NameCensus.

UK surname

Leacy

In the 1881 census there were 24 people recorded with the Leacy surname, ranking it #30,215 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 187, ranked #20,488, up from #30,215 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St Mary Rotherhithe, Manchester and St Thomas Southwark. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Warrington, Halton and Conwy.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Leacy is 195 in 2013. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 679.2%.

1881 census count

24

Ranked #30,215

Modern count

187

2016, ranked #20,488

Peak year

2013

195 bearers

Map years

5

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Leacy had 24 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #30,215 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 187 in 2016, ranked #20,488.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 129 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Leacy surname distribution map

The map shows where the Leacy surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Leacy surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Leacy over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 129 #14,406
1861 historical 104 #20,477
1881 historical 24 #30,215
1891 historical 99 #24,200
1901 historical 40 #29,678
1911 historical 32 #29,838
1997 modern 157 #20,513
1998 modern 155 #21,227
1999 modern 162 #20,781
2000 modern 167 #20,332
2001 modern 164 #20,279
2002 modern 171 #20,177
2003 modern 174 #19,760
2004 modern 164 #20,609
2005 modern 162 #20,716
2006 modern 158 #21,229
2007 modern 162 #21,115
2008 modern 169 #20,745
2009 modern 174 #20,782
2010 modern 181 #20,738
2011 modern 178 #20,809
2012 modern 189 #19,949
2013 modern 195 #19,857
2014 modern 187 #20,570
2015 modern 185 #20,641
2016 modern 187 #20,488

Geography

Back to top

Where Leacys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St Mary Rotherhithe, Manchester, St Thomas Southwark, St Marylebone and West Derby. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Warrington, Halton, Conwy and Lambeth. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St Mary Rotherhithe London (South Districts)
2 Manchester Lancashire
3 St Thomas Southwark London (South Districts)
4 St Marylebone London (North Districts)
5 West Derby Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Warrington 005 Warrington
2 Halton 005 Halton
3 Halton 007 Halton
4 Conwy 009 Conwy
5 Lambeth 010 Lambeth

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Leacy

These lists show first names that appear often with the Leacy surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Leacy

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Leacy, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Leacy surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Leacy household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Leacy is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Leacy is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Leacy falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Leacy is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - Irish

This describes the area pattern most associated with Leacy, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Leacy families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Leacy surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Gloucestershire leads with 8 Leacys recorded in 1881 and an index of 16.74x.

County Total Index
Gloucestershire 8 16.74x
Lancashire 7 2.42x
Middlesex 3 1.23x
Yorkshire 2 0.83x
Cumberland 1 4.77x
Durham 1 1.38x
Monmouthshire 1 5.68x
Royal Navy 1 34.48x
Wigtownshire 1 30.86x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Cheltenham in Gloucestershire leads with 7 Leacys recorded in 1881 and an index of 189.70x.

Place Total Index
Cheltenham 7 189.70x
Oswaldtwistle 4 392.16x
Accrington 3 114.07x
Dewsbury 2 80.65x
Arlecdon 1 178.57x
Caerleon 1 1111.11x
Charlton Kings 1 303.03x
Hammersmith London 1 16.67x
Islington London 1 4.23x
St Marylebone London 1 7.69x
Stockton On Tees 1 28.65x
Wigtown 1 555.56x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Leacy surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 4
Agnes 2
Mary 2
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Margaret 1
Mather 1
Selena 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Leacy surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Charles 2
George 1
Henry 1
John 1
Micheal 1
Peter 1
William 1

FAQ

Leacy surname: questions and answers

How common was the Leacy surname in 1881?

In 1881, 24 people were recorded with the Leacy surname. That placed it at #30,215 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Leacy surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 187 in 2016. That gives Leacy a modern rank of #20,488.

What does the Leacy map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Leacy bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.