NameCensus.

UK surname

Pover

In the 1881 census there were 257 people recorded with the Pover surname, ranking it #10,861 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 294, ranked #14,953, down from #10,861 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Manchester, Runcorn and Liverpool. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Lancaster, Adur and Salford.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Pover is 357 in 2004. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 14.4%.

1881 census count

257

Ranked #10,861

Modern count

294

2016, ranked #14,953

Peak year

2004

357 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Pover had 257 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #10,861 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 294 in 2016, ranked #14,953.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 330 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Pover surname distribution map

The map shows where the Pover surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Pover surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Pover over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 185 #11,077
1861 historical 172 #13,619
1881 historical 257 #10,861
1891 historical 261 #12,337
1901 historical 267 #12,587
1911 historical 330 #10,669
1997 modern 316 #13,080
1998 modern 337 #12,859
1999 modern 342 #12,829
2000 modern 333 #12,999
2001 modern 342 #12,566
2002 modern 352 #12,557
2003 modern 355 #12,285
2004 modern 357 #12,272
2005 modern 329 #12,966
2006 modern 316 #13,402
2007 modern 322 #13,382
2008 modern 325 #13,406
2009 modern 336 #13,345
2010 modern 341 #13,477
2011 modern 328 #13,730
2012 modern 314 #14,063
2013 modern 310 #14,403
2014 modern 308 #14,571
2015 modern 305 #14,579
2016 modern 294 #14,953

Geography

Back to top

Where Povers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Manchester, Runcorn, Liverpool, Frodsham and Bidstone. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Lancaster, Adur, Salford, Cheshire West and Chester and Bolton. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Manchester Lancashire
2 Runcorn Cheshire
3 Liverpool Lancashire
4 Frodsham Cheshire
5 Bidstone Cheshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Lancaster 001 Lancaster
2 Adur 001 Adur
3 Salford 017 Salford
4 Cheshire West and Chester 025 Cheshire West and Chester
5 Bolton 012 Bolton

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Pover

These lists show first names that appear often with the Pover surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Pover

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Pover, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Pover surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Pover household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Pover is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Pover is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Pover falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Pover is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Pover, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Pover families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Pover surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 102 Povers recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.42x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 102 3.42x
Cheshire 57 10.26x
Staffordshire 39 4.59x
Kent 17 1.98x
Dorset 11 6.66x
Flintshire 6 8.87x
Yorkshire 6 0.24x
Durham 4 0.53x
Hampshire 4 0.78x
Shropshire 4 1.84x
Cornwall 3 1.05x
Devon 2 0.38x
Middlesex 1 0.04x
Northamptonshire 1 0.42x
Surrey 1 0.08x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stoke Upon Trent in Staffordshire leads with 19 Povers recorded in 1881 and an index of 21.09x.

Place Total Index
Stoke Upon Trent 19 21.09x
Everton 14 14.71x
Sutton In Runcorn 13 4062.50x
Faversham 11 134.31x
Salford 11 12.52x
Liverpool 10 5.51x
Kirkdale 8 15.92x
Openshaw 8 57.18x
West Derby 8 9.16x
Ashton Under Lyne 7 10.72x
Bootle Cum Linacre 7 29.51x
Barton Upon Irwell 6 26.69x
Clifton In York 6 114.94x
Helsby 6 857.14x
Hope 6 178.04x
Keele 6 666.67x
Runcorn 6 46.84x
Wolstanton Knutton 6 115.61x
Birkenhead 5 11.29x
Broughton In Salford 5 18.31x
Burslem 5 20.54x
Chester St John Baptist 5 50.05x
Manchester 5 3.72x
Melcombe Regis 5 72.99x
Sound 5 2083.33x
Byers Green 4 189.57x
Portsea 4 3.96x
Tonbridge 4 12.92x
Wimborne Minster 4 149.81x
Parr 3 28.09x
Pickton 3 3000.00x
Tarvin Pryors Hayes 3 405.41x
Upton In Chester 3 483.87x
Whitchurch Alkington 3 2727.27x
Budock 2 93.46x
Chorlton On Medlock 2 4.22x
Elton In Chester 2 1176.47x
Frodsham 2 93.02x
Little Bolton 2 5.21x
Tormoham 2 9.02x
Blackburn 1 1.26x
Caverswall 1 22.62x
Chatham 1 4.23x
Clapham 1 3.18x
Constantine 1 60.24x
Frodsham Lordship 1 106.38x
Golborne Bellow 1 1428.57x
Hammersmith London 1 1.61x
Handsworth 1 4.78x
Hankelow 1 526.32x
Hapsford 1 1666.67x
Hardingstone 1 44.25x
Haydock 1 19.42x
Huyton With Roby 1 28.57x
Minster In Sheppey 1 7.03x
Newcastle Under Lyme 1 6.65x
Toxteth Park 1 0.99x
Walton On Hill 1 6.18x
Wavertree 1 10.46x
Weymouth 1 31.95x
Whitchurch Broughall 1 454.55x
Winfrith Newburgh 1 120.48x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Pover surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 19
Sarah 12
Elizabeth 9
Eliza 8
Margaret 8
Emma 6
Annie 5
Hannah 5
Jane 5
Alice 4
Emily 4
Ann 3
Anne 3
Clara 3
Ellen 3
Fanny 3
Amelia 2
Esther 2
Harriet 2
Harriett 2
Louisa 2
Lydia 2
A.M. 1
C.A. 1
Christina 1
Dinah 1
E.A. 1
Edith 1
Eleanor 1
Elenor 1
Elimy 1
Elsie 1
Ethel 1
Florence 1
Francis 1
George 1
Gertrude 1
Helen 1
Kate 1
Liley 1
Lily 1
Lizzie 1
Lucy 1
M. 1
Margret 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Ruth 1
Susan 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Pover surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 18
Thomas 18
William 15
George 7
Edward 6
Joseph 6
James 4
Samuel 4
Albert 3
Frederick 3
Harry 3
Richard 3
Charles 2
Edwin 2
Herbert 2
Alexander 1
Alfred 1
Artho 1
Chas. 1
Christopher 1
Denis 1
Donald 1
Edgar 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Frederic 1
Henry 1
Ishmael 1
Jno. 1
Peter 1
Robert 1
Sidney 1
Stephen 1
Thos. 1
W.C. 1

FAQ

Pover surname: questions and answers

How common was the Pover surname in 1881?

In 1881, 257 people were recorded with the Pover surname. That placed it at #10,861 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Pover surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 294 in 2016. That gives Pover a modern rank of #14,953.

What does the Pover map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Pover bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.