UK surname
In the 1881 census there were 37 people recorded with the Leack surname, ranking it #28,418 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 33, ranked #35,829, down from #28,418 in 1881.
The strongest historical links point to Lancaster Borough, Rochdale and Coveney, Manea, Mepal, Downham, Witcham, Witchford, Wentworth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.
Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Leack is 218 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 10.8%.
1881 census count
37
Ranked #28,418
Modern count
33
2016, ranked #35,829
Peak year
1861
218 bearers
Map years
3
1861 to 1911
Key insights
Map
Back to topThe map shows where the Leack surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.
Distribution map
Leack surname density by area, 1911 census.
Timeline
Back to topThe table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.
| Year | Period | Count | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | historical | 59 | #22,756 |
| 1861 | historical | 218 | #11,175 |
| 1881 | historical | 37 | #28,418 |
| 1891 | historical | 187 | #15,679 |
| 1901 | historical | 87 | #24,386 |
| 1911 | historical | 137 | #18,880 |
| 1997 | modern | 43 | #33,361 |
| 1998 | modern | 45 | #33,374 |
| 1999 | modern | 45 | #33,511 |
| 2000 | modern | 44 | #33,602 |
| 2001 | modern | 46 | #33,311 |
| 2002 | modern | 38 | #34,307 |
| 2003 | modern | 33 | #34,773 |
| 2004 | modern | 33 | #34,947 |
| 2005 | modern | 35 | #34,982 |
| 2006 | modern | 38 | #35,003 |
| 2007 | modern | 38 | #35,153 |
| 2008 | modern | 44 | #34,865 |
| 2009 | modern | 45 | #34,972 |
| 2010 | modern | 46 | #35,062 |
| 2011 | modern | 44 | #35,161 |
| 2012 | modern | 40 | #35,369 |
| 2013 | modern | 38 | #35,534 |
| 2014 | modern | 36 | #35,662 |
| 2015 | modern | 34 | #35,756 |
| 2016 | modern | 33 | #35,829 |
Geography
Back to topHistorical parish links are strongest around Lancaster Borough, Rochdale, Coveney, Manea, Mepal, Downham, Witcham, Witchford, Wentworth, Bingley and Wirksworth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.
The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.
| Rank | Parish | Area |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lancaster Borough | Lancashire |
| 2 | Rochdale | Lancashire |
| 3 | Coveney, Manea, Mepal, Downham, Witcham, Witchford, Wentworth | Cambridgeshire |
| 4 | Bingley | Yorkshire, West Riding |
| 5 | Wirksworth | Derbyshire |
| Rank | Area | District |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No data | No data |
Forenames
Back to topThese lists show first names that appear often with the Leack surname in historical and recent records.
Recent female names
Recent male names
Modern profile
Back to topModern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Leack, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.
These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.
The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.
UK neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Nationally, the Leack surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Leack household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.
London neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Within London, Leack is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.
Broadband speed
The modern neighbourhood pattern for Leack is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.
Area snapshot
This describes the area pattern most associated with Leack, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.
1881 census detail
Back to topThese tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Leack surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.
Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 32 Leacks recorded in 1881 and an index of 7.47x.
| County | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Lancashire | 32 | 7.47x |
| Middlesex | 2 | 0.55x |
| Caithness | 1 | 20.24x |
| Midlothian | 1 | 2.07x |
| Yorkshire | 1 | 0.28x |
Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Lancaster in Lancashire leads with 30 Leacks recorded in 1881 and an index of 1176.47x.
| Place | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Lancaster | 30 | 1176.47x |
| Liverpool | 2 | 7.69x |
| North Leith | 1 | 44.64x |
| Paddington London | 1 | 7.54x |
| Rastrick | 1 | 101.01x |
| St Clement Danes London | 1 | 133.33x |
| Wick | 1 | 62.50x |
These are the female first names most often recorded with the Leack surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
FAQ
In 1881, 37 people were recorded with the Leack surname. That placed it at #28,418 in the surname rankings for that year.
The latest modern count shown here is 33 in 2016. That gives Leack a modern rank of #35,829.
The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Leack bearers relative to the surrounding population.
The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.