NameCensus.

UK surname

Powys

In the 1881 census there were 101 people recorded with the Powys surname, ranking it #19,636 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 93, ranked #31,945, down from #19,636 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Paddington, London parishes and St George, Hanover Square, Buckingham Palace. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Powys is 101 in 1881. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 7.9%.

1881 census count

101

Ranked #19,636

Modern count

93

2016, ranked #31,945

Peak year

1881

101 bearers

Map years

1

1881 to 1881

Key insights

  • Powys had 101 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #19,636 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 93 in 2016, ranked #31,945.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 101 in 1881.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Powys surname distribution map

The map shows where the Powys surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Powys surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Powys over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 78 #19,840
1861 historical 96 #21,648
1881 historical 101 #19,636
1891 historical 94 #24,820
1901 historical 91 #23,921
1911 historical 82 #24,635
1997 modern 79 #29,672
1998 modern 73 #30,681
1999 modern 75 #30,661
2000 modern 70 #31,180
2001 modern 70 #31,016
2002 modern 74 #31,048
2003 modern 80 #30,425
2004 modern 79 #30,799
2005 modern 79 #30,950
2006 modern 82 #30,933
2007 modern 81 #31,408
2008 modern 77 #32,181
2009 modern 86 #31,612
2010 modern 86 #32,081
2011 modern 93 #31,169
2012 modern 94 #31,258
2013 modern 96 #31,381
2014 modern 98 #31,370
2015 modern 98 #31,342
2016 modern 93 #31,945

Geography

Back to top

Where Powys' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Paddington, London parishes, St George, Hanover Square, Buckingham Palace, Kidderminster and Whitchurch. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Paddington London (West Districts)
2 London parishes London 3
3 St George, Hanover Square, Buckingham Palace London (West Districts)
4 Kidderminster Worcestershire
5 Whitchurch Berkshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Powys

These lists show first names that appear often with the Powys surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Powys

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Powys, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Powys surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Powys household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Powys is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Powys is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Powys, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Powys families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Powys surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 30 Powys' recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.05x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 30 3.05x
Shropshire 13 15.27x
Herefordshire 10 24.76x
Surrey 9 1.88x
Dorset 7 10.83x
Hampshire 6 2.97x
Oxfordshire 6 9.86x
Glamorgan 5 2.91x
Hertfordshire 2 2.95x
Kent 2 0.60x
Somerset 2 1.26x
Wiltshire 2 2.30x
Yorkshire 2 0.20x
Berkshire 1 1.35x
Leicestershire 1 0.92x
Northamptonshire 1 1.08x
Staffordshire 1 0.30x
Sussex 1 0.60x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Kensington London in Middlesex leads with 10 Powys' recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.26x.

Place Total Index
Kensington London 10 18.26x
Pontesbury 8 769.23x
Fordington 7 503.60x
Tooting Graveney 7 522.39x
Holdenhurst 6 113.21x
St George Hanover 6 46.66x
Cilybebill 5 769.23x
Hereford All Sts 5 270.27x
Lyonshall 5 1724.14x
Paddington London 5 13.80x
Ludlow St Lawrence 4 236.69x
Cowley 3 157.89x
St Marylebone London 3 5.70x
Stadhampton 3 2307.69x
Acton 2 34.66x
Putney 2 44.54x
St Pancras London 2 2.52x
Walcot 2 23.67x
Winterslow 2 689.66x
Eastbourne 1 13.09x
Folkestone 1 15.34x
Gate Fulford 1 43.86x
Harrow 1 66.23x
Harrow On The Hill 1 50.76x
Headingley Cum Burley 1 15.92x
Old Windsor 1 116.28x
Rickmansworth 1 53.48x
Sawbridgeworth 1 97.09x
Stoughton 1 2000.00x
Thorpe Achurch 1 2000.00x
Tonbridge 1 8.25x
Upper Penn 1 120.48x
Wem 1 78.74x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Powys surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Powys surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Charles 5
John 5
Henry 3
Arthur 2
Chas. 2
Edward 2
George 2
Richard 2
William 2
Aaron 1
Alfred 1
Bransby 1
Chas.W. 1
Edmund 1
Edwin 1
Evelyn 1
Francis 1
Herbert 1
Horace 1
Leopold 1
Littleton 1
Merryn 1
Moses 1
Percy 1
Robert 1
Stephen 1
Theodore 1
Thomas 1
Thos.P. 1
Vernon 1
Walter 1
Warwick 1

FAQ

Powys surname: questions and answers

How common was the Powys surname in 1881?

In 1881, 101 people were recorded with the Powys surname. That placed it at #19,636 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Powys surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 93 in 2016. That gives Powys a modern rank of #31,945.

What does the Powys map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Powys bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.