NameCensus.

UK surname

Mitchley

In the 1881 census there were 124 people recorded with the Mitchley surname, ranking it #17,429 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 125, ranked #26,827, down from #17,429 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to King's Lynn St Margaret, London parishes and Battersea. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Wigan, Waverley and Fenland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Mitchley is 193 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 0.8%.

1881 census count

124

Ranked #17,429

Modern count

125

2016, ranked #26,827

Peak year

1911

193 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Mitchley had 124 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,429 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016, ranked #26,827.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 193 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Mitchley surname distribution map

The map shows where the Mitchley surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Mitchley surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Mitchley over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 84 #19,067
1861 historical 90 #22,312
1881 historical 124 #17,429
1891 historical 179 #16,198
1901 historical 189 #15,684
1911 historical 193 #15,294
1997 modern 137 #22,301
1998 modern 138 #22,814
1999 modern 136 #23,186
2000 modern 139 #22,855
2001 modern 137 #22,740
2002 modern 131 #23,793
2003 modern 131 #23,553
2004 modern 134 #23,425
2005 modern 118 #25,301
2006 modern 120 #25,269
2007 modern 121 #25,469
2008 modern 122 #25,638
2009 modern 118 #26,766
2010 modern 130 #25,775
2011 modern 130 #25,547
2012 modern 130 #25,559
2013 modern 130 #26,074
2014 modern 131 #26,089
2015 modern 123 #27,088
2016 modern 125 #26,827

Geography

Back to top

Where Mitchleys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around King's Lynn St Margaret, London parishes, Battersea, Hunstanton and Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Wigan, Waverley, Fenland and Tunbridge Wells. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 King's Lynn St Margaret Norfolk
2 London parishes London 3
3 Battersea London (South Districts)
4 Hunstanton Norfolk
5 Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict Cambridgeshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Wigan 014 Wigan
2 Wigan 018 Wigan
3 Waverley 015 Waverley
4 Fenland 006 Fenland
5 Tunbridge Wells 002 Tunbridge Wells

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Mitchley

These lists show first names that appear often with the Mitchley surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Mitchley

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Mitchley, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Mitchley surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Mitchley household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Mitchley is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Mitchley is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Mitchley falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Mitchley is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Mitchley, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Mitchley families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Mitchley surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 60 Mitchleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 32.27x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 60 32.27x
Yorkshire 16 1.33x
Surrey 14 2.38x
Staffordshire 7 1.71x
Berkshire 6 6.61x
Middlesex 4 0.33x
Suffolk 4 2.72x
Sussex 4 1.96x
Cambridgeshire 3 3.92x
Buckinghamshire 1 1.37x
Derbyshire 1 0.53x
Hampshire 1 0.40x
Kent 1 0.24x
Warwickshire 1 0.33x
Worcestershire 1 0.63x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stanhoe in Norfolk leads with 17 Mitchleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 9444.44x.

Place Total Index
Stanhoe 17 9444.44x
Battersea 9 20.22x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 8 143.37x
Harborne 7 53.52x
Heigham 7 70.14x
Hunstanton 7 1111.11x
Cookham 6 212.01x
Leeds 6 8.87x
Chichester All Sts 4 2857.14x
Drypool 4 218.58x
Ipswich St Margaret 4 80.00x
Middlesbrough 4 25.62x
Norwich St Julian 4 512.82x
South Lynn 4 190.48x
Acle 3 789.47x
Leatherhead 3 202.70x
Norwich St Gregory 3 909.09x
Burnham Westgate 2 500.00x
Castleford 2 45.87x
Tittleshall 2 952.38x
Wisbech St Peter 2 52.08x
Aston 1 1.19x
Bethnal Green London 1 1.90x
Bromley London 1 3.76x
Castle Acre 1 181.82x
Elm 1 133.33x
Farnborough 1 38.46x
Hackney London 1 1.47x
Hanworth 1 238.10x
Hoveton St John 1 833.33x
Newport Pagnell 1 65.36x
Redditch 1 31.25x
Rotherhithe 1 6.69x
Wandsworth 1 8.59x
Whissonsett 1 400.00x
Wirksworth 1 58.14x
Yalding 1 96.15x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Mitchley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 9
Ann 5
Elizabeth 4
Sarah 4
Susan 4
Florence 3
Hannah 3
Alice 2
Beatrice 2
Edith 2
Emma 2
Fanny 2
Martha 2
Rosa 2
Annie 1
Caroline 1
Clara 1
Ellen 1
Emily 1
Eva 1
Flora 1
Gertrude 1
Harriett 1
Isabel 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Jemima 1
Lilian 1
Louisa 1
Lousia 1
Margaret 1
Pleasance 1
Rosanna 1
Rose 1
Rosella 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Mitchley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 12
William 6
Henry 5
David 3
Ambrose 2
Arthur 2
Herbert 2
Jabez 2
Joseph 2
Matthew 2
Robert 2
Thomas 2
Zachariah 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Alonzo 1
Cecil 1
Frederick 1
George 1
Harold 1
Howard 1
Jarvis 1
Jas.Kinder 1
Ralph 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Mitchley surname: questions and answers

How common was the Mitchley surname in 1881?

In 1881, 124 people were recorded with the Mitchley surname. That placed it at #17,429 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Mitchley surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016. That gives Mitchley a modern rank of #26,827.

What does the Mitchley map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Mitchley bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.