NameCensus.

UK surname

Lote

In the 1881 census there were 96 people recorded with the Lote surname, ranking it #20,248 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 234, ranked #17,572, up from #20,248 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Wolverhampton, Boston (incl. Boston allotments) and Aldridge. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Walsall and Lichfield.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lote is 246 in 2009. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 143.8%.

1881 census count

96

Ranked #20,248

Modern count

234

2016, ranked #17,572

Peak year

2009

246 bearers

Map years

6

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Lote had 96 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,248 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 234 in 2016, ranked #17,572.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 211 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Lote surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lote surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lote surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lote over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 79 #19,712
1861 historical 97 #21,503
1881 historical 96 #20,248
1891 historical 137 #19,501
1901 historical 141 #18,718
1911 historical 211 #14,467
1997 modern 218 #16,704
1998 modern 228 #16,706
1999 modern 225 #16,931
2000 modern 226 #16,840
2001 modern 218 #17,017
2002 modern 228 #16,828
2003 modern 233 #16,394
2004 modern 234 #16,416
2005 modern 225 #16,831
2006 modern 228 #16,789
2007 modern 230 #16,890
2008 modern 244 #16,346
2009 modern 246 #16,597
2010 modern 240 #17,230
2011 modern 232 #17,481
2012 modern 233 #17,339
2013 modern 239 #17,307
2014 modern 238 #17,480
2015 modern 237 #17,413
2016 modern 234 #17,572

Geography

Back to top

Where Lotes are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wolverhampton, Boston (incl. Boston allotments), Aldridge, Norton-under-Cannock with Little Wyrley and Wednesbury. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Walsall and Lichfield. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wolverhampton Staffordshire
2 Boston (incl. Boston allotments) Lincolnshire
3 Aldridge Staffordshire
4 Norton-under-Cannock with Little Wyrley Staffordshire
5 Wednesbury Staffordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Walsall 004 Walsall
2 Walsall 002 Walsall
3 Walsall 007 Walsall
4 Walsall 015 Walsall
5 Lichfield 010 Lichfield

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lote

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lote surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lote

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lote, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Lote surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Lote household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Lote is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Lote is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Lote falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lote is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lote, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lote families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lote surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Staffordshire leads with 58 Lotes recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.54x.

County Total Index
Staffordshire 58 18.54x
Lincolnshire 14 9.45x
Warwickshire 6 2.57x
Gloucestershire 5 2.75x
Surrey 4 0.89x
Shropshire 3 3.75x
Lancashire 2 0.18x
Cardiganshire 1 4.42x
Kent 1 0.32x
Worcestershire 1 0.83x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Aldridge in Staffordshire leads with 23 Lotes recorded in 1881 and an index of 3833.33x.

Place Total Index
Aldridge 23 3833.33x
Boston 12 266.67x
Willenhall 11 187.71x
Ogley Hay 7 1076.92x
Walsall Foreign 6 37.13x
Birmingham 5 6.42x
Bristol St George 5 59.45x
Bilston 3 49.51x
Clun 3 526.32x
Stoke Upon Trent 3 9.04x
Bermondsey 2 7.25x
Great Barr 2 555.56x
Lambeth 2 2.48x
St Maryle Wigford 2 173.91x
Wolverhampton 2 8.32x
Chilvers Coton 1 104.17x
Dover Castle 1 434.78x
Llanddewi Aberarth 1 217.39x
Preston 1 3.40x
Shenstone 1 125.00x
Worsley 1 14.75x
Yardley 1 32.26x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lote surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lote surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Lote surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lote surname in 1881?

In 1881, 96 people were recorded with the Lote surname. That placed it at #20,248 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lote surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 234 in 2016. That gives Lote a modern rank of #17,572.

What does the Lote map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lote bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.