NameCensus.

UK surname

Purden

In the 1881 census there were 149 people recorded with the Purden surname, ranking it #15,551 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 75, ranked #33,377, down from #15,551 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Radford Semele, Govan Combination and Sutton Coldfield. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Purden is 163 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 49.7%.

1881 census count

149

Ranked #15,551

Modern count

75

2016, ranked #33,377

Peak year

1901

163 bearers

Map years

5

1861 to 1911

Key insights

  • Purden had 149 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,551 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 75 in 2016, ranked #33,377.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 163 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Purden surname distribution map

The map shows where the Purden surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Purden surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Purden over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 96 #17,594
1861 historical 112 #19,279
1881 historical 149 #15,551
1891 historical 156 #17,842
1901 historical 163 #17,205
1911 historical 123 #20,128
1997 modern 98 #27,179
1998 modern 90 #28,920
1999 modern 94 #28,593
2000 modern 80 #30,139
2001 modern 77 #30,277
2002 modern 78 #30,601
2003 modern 72 #31,281
2004 modern 77 #31,024
2005 modern 76 #31,267
2006 modern 74 #31,850
2007 modern 76 #31,966
2008 modern 77 #32,181
2009 modern 86 #31,612
2010 modern 84 #32,289
2011 modern 85 #32,127
2012 modern 79 #32,966
2013 modern 83 #32,813
2014 modern 80 #33,133
2015 modern 76 #33,351
2016 modern 75 #33,377

Geography

Back to top

Where Purdens are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Radford Semele, Govan Combination, Sutton Coldfield, Glasgow and Birmingham Town: Aston. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Radford Semele Warwickshire
2 Govan Combination Lanark
3 Sutton Coldfield Warwickshire
4 Glasgow Lanark
5 Birmingham Town: Aston Warwickshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Purden

These lists show first names that appear often with the Purden surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Purden

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Purden, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Purden surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Purden household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Purden is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Purden is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Purden, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Purden families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Purden surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 31 Purdens recorded in 1881 and an index of 8.46x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 31 8.46x
Lanarkshire 20 4.26x
Nottinghamshire 18 9.19x
Yorkshire 15 1.04x
Middlesex 13 0.89x
Devon 7 2.31x
Surrey 7 0.99x
Lancashire 6 0.35x
Stirlingshire 6 11.19x
West Lothian 6 27.41x
Cheshire 5 1.56x
Renfrewshire 4 3.55x
Berkshire 3 2.75x
Hampshire 2 0.67x
Angus 1 0.74x
Bedfordshire 1 1.33x
Lincolnshire 1 0.43x
Midlothian 1 0.51x
Perthshire 1 1.53x
Roxburghshire 1 3.80x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Birmingham in Warwickshire leads with 17 Purdens recorded in 1881 and an index of 13.92x.

Place Total Index
Birmingham 17 13.92x
Barony 12 10.09x
Annesley 8 1081.08x
Paddington London 8 14.97x
Radford Semele 8 2857.14x
East Retford 7 411.76x
Plymouth Charles The 7 52.51x
Alva 6 234.38x
Carriden 6 606.06x
Kimberworth 6 75.09x
Foggathorpe 5 8333.33x
Edgbaston 4 35.21x
Toxteth Park 4 6.85x
Battersea 3 5.61x
Birkenhead 3 11.73x
Govan 3 2.58x
Hamilton 3 22.88x
Hucknall Torkard 3 60.36x
Kensington London 3 3.71x
Kilbarchan 3 87.72x
Newington 3 5.59x
East Kilbride 2 99.50x
Eling 2 66.23x
Garforth 2 181.82x
Hulme 2 5.55x
Nantwich 2 53.62x
Reading St Lawrence 2 85.84x
Aston 1 0.99x
Eastwood 1 14.41x
Gate Fulford 1 29.76x
Islington London 1 0.71x
Kelso 1 38.17x
Kirriemuir 1 30.12x
Logie 1 42.74x
Luton 1 7.67x
North Leith 1 11.10x
Reading St Mary 1 11.44x
Richmond 1 10.08x
Solihull 1 38.02x
St George Hanover 1 5.27x
Wrawby 1 158.73x
York St John Micklegate 1 285.71x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Purden surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Purden surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 6
William 6
Thomas 5
Robert 4
Charles 3
James 3
Joseph 3
Arthur 2
Edward 2
Henry 2
Albert 1
Clifford 1
David 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Geo. 1
George 1
Jes. 1
Jesse 1
Josh.A. 1
Phillip 1
Thos.L. 1
Walling 1
Walter 1
Wellington 1

FAQ

Purden surname: questions and answers

How common was the Purden surname in 1881?

In 1881, 149 people were recorded with the Purden surname. That placed it at #15,551 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Purden surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 75 in 2016. That gives Purden a modern rank of #33,377.

What does the Purden map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Purden bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.