NameCensus.

UK surname

Patfield

In the 1881 census there were 116 people recorded with the Patfield surname, ranking it #18,126 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 80, ranked #33,030, down from #18,126 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), Dudley and Pilton, North Wootton, Shepton Mallet, Croscombe. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Patfield is 143 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 31.0%.

1881 census count

116

Ranked #18,126

Modern count

80

2016, ranked #33,030

Peak year

1891

143 bearers

Map years

4

1861 to 1911

Key insights

  • Patfield had 116 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,126 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 80 in 2016, ranked #33,030.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 143 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Patfield surname distribution map

The map shows where the Patfield surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Patfield surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Patfield over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 77 #19,998
1861 historical 104 #20,477
1881 historical 116 #18,126
1891 historical 143 #18,920
1901 historical 91 #23,921
1911 historical 102 #22,465
1997 modern 77 #29,874
1998 modern 79 #30,080
1999 modern 79 #30,243
2000 modern 75 #30,668
2001 modern 73 #30,699
2002 modern 78 #30,601
2003 modern 77 #30,762
2004 modern 72 #31,488
2005 modern 75 #31,400
2006 modern 77 #31,510
2007 modern 73 #32,287
2008 modern 74 #32,460
2009 modern 73 #32,923
2010 modern 72 #33,324
2011 modern 74 #33,151
2012 modern 75 #33,263
2013 modern 74 #33,483
2014 modern 76 #33,423
2015 modern 79 #33,127
2016 modern 80 #33,030

Geography

Back to top

Where Patfields are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), Dudley, Pilton, North Wootton, Shepton Mallet, Croscombe, Chertsey and Dunham, Little. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos) Glamorganshire
2 Dudley Staffordshire
3 Pilton, North Wootton, Shepton Mallet, Croscombe Somerset
4 Chertsey Surrey
5 Dunham, Little Norfolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Patfield

These lists show first names that appear often with the Patfield surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Patfield

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Patfield, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Patfield surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Patfield household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Patfield is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Patfield is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Patfield, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Patfield families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Patfield surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 25 Patfields recorded in 1881 and an index of 14.37x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 25 14.37x
Somerset 17 9.33x
Monmouthshire 15 18.34x
Middlesex 10 0.88x
Durham 7 2.08x
Berkshire 6 7.06x
Hertfordshire 6 7.69x
Worcestershire 6 4.06x
Kent 5 1.30x
Lancashire 5 0.37x
Dorset 4 5.39x
Glamorgan 4 2.03x
Northumberland 3 1.78x
Surrey 3 0.54x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Shepton Mallet in Somerset leads with 16 Patfields recorded in 1881 and an index of 784.31x.

Place Total Index
Shepton Mallet 16 784.31x
Bedwellty 13 90.03x
Little Dunham 9 7500.00x
Foulsham 7 1891.89x
Stockton On Tees 7 43.13x
Bishop Stortford 6 230.77x
Dudley 6 33.41x
Tilehurst 6 348.84x
Bromley London 4 16.07x
Everton 4 9.35x
Backworth 3 666.67x
Great Massingham 3 882.35x
Shaftesbury St James 3 769.23x
Billingford In Mitford 2 1666.67x
Charlton 2 78.13x
Chertsey 2 56.18x
Gelligaer 2 44.44x
Greenwich 2 11.10x
Little Massingham 2 3333.33x
Llanhilleth 2 370.37x
Shoreditch London 2 4.08x
St George Hanover 2 13.54x
Ystradyfodwg 2 11.57x
East Farleigh 1 153.85x
Heston 1 26.60x
Monckton Combe 1 172.41x
Newington 1 2.39x
Norwich St Mary In Marsh 1 500.00x
Pendleton In Salford 1 6.25x
Poole St James 1 35.84x
St Pancras London 1 1.10x
Weasenham All Sts 1 714.29x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Patfield surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 7
Ann 4
Emma 4
Mary 4
Annie 3
Jane 3
Jessie 3
Ellen 2
Emily 2
Florence 2
Kate 2
Louisa 2
Sarah 2
Agnes 1
Alice 1
Babe 1
Blanch 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Edeth 1
Eliza 1
Elizh. 1
Elvina 1
Fanny 1
Flaraicit 1
Frances 1
Harriett 1
Martha 1
Pheba 1
Rose 1
Winifred 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Patfield surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
George 5
John 5
Thomas 5
Alfred 3
Edward 3
Henry 3
James 2
Mark 2
Robert 2
Sidney 2
...ty 1
Algernon 1
Elisha 1
Ernest 1
F. 1
Farnham 1
Frederick 1
Herbert 1
Isaac 1
Joseph 1
Noah 1
Sydney 1
Walter 1
Willie 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Patfield surname: questions and answers

How common was the Patfield surname in 1881?

In 1881, 116 people were recorded with the Patfield surname. That placed it at #18,126 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Patfield surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 80 in 2016. That gives Patfield a modern rank of #33,030.

What does the Patfield map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Patfield bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.