NameCensus.

UK surname

Pines

A surname referring to someone living near or associated with pine trees.

In the 1881 census there were 83 people recorded with the Pines surname, ranking it #21,808 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 123, ranked #27,115, down from #21,808 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Richmond, Kingston-on-Thames and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Salford, Liverpool and Gateshead.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Pines is 139 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 48.2%.

1881 census count

83

Ranked #21,808

Modern count

123

2016, ranked #27,115

Peak year

1911

139 bearers

Map years

6

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Pines had 83 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #21,808 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 123 in 2016, ranked #27,115.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 139 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Multicultural Inner Suburbs.

Pines surname distribution map

The map shows where the Pines surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Pines surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Pines over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 50 #24,274
1861 historical 100 #21,103
1881 historical 83 #21,808
1891 historical 90 #25,399
1901 historical 119 #20,624
1911 historical 139 #18,745
1997 modern 121 #24,019
1998 modern 119 #24,918
1999 modern 115 #25,620
2000 modern 116 #25,452
2001 modern 114 #25,344
2002 modern 119 #25,231
2003 modern 118 #25,146
2004 modern 119 #25,200
2005 modern 128 #24,076
2006 modern 119 #25,413
2007 modern 125 #24,987
2008 modern 124 #25,371
2009 modern 134 #24,711
2010 modern 130 #25,775
2011 modern 126 #26,060
2012 modern 112 #28,174
2013 modern 123 #26,974
2014 modern 124 #27,049
2015 modern 123 #27,088
2016 modern 123 #27,115

Geography

Back to top

Where Pines' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Richmond, Kingston-on-Thames, London parishes, Mortlake and Llandilo-Talybont. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Salford, Liverpool, Gateshead and Kingston upon Thames. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Richmond Surrey
2 Kingston-on-Thames Surrey
3 London parishes London 3
4 Mortlake Surrey
5 Llandilo-Talybont Glamorganshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Salford 010 Salford
2 Liverpool 022 Liverpool
3 Gateshead 008 Gateshead
4 Liverpool 010 Liverpool
5 Kingston upon Thames 017 Kingston upon Thames

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Pines

These lists show first names that appear often with the Pines surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Pines

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Pines, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Multicultural Inner Suburbs

Nationally, the Pines surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Multicultural Inner Suburbs, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Pines household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house many younger and middle-aged adults with children. All ethnic minorities, apart from those identifying as Pakistani or Bangladeshi, appear to be present in above average proportions. Affiliation to Christian religions is uncommon. Long-term disability rates are low, mirrored in limited provision of unpaid care. Privately rented terrace houses and flats are the norm. Managerial, professional and technical occupations are prevalent, and work is rarely part time. Many individuals have degree level qualifications. These areas form the inner suburbs of many of the UK’s towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Pines is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Pines is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Pines falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Pines is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - Other

This describes the area pattern most associated with Pines, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Pines

The surname "PINES" is believed to have originated in England, with roots dating back to the early medieval period. The name is derived from the Old English word "pin," meaning a pine tree or a hill covered with pine trees. This suggests that the earliest bearers of this surname likely lived near or worked in areas where pine trees were abundant.

One of the earliest recorded instances of the name can be found in the Domesday Book of 1086, where it appears as "de Pines," indicating that the family held lands or property in a location known for its pine trees. The use of the Norman-French preposition "de" further suggests that the name was already established by the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066.

During the 13th and 14th centuries, the name appeared in various forms, such as "de la Pyne," "atte Pyne," and "Pyne," reflecting the evolution of the English language and changes in spelling conventions. These variations often referred to specific locations or landmarks associated with pine trees.

Notable historical figures with the surname "PINES" include Sir Thomas Pines (c. 1460-1535), a prominent English courtier and Member of Parliament during the reign of Henry VIII. Another notable individual was Elizabeth Pines (c. 1555-1634), an English landowner and philanthropist who bequeathed significant portions of her estate to charitable causes.

In the 16th century, the name appears in records related to the English settlement of North America. John Pines (c. 1570-1623) was among the early settlers of Virginia and is recorded as having been granted land in the newly established colony.

The surname "PINES" also has connections to various place names in England, such as Pines Park in Staffordshire and Pine Wood in Berkshire, both of which likely derived their names from the presence of pine trees in those areas.

Other notable individuals with the surname "PINES" include Robert Pines (1720-1788), an English landscape architect known for his work on several prominent estates, and Reverend William Pines (1784-1861), a Church of England clergyman and author of several religious texts.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Pines families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Pines surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Surrey leads with 37 Pines' recorded in 1881 and an index of 9.49x.

County Total Index
Surrey 37 9.49x
Middlesex 26 3.25x
Essex 6 3.80x
Kent 3 1.10x
Lancashire 2 0.21x
Derbyshire 1 0.80x
Dorset 1 1.90x
Gloucestershire 1 0.64x
Lincolnshire 1 0.78x
Northumberland 1 0.84x
Staffordshire 1 0.37x
Sussex 1 0.74x
Yorkshire 1 0.13x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Kingston On Thames in Surrey leads with 10 Pines' recorded in 1881 and an index of 106.84x.

Place Total Index
Kingston On Thames 10 106.84x
Richmond 10 183.15x
Rotherhithe 9 91.09x
Leyton 6 220.59x
Mortlake 6 344.83x
Bromley London 4 22.73x
Stanwell 4 677.97x
Twickenham 4 116.62x
Poplar London 3 19.87x
Tottenham 3 23.55x
Ealing 2 27.97x
Isleworth 2 56.18x
Newington 2 6.77x
Oldham 2 6.53x
St Pancras London 2 3.11x
Bedlington 1 25.19x
Charlton Next Woolwich 1 35.09x
Eastbourne 1 16.10x
Feltham 1 125.00x
Gloucester Longford St 1 476.19x
Greenwich 1 7.86x
Kingstonupon Hull 1 156.25x
Mayfield 1 294.12x
Measham 1 217.39x
Minster In Sheppey 1 22.12x
New Brentford 1 238.10x
Portland 1 35.46x
Timberland 1 714.29x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Pines surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 4
Eliza 3
Mary 3
Ada 2
Elizabeth 2
Emma 2
Florence 2
Alice 1
Amy 1
Angnes 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Ellen 1
Fanny 1
Hannah 1
Harriett 1
Jane 1
Jessie 1
Leven 1
Lily 1
Louisa 1
Margaret 1
Matilda 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Pines surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
James 5
John 5
William 5
Henry 4
Alfred 3
George 3
Philip 3
Thomas 3
Edward 2
Frederick 2
Albert 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Ernest 1
Frank 1
J. 1
Mathew 1
Orlando 1
Richard 1
Saml. 1
Sidney 1

FAQ

Pines surname: questions and answers

How common was the Pines surname in 1881?

In 1881, 83 people were recorded with the Pines surname. That placed it at #21,808 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Pines surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 123 in 2016. That gives Pines a modern rank of #27,115.

What does the Pines surname mean?

A surname referring to someone living near or associated with pine trees.

What does the Pines map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Pines bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.