,840
2008 modern 340 #12,989
2009 modern 343 #13,168
2010 modern 351 #13,220
2011 modern 345 #13,221
2012 modern 344 #13,121
2013 modern 337 #13,537
2014 modern 343 #13,463
2015 modern 328 #13,840
2016 modern 321 #14,065

Geography

Back to top

Where Lashmars are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Newchurch, Margate and Brighton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Bournemouth, South Holland, Barrow-in-Furness, Reigate and Banstead and Horsham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Newchurch Hampshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Margate Kent
5 Brighton Sussex

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Bournemouth 001 Bournemouth
2 South Holland 004 South Holland
3 Barrow-in-Furness 005 Barrow-in-Furness
4 Reigate and Banstead 014 Reigate and Banstead
5 Horsham 011 Horsham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lashmar

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lashmar surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lashmar

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lashmar, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Lashmar surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Lashmar household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Lashmar is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Lashmar is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Lashmar falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lashmar is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lashmar, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lashmar families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lashmar surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Sussex leads with 33 Lashmars recorded in 1881 and an index of 20.48x.

County Total Index
Sussex 33 20.48x
Surrey 24 5.15x
Middlesex 21 2.20x
Hampshire 16 8.17x
Kent 4 1.23x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Reigate Foreign in Surrey leads with 13 Lashmars recorded in 1881 and an index of 257.94x.

Place Total Index
Reigate Foreign 13 257.94x
Brighton 9 27.68x
Leominster 9 1730.77x
Amberley 8 3333.33x
Lymington 8 555.56x
Ealing 7 81.97x
Bromley London 6 28.53x
Portsea 5 13.02x
Battersea 3 8.53x
Newington 3 8.50x
Northwood 3 107.53x
St Marylebone London 3 5.88x
Tonbridge 3 25.51x
Broadwater 2 54.05x
Caterham 2 97.09x
Frant 2 175.44x
Portslade 2 202.02x
St Botolph Aldgate London 2 101.52x
Angmering 1 312.50x
Croydon 1 3.87x
Hammersmith London 1 4.25x
Islington London 1 1.08x
Lambeth 1 1.20x
Margate St John Baptist 1 16.75x
Paddington London 1 2.85x
Tandridge 1 500.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lashmar surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Annie 4
Eliza 3
Ellen 3
Louisa 3
Martha 3
Mary 3
Sarah 3
Ada 2
Alice 2
Caroline 2
Edith 2
Emma 2
Fanny 2
Paulina 2
Aice 1
Augusta 1
Catherine 1
Elizabeth 1
Elizth. 1
Ella 1
Ester 1
Grace 1
Jane 1
Jessie 1
Lilly 1
Lucy 1
Mabel 1
Maria 1
Marion 1
Matilda 1
Maud 1
Miriam 1
Octavius 1
Sophia 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lashmar surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Lashmar surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lashmar surname in 1881?

In 1881, 98 people were recorded with the Lashmar surname. That placed it at #19,999 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lashmar surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 321 in 2016. That gives Lashmar a modern rank of #14,065.

What does the Lashmar map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lashmar bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.