NameCensus.

UK surname

Lulham

In the 1881 census there were 110 people recorded with the Lulham surname, ranking it #18,695 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 133, ranked #25,765, down from #18,695 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hastings St Mary-in-the-Castle, Hastings St Andrew, Kingston-on-Thames and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Wealden, Torridge and Tunbridge Wells.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lulham is 189 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 20.9%.

1881 census count

110

Ranked #18,695

Modern count

133

2016, ranked #25,765

Peak year

1891

189 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Lulham had 110 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,695 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 133 in 2016, ranked #25,765.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 189 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Lulham surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lulham surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lulham surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lulham over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 84 #19,067
1861 historical 111 #19,429
1881 historical 110 #18,695
1891 historical 189 #15,547
1901 historical 176 #16,401
1911 historical 163 #16,939
1997 modern 149 #21,214
1998 modern 157 #21,058
1999 modern 162 #20,781
2000 modern 152 #21,603
2001 modern 149 #21,568
2002 modern 145 #22,392
2003 modern 146 #22,069
2004 modern 138 #22,997
2005 modern 146 #22,146
2006 modern 149 #22,013
2007 modern 148 #22,406
2008 modern 152 #22,225
2009 modern 152 #22,716
2010 modern 152 #23,282
2011 modern 147 #23,627
2012 modern 144 #23,902
2013 modern 142 #24,547
2014 modern 142 #24,734
2015 modern 141 #24,723
2016 modern 133 #25,765

Geography

Back to top

Where Lulhams are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hastings St Mary-in-the-Castle, Hastings St Andrew, Kingston-on-Thames, London parishes, Ashburnham, Dallington, Brightling, Ninfield and Hurstmonceux, Wartling. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Wealden, Torridge, Tunbridge Wells and Wokingham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hastings St Mary-in-the-Castle, Hastings St Andrew Sussex
2 Kingston-on-Thames Surrey
3 London parishes London 3
4 Ashburnham, Dallington, Brightling, Ninfield Sussex
5 Hurstmonceux, Wartling Sussex

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Wealden 018 Wealden
2 Torridge 008 Torridge
3 Tunbridge Wells 003 Tunbridge Wells
4 Wokingham 020 Wokingham
5 Wealden 011 Wealden

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lulham

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lulham surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lulham

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lulham, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Lulham surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Lulham household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Lulham is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Lulham is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Lulham falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lulham is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lulham, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lulham families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lulham surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Sussex leads with 69 Lulhams recorded in 1881 and an index of 38.14x.

County Total Index
Sussex 69 38.14x
Surrey 20 3.83x
Middlesex 13 1.21x
Gloucestershire 2 0.95x
Kent 2 0.55x
Berkshire 1 1.24x
Glamorgan 1 0.54x
Hampshire 1 0.45x
Midlothian 1 0.70x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Brighton in Sussex leads with 11 Lulhams recorded in 1881 and an index of 30.14x.

Place Total Index
Brighton 11 30.14x
Clayton 9 1323.53x
Hastings St Mary In The 8 207.25x
Keymer 8 625.00x
East Molesey 7 578.51x
Hastings Holy Trinity 6 451.13x
Rotherhithe 6 45.25x
Warbleton 6 1111.11x
Arlington 4 1818.18x
Dallington 4 2000.00x
Kingston On Thames 4 31.85x
Chelsea London 3 9.28x
Hove 3 37.78x
Kensington London 3 5.03x
Lambeth 3 3.21x
Lower Beeding 3 625.00x
Deptford St Paul 2 7.08x
Hastings St Leonards 2 75.19x
Horsham 2 56.98x
St Dunstan In West London 2 606.06x
Whitcombe Magna 2 3333.33x
Cardiff St John 1 16.39x
Findon 1 384.62x
Hastings St Mary 1 22.22x
Heene 1 322.58x
Hound 1 67.11x
Islington London 1 0.96x
Mile End Old Town London 1 4.38x
New Windsor 1 36.90x
Queensferry 1 666.67x
St George Bloomsbury 1 16.23x
St Pancras London 1 1.16x
Westminster St John 1 7.65x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lulham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 4
Eliza 3
Elizabeth 3
Jane 3
Ruth 3
Sarah 3
Alice 2
Annie 2
Bessie 2
Charlotte 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Lillian 2
Phillis 2
Rhoda 2
Beatrice 1
Caroline 1
E. 1
Edith 1
Elizth.Jane 1
Ethel 1
Eveline 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Francis 1
Hannah 1
Harriet 1
Hilda 1
Jessie 1
Kathleen 1
Lea 1
Leah 1
Louisa 1
Mabel 1
Mable 1
Maria 1
Marie 1
Mrs 1
Rachel 1
Rebecca 1
Rosalie 1
Winnie 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lulham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Lulham surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lulham surname in 1881?

In 1881, 110 people were recorded with the Lulham surname. That placed it at #18,695 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lulham surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 133 in 2016. That gives Lulham a modern rank of #25,765.

What does the Lulham map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lulham bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.