NameCensus.

UK surname

Pescott

In the 1881 census there were 139 people recorded with the Pescott surname, ranking it #16,228 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 145, ranked #24,293, down from #16,228 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Amberley, Catherington, Waterloo and Broadwater (incl. Worthing), Nuthurst. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Chichester, Horsham and Worthing.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Pescott is 190 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 4.3%.

1881 census count

139

Ranked #16,228

Modern count

145

2016, ranked #24,293

Peak year

1851

190 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Pescott had 139 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,228 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 145 in 2016, ranked #24,293.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 190 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Pescott surname distribution map

The map shows where the Pescott surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Pescott surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Pescott over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 190 #10,852
1861 historical 151 #15,209
1881 historical 139 #16,228
1891 historical 145 #18,752
1901 historical 136 #19,110
1911 historical 155 #17,485
1997 modern 156 #20,593
1998 modern 151 #21,578
1999 modern 154 #21,455
2000 modern 151 #21,684
2001 modern 148 #21,664
2002 modern 157 #21,261
2003 modern 150 #21,669
2004 modern 147 #22,094
2005 modern 139 #22,887
2006 modern 137 #23,270
2007 modern 130 #24,389
2008 modern 132 #24,476
2009 modern 130 #25,176
2010 modern 132 #25,519
2011 modern 133 #25,177
2012 modern 139 #24,485
2013 modern 142 #24,547
2014 modern 144 #24,504
2015 modern 141 #24,723
2016 modern 145 #24,293

Geography

Back to top

Where Pescotts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Amberley, Catherington, Waterloo, Broadwater (incl. Worthing), Nuthurst, London parishes and Newcastle All Saints. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Chichester, Horsham, Worthing, Wealden and Arun. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Amberley Sussex
2 Catherington, Waterloo Hampshire
3 Broadwater (incl. Worthing), Nuthurst Sussex
4 London parishes London 3
5 Newcastle All Saints Northumberland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Chichester 007 Chichester
2 Horsham 010 Horsham
3 Worthing 011 Worthing
4 Wealden 013 Wealden
5 Arun 006 Arun

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Pescott

These lists show first names that appear often with the Pescott surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Pescott

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Pescott, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Pescott surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Pescott household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Pescott is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Pescott is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Pescott falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Pescott is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Pescott, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Pescott families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Pescott surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Sussex leads with 58 Pescotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 24.32x.

County Total Index
Sussex 58 24.32x
Hampshire 21 7.24x
Surrey 16 2.32x
Middlesex 9 0.64x
Durham 8 1.90x
Northumberland 8 3.80x
Channel Islands 6 14.32x
Cheshire 6 1.92x
Yorkshire 4 0.29x
Lancashire 3 0.18x
Cambridgeshire 2 2.23x
Berkshire 1 0.94x
Cumberland 1 0.82x
Gloucestershire 1 0.36x
Somerset 1 0.44x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Lambeth in Surrey leads with 15 Pescotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 12.16x.

Place Total Index
Lambeth 15 12.16x
Blendworth 11 7857.14x
Leominster 9 1168.83x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 8 63.64x
North Chapel 8 2105.26x
Broadwater 7 127.97x
Hampstead London 7 31.77x
Monkwearmouth 7 173.70x
Bosham 6 983.61x
Catherington 6 937.50x
Subdeanery 6 331.49x
Westbourne 6 504.20x
Clapham 5 4166.67x
Ruswarp 4 256.41x
Liscard 3 53.38x
Liverpool 3 2.94x
Petersfield 3 375.00x
Sale 3 78.33x
St Michaelinthe Vale 3 200.00x
St Peter Port 3 38.71x
Brighton 2 4.16x
Chichester St Peter 2 1052.63x
Rumbolds Wyke 2 454.55x
Shoreditch London 2 3.26x
Arthuret 1 78.74x
Bathwick 1 39.68x
Clifton 1 7.13x
Collierley 1 53.48x
Compton 1 714.29x
Gamlingay 1 107.53x
Godalming 1 23.04x
Hastings St Mary 1 16.86x
Littlehampton 1 52.63x
Petworth 1 70.42x
Portsmouth 1 14.99x
Reading St Giles 1 9.61x
St Marythe Great 1 344.83x
Tangmere 1 1111.11x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Pescott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 9
Fanny 4
Sarah 4
Alice 3
Charlotte 3
Jane 3
Kate 3
Louisa 3
Agnes 2
Anne 2
Edith 2
Elizabeth 2
Ellen 2
Emma 2
Florence 2
Hannah 2
Henrietta 2
Margaret 2
Rosa 2
Adelaide 1
Ann 1
Annie 1
Blanche 1
Caroline 1
Chrystabel 1
Clara 1
Clare 1
E. 1
E.M. 1
Eliza 1
Elizath. 1
Ethel 1
Ida 1
Jessie 1
Lillian 1
Martha 1
Minnie 1
Nora 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Pescott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 12
William 7
Charles 5
John 5
Thomas 5
Alfred 3
Ernest 3
James 3
Joseph 3
Walter 3
Edward 2
Edwin 2
Frederick 2
Stephen 2
Ambrose 1
Arthur 1
David 1
Frank 1
Fredrick 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Hy. 1
Mark 1
Oriel 1
Percy 1
Richard 1
Wm. 1
Wm.H. 1

FAQ

Pescott surname: questions and answers

How common was the Pescott surname in 1881?

In 1881, 139 people were recorded with the Pescott surname. That placed it at #16,228 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Pescott surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 145 in 2016. That gives Pescott a modern rank of #24,293.

What does the Pescott map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Pescott bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.