NameCensus.

UK surname

Lound

In the 1881 census there were 165 people recorded with the Lound surname, ranking it #14,559 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 253, ranked #16,671, down from #14,559 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Marfleet, St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju and Firbeck. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Rotherham, Bolsover and South Kesteven.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lound is 261 in 2013. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 53.3%.

1881 census count

165

Ranked #14,559

Modern count

253

2016, ranked #16,671

Peak year

2013

261 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Lound had 165 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,559 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 253 in 2016, ranked #16,671.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 204 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Lound surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lound surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lound surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lound over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 101 #17,036
1861 historical 123 #17,914
1881 historical 165 #14,559
1891 historical 192 #15,383
1901 historical 200 #15,120
1911 historical 204 #14,784
1997 modern 239 #15,718
1998 modern 244 #15,947
1999 modern 250 #15,802
2000 modern 254 #15,578
2001 modern 250 #15,527
2002 modern 253 #15,677
2003 modern 245 #15,822
2004 modern 249 #15,739
2005 modern 244 #15,900
2006 modern 249 #15,784
2007 modern 238 #16,505
2008 modern 232 #16,931
2009 modern 245 #16,646
2010 modern 255 #16,563
2011 modern 253 #16,493
2012 modern 260 #16,090
2013 modern 261 #16,309
2014 modern 261 #16,421
2015 modern 255 #16,564
2016 modern 253 #16,671

Geography

Back to top

Where Lounds are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Marfleet, St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju, Firbeck, Bytham, Little and Rawmarsh, Wath-on-Dearn (Swinton). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Rotherham, Bolsover and South Kesteven. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Marfleet Yorkshire, East Riding
2 St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju Norfolk
3 Firbeck Nottinghamshire
4 Bytham, Little Lincolnshire
5 Rawmarsh, Wath-on-Dearn (Swinton) Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Rotherham 005 Rotherham
2 Bolsover 007 Bolsover
3 South Kesteven 010 South Kesteven
4 Rotherham 010 Rotherham
5 Bolsover 006 Bolsover

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lound

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lound surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lound

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lound, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Lound surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Lound household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Inner London Working Professionals

Within London, Lound is most associated with areas classed as Inner London Working Professionals, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These primarily Inner London neighbourhoods are more densely populated than the Supergroup average. Residents have a younger over-all age profile than the Supergroup as a whole, and are less likely to be owner occupiers. Full time employment is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup and multiple car ownership is uncommon. Chinese and non-EU-born European migrants are less in evidence than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Lound is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Lound falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lound is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lound, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lound families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lound surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 61 Lounds recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.82x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 61 3.82x
Lincolnshire 57 22.15x
Norfolk 14 5.66x
Middlesex 8 0.50x
Surrey 5 0.64x
Derbyshire 4 1.59x
Northamptonshire 4 2.64x
Dorset 3 2.84x
Leicestershire 3 1.68x
Berkshire 2 1.66x
Lancashire 2 0.10x
Rutland 1 8.46x
Staffordshire 1 0.18x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Firbeck in Yorkshire leads with 9 Lounds recorded in 1881 and an index of 6428.57x.

Place Total Index
Firbeck 9 6428.57x
Little Bytham 8 4705.88x
Rawmarsh 7 124.33x
Castle Bytham 6 1666.67x
Kimberworth 6 67.80x
West Newton W Burton 6 7500.00x
Wilsford 6 1578.95x
Bourn 5 240.38x
Carlby 5 5555.56x
Crowland 5 310.56x
Marfleet 5 5000.00x
Morton In Bourn 5 961.54x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 4 26.92x
Barnsley 4 24.32x
Ellerker 4 2500.00x
Peterborough 4 36.50x
Walden Stubbs 4 5000.00x
Camberwell 3 2.92x
Catfield 3 857.14x
Chelsea London 3 6.19x
Great Yarmouth 3 14.63x
Kensington London 3 3.35x
Laughton En Le Morthen 3 810.81x
North Witham 3 2307.69x
Norwich St Julian 3 288.46x
Ormesby St Margaret W 3 483.87x
Rotherham 3 33.37x
Sheffield 3 5.91x
Weymouth 3 150.00x
Alfreton 2 26.14x
Beighton 2 175.44x
Boston 2 25.61x
Cookham 2 53.05x
Counthorpe 2 5000.00x
Edenham 2 645.16x
Paddington London 2 3.38x
Quorndon 2 200.00x
Bayards Leap 1 370.37x
Bicker 1 250.00x
Braceborough 1 1000.00x
Creeton 1 3333.33x
Dunsby 1 833.33x
Gate Fulford 1 26.88x
Ingham 1 400.00x
Lambeth 1 0.71x
Leicester St Mary 1 6.93x
Norwich St Peter 1 61.73x
Orell Ford 1 285.71x
Ottringham 1 312.50x
Partney 1 416.67x
Putney 1 13.62x
Rishton 1 44.64x
Ryhall 1 256.41x
Skirbeck 1 69.44x
Sproatley Wyton 1 434.78x
Stafford St Mary 1 13.00x
Thurlby Obthorpe 1 294.12x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lound surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 16
Elizabeth 9
Jane 6
Sarah 5
Emma 4
Alice 3
Annie 3
Eliza 3
Fanny 3
Hannah 3
Susan 3
Clara 2
Ellen 2
Florence 2
Louisa 2
Lucy 2
Maria 2
Ada 1
Albertina 1
Amy 1
Ann 1
Eleanor 1
Emily 1
F. 1
Frances 1
Henrietta 1
James 1
Janey 1
Julia 1
Mara 1
Martha 1
Matilda 1
Millie 1
Rose 1
Susannah 1
Thirzah 1
Tryphena 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lound surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 18
George 8
William 7
Thomas 5
David 3
Henry 3
Alfred 2
Cornelius 2
James 2
Philip 2
Robert 2
A.G. 1
Albert 1
Andrew 1
Arthur 1
Benj. 1
Earnest 1
Edmund 1
Edward 1
Ernest 1
Frederic 1
Herbert 1
Jesse 1
Joseph 1
Joshua 1
Laurentina 1
Sidney 1
Stanley 1
Walderma 1
Walter 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Lound surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lound surname in 1881?

In 1881, 165 people were recorded with the Lound surname. That placed it at #14,559 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lound surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 253 in 2016. That gives Lound a modern rank of #16,671.

What does the Lound map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lound bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.