NameCensus.

UK surname

Melbourn

In the 1881 census there were 121 people recorded with the Melbourn surname, ranking it #17,671 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 41, ranked #35,388, down from #17,671 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Shelford, Great, St Pancras and Walpole St Peter and St Andrew. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Melbourn is 160 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 66.1%.

1881 census count

121

Ranked #17,671

Modern count

41

2016, ranked #35,388

Peak year

1851

160 bearers

Map years

5

1851 to 1901

Key insights

  • Melbourn had 121 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,671 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 41 in 2016, ranked #35,388.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 160 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Melbourn surname distribution map

The map shows where the Melbourn surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Melbourn surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Melbourn over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 160 #12,347
1861 historical 138 #16,365
1881 historical 121 #17,671
1891 historical 125 #20,713
1901 historical 131 #19,552
1911 historical 79 #24,903
1997 modern 47 #32,975
1998 modern 51 #32,816
1999 modern 50 #33,041
2000 modern 49 #33,187
2001 modern 51 #32,850
2002 modern 50 #33,282
2003 modern 49 #33,456
2004 modern 49 #33,647
2005 modern 46 #34,081
2006 modern 44 #34,568
2007 modern 42 #34,905
2008 modern 44 #34,865
2009 modern 45 #34,972
2010 modern 41 #35,358
2011 modern 49 #34,868
2012 modern 44 #35,164
2013 modern 44 #35,222
2014 modern 37 #35,616
2015 modern 39 #35,472
2016 modern 41 #35,388

Geography

Back to top

Where Melbourns are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Shelford, Great, St Pancras, Walpole St Peter and St Andrew, Cranwell (incl. Bayard's Leap) and Wirksworth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Shelford, Great Cambridgeshire
2 St Pancras London (North Districts)
3 Walpole St Peter and St Andrew Cambridgeshire
4 Cranwell (incl. Bayard's Leap) Lincolnshire
5 Wirksworth Derbyshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Melbourn

These lists show first names that appear often with the Melbourn surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Melbourn

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Melbourn, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Melbourn surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Melbourn household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Melbourn is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Melbourn is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Melbourn, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Melbourn families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Melbourn surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lincolnshire leads with 44 Melbourns recorded in 1881 and an index of 23.32x.

County Total Index
Lincolnshire 44 23.32x
Cambridgeshire 16 21.40x
Yorkshire 14 1.20x
Northamptonshire 8 7.21x
Middlesex 7 0.59x
Lancashire 5 0.36x
Norfolk 5 2.76x
Surrey 5 0.87x
Cheshire 4 1.54x
Staffordshire 4 1.00x
Derbyshire 3 1.62x
Essex 2 0.86x
Kent 2 0.50x
Devon 1 0.41x
Somerset 1 0.53x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Cranwell in Lincolnshire leads with 9 Melbourns recorded in 1881 and an index of 11250.00x.

Place Total Index
Cranwell 9 11250.00x
Peterborough 8 99.50x
Potter Hanworth 8 4444.44x
Bethnal Green London 6 11.70x
Great Shelford 6 1538.46x
Nocton 6 2400.00x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 5 45.87x
Market Deeping 5 1020.41x
Radcliffe 5 74.07x
Sheffield 5 13.43x
Swavesey 5 1041.67x
Deeping St Nicholas 4 727.27x
Fillingham 4 3333.33x
Leigh Field 4 3636.36x
Monks Coppenhall 4 40.69x
Thames Ditton 4 336.13x
Callow 3 7500.00x
Spalding 3 80.00x
St Andrewthe Less 3 35.13x
Boston 2 34.90x
Holy Trinity 2 7.11x
Letheringsett 2 1666.67x
Thornage 2 1538.46x
Tonbridge 2 13.77x
Walthamstow 2 23.84x
Bedminster 1 5.60x
Beverley St Mary 1 58.48x
Dembleby 1 3333.33x
Doddington 1 181.82x
Fleet 1 185.19x
Holbeach 1 47.62x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 1 18.35x
Kingston On Thames 1 7.24x
Plymouth Charles The 1 9.24x
Sculcoates 1 5.39x
Shoreditch London 1 1.95x
Upwell 1 181.82x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Melbourn surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Melbourn surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
John 8
Thomas 6
Charles 4
James 4
Robert 4
Henry 3
Charlie 2
Edward 2
George 2
Alfred 1
Daniel 1
Edwin 1
Frederick 1
Georg 1
Isaac 1
Joseph 1
Leonard 1
Leslie 1
Newell 1
Newill 1
Reginald 1
Samuel 1
Stanley 1

FAQ

Melbourn surname: questions and answers

How common was the Melbourn surname in 1881?

In 1881, 121 people were recorded with the Melbourn surname. That placed it at #17,671 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Melbourn surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 41 in 2016. That gives Melbourn a modern rank of #35,388.

What does the Melbourn map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Melbourn bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.