NameCensus.

UK surname

Pewsey

In the 1881 census there were 78 people recorded with the Pewsey surname, ranking it #22,500 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 88, ranked #32,396, down from #22,500 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hillingdon (Hillingdon), Ickenham, Cowley, Lidiard Millicent and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Lancaster, Swansea and South Gloucestershire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Pewsey is 119 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 12.8%.

1881 census count

78

Ranked #22,500

Modern count

88

2016, ranked #32,396

Peak year

2002

119 bearers

Map years

3

1911 to 2006

Key insights

  • Pewsey had 78 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #22,500 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 88 in 2016, ranked #32,396.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 105 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Pewsey surname distribution map

The map shows where the Pewsey surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Pewsey surname density by area, 2006 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Pewsey over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 56 #23,235
1861 historical 31 #30,058
1881 historical 78 #22,500
1891 historical 81 #26,632
1901 historical 78 #25,500
1911 historical 105 #22,064
1997 modern 103 #26,498
1998 modern 117 #25,190
1999 modern 106 #26,885
2000 modern 114 #25,717
2001 modern 109 #26,059
2002 modern 119 #25,231
2003 modern 108 #26,486
2004 modern 108 #26,741
2005 modern 111 #26,260
2006 modern 110 #26,717
2007 modern 107 #27,557
2008 modern 102 #28,664
2009 modern 103 #29,127
2010 modern 105 #29,453
2011 modern 107 #28,979
2012 modern 93 #31,409
2013 modern 91 #32,020
2014 modern 91 #32,219
2015 modern 91 #32,153
2016 modern 88 #32,396

Geography

Back to top

Where Pewseys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hillingdon (Hillingdon), Ickenham, Cowley, Lidiard Millicent, London parishes, St Pancras and Edinburgh. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Lancaster, Swansea, South Gloucestershire and Isle of Wight. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hillingdon (Hillingdon), Ickenham, Cowley Middlesex (Exclusive Of London Districts)
2 Lidiard Millicent Wiltshire
3 London parishes London 1
4 St Pancras London (North Districts)
5 Edinburgh Edinburgh

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Lancaster 005 Lancaster
2 Swansea 012 Swansea
3 South Gloucestershire 011 South Gloucestershire
4 South Gloucestershire 012 South Gloucestershire
5 Isle of Wight 010 Isle of Wight

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Pewsey

These lists show first names that appear often with the Pewsey surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Pewsey

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Pewsey, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Pewsey surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Pewsey household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Pewsey is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Pewsey is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Pewsey falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Pewsey is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Pewsey, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Pewsey families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Pewsey surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 26 Pewseys recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.42x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 26 3.42x
Berkshire 15 26.27x
Hampshire 10 6.41x
Kent 7 2.70x
Midlothian 6 5.89x
Oxfordshire 6 12.77x
Buckinghamshire 2 4.35x
Essex 2 1.33x
Surrey 2 0.54x
Somerset 1 0.82x
Wiltshire 1 1.49x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Kensington London in Middlesex leads with 7 Pewseys recorded in 1881 and an index of 16.55x.

Place Total Index
Kensington London 7 16.55x
Reading St Giles 7 125.00x
Caversham 6 638.30x
Edinburgh St Cuthberts 6 14.63x
Kintbury 6 1363.64x
New Alresford 6 1500.00x
St Pancras London 6 9.80x
Beckenham 5 147.49x
Fulham London 5 45.33x
Fawley 4 816.33x
St Anne Soho London 4 92.17x
Hillingdon 2 82.30x
Wendover 2 400.00x
West Ham 2 6.03x
Bermondsey 1 4.42x
Bromley 1 25.25x
Clewer 1 42.74x
Corton Denham 1 1111.11x
Lambeth 1 1.51x
Latton 1 1428.57x
Lewisham 1 7.23x
Paddington London 1 3.58x
Reading St Mary 1 21.88x
St Margaret New Fish 1 3333.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Pewsey surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Eliza 5
Elizabeth 3
Emily 3
Alice 2
Ann 2
Charlotte 2
Edith 2
Jane 2
Lucy 2
Sarah 2
Amy 1
Annie 1
Elisabeth 1
Ellen 1
Emma 1
Leonora 1
Louisa 1
Mary 1
May 1
Percilla 1
Susanna 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Pewsey surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 10
Charles 3
Albert 2
Alfred 2
George 2
Henry 2
Thomas 2
Amos 1
Arthur 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Geoge 1
Isaac 1
James 1
Jno.H. 1
John 1
Joseph 1
Lloid 1
Perry 1
Rupert 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Pewsey households.

FAQ

Pewsey surname: questions and answers

How common was the Pewsey surname in 1881?

In 1881, 78 people were recorded with the Pewsey surname. That placed it at #22,500 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Pewsey surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 88 in 2016. That gives Pewsey a modern rank of #32,396.

What does the Pewsey map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Pewsey bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.