NameCensus.

UK surname

Ottoway

In the 1881 census there were 133 people recorded with the Ottoway surname, ranking it #16,676 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 28, ranked #36,125, down from #16,676 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Barnet, Chipping, Kingston-on-Thames and Woking. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Ottoway is 183 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 78.9%.

1881 census count

133

Ranked #16,676

Modern count

28

2016, ranked #36,125

Peak year

1891

183 bearers

Map years

3

1881 to 1901

Key insights

  • Ottoway had 133 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,676 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 28 in 2016, ranked #36,125.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 183 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Ottoway surname distribution map

The map shows where the Ottoway surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Ottoway surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Ottoway over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 48 #24,615
1861 historical 33 #29,814
1881 historical 133 #16,676
1891 historical 183 #15,918
1901 historical 166 #17,011
1911 historical 54 #27,423
1997 modern 37 #33,964
1998 modern 44 #33,462
1999 modern 38 #34,142
2000 modern 36 #34,317
2001 modern 35 #34,261
2002 modern 32 #34,790
2003 modern 29 #35,129
2004 modern 25 #35,610
2005 modern 30 #35,347
2006 modern 27 #35,746
2007 modern 28 #35,801
2008 modern 29 #35,808
2009 modern 28 #35,988
2010 modern 32 #35,848
2011 modern 29 #36,004
2012 modern 33 #35,767
2013 modern 28 #36,096
2014 modern 27 #36,180
2015 modern 28 #36,106
2016 modern 28 #36,125

Geography

Back to top

Where Ottoways are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Barnet, Chipping, Kingston-on-Thames, Woking, Chertsey and Mansfield Woodhouse. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Barnet, Chipping Middlesex (Exclusive Of London Districts)
2 Kingston-on-Thames Surrey
3 Woking Surrey
4 Chertsey Surrey
5 Mansfield Woodhouse Nottinghamshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Ottoway

These lists show first names that appear often with the Ottoway surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Ottoway

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Ottoway, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Ottoway surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Ottoway household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Ottoway is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Ottoway is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Ottoway, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Ottoway families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Ottoway surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Surrey leads with 32 Ottoways recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.30x.

County Total Index
Surrey 32 5.30x
Middlesex 31 2.50x
Kent 20 4.73x
Berkshire 10 10.76x
Nottinghamshire 10 5.99x
Yorkshire 8 0.65x
Hertfordshire 5 5.86x
Staffordshire 3 0.72x
Wiltshire 3 2.74x
Sussex 2 0.96x
Cheshire 1 0.37x
Hampshire 1 0.39x
Somerset 1 0.50x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Mansfield Woodhouse in Nottinghamshire leads with 10 Ottoways recorded in 1881 and an index of 900.90x.

Place Total Index
Mansfield Woodhouse 10 900.90x
Hornsey 9 57.47x
Islington London 9 7.50x
Winkfield 9 584.42x
Biddenden 8 1379.31x
Rotherham 8 115.61x
Woking 7 192.31x
Kingston On Thames 6 41.38x
Chipping Barnet 5 335.57x
Reigate Foreign 5 76.45x
Tonbridge 5 32.81x
Canterbury Holy Cross 4 975.61x
Cheam 3 461.54x
Chelsea London 3 8.04x
Fisherton Anger 3 147.78x
Horsell 3 789.47x
West Bromwich 3 12.53x
Thames Ditton 2 160.00x
Westminster St John 2 13.26x
Altrincham 1 20.92x
Alverstoke 1 10.88x
Ashford 1 24.27x
Clerkenwell London 1 3.42x
Egham 1 26.95x
Hackney London 1 1.44x
Hampton London 1 49.02x
Hastings St Mary 1 19.23x
Hastings St Mary In The 1 22.42x
Heston 1 24.33x
Kensington London 1 1.45x
Kilmersdon 1 102.04x
Leatherhead 1 66.23x
Lewisham 1 4.44x
Old Windsor 1 92.59x
Ratcliffe London 1 14.62x
Shalford 1 149.25x
Southwark St George Martyr 1 4.01x
St Pancras London 1 1.00x
Stoke 1 35.09x
Twickenham 1 18.83x
Upchurch 1 208.33x
Walton On Thames 1 36.10x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Ottoway surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Ottoway surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 7
John 6
William 6
Alfred 4
Walter 4
Charles 3
James 3
Richard 3
Thomas 3
Arthur 2
Edward 2
Henry 2
Herbert 2
C.H. 1
Cecil 1
Charlie 1
Edwin 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Matilda 1
Robert 1
Sturgus 1
Valintina 1

FAQ

Ottoway surname: questions and answers

How common was the Ottoway surname in 1881?

In 1881, 133 people were recorded with the Ottoway surname. That placed it at #16,676 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Ottoway surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 28 in 2016. That gives Ottoway a modern rank of #36,125.

What does the Ottoway map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Ottoway bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.