NameCensus.

UK surname

Purt

In the 1881 census there were 108 people recorded with the Purt surname, ranking it #18,888 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 110, ranked #29,225, down from #18,888 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to King's Lynn St Margaret, Hinckley (incl. Hydes Pastures) and St Margaret. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Bournemouth, Basingstoke and Deane and Waverley.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Purt is 151 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 1.9%.

1881 census count

108

Ranked #18,888

Modern count

110

2016, ranked #29,225

Peak year

1911

151 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Purt had 108 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,888 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 110 in 2016, ranked #29,225.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 151 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Purt surname distribution map

The map shows where the Purt surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Purt surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Purt over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 34 #27,194
1861 historical 51 #27,498
1881 historical 108 #18,888
1891 historical 132 #19,976
1901 historical 131 #19,552
1911 historical 151 #17,797
1997 modern 142 #21,856
1998 modern 142 #22,406
1999 modern 138 #22,983
2000 modern 131 #23,672
2001 modern 130 #23,457
2002 modern 128 #24,150
2003 modern 126 #24,146
2004 modern 127 #24,224
2005 modern 124 #24,529
2006 modern 117 #25,695
2007 modern 119 #25,747
2008 modern 119 #26,067
2009 modern 114 #27,363
2010 modern 111 #28,509
2011 modern 109 #28,653
2012 modern 110 #28,514
2013 modern 112 #28,675
2014 modern 113 #28,779
2015 modern 117 #27,982
2016 modern 110 #29,225

Geography

Back to top

Where Purts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around King's Lynn St Margaret, Hinckley (incl. Hydes Pastures), St Margaret, Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars and Acle. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Bournemouth, Basingstoke and Deane, Waverley, St Edmundsbury and Shropshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 King's Lynn St Margaret Norfolk
2 Hinckley (incl. Hydes Pastures) Leicestershire
3 St Margaret Leicestershire
4 Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars Leicestershire
5 Acle Norfolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Bournemouth 003 Bournemouth
2 Basingstoke and Deane 014 Basingstoke and Deane
3 Waverley 017 Waverley
4 St Edmundsbury 003 St Edmundsbury
5 Shropshire 001 Shropshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Purt

These lists show first names that appear often with the Purt surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Purt

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Purt, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Purt surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Purt household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Purt is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Purt is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Purt falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Purt is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Purt, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Purt families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Purt surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 30 Purts recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.52x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 30 18.52x
Leicestershire 20 17.12x
Surrey 16 3.12x
Kent 14 3.89x
Middlesex 11 1.04x
Yorkshire 8 0.77x
Hampshire 4 1.85x
Dorset 2 2.89x
Suffolk 2 1.56x
Somerset 1 0.59x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Acle in Norfolk leads with 10 Purts recorded in 1881 and an index of 3030.30x.

Place Total Index
Acle 10 3030.30x
Great Yarmouth 10 74.52x
Hinckley 10 361.01x
Knighton 9 1363.64x
Croydon 7 24.57x
Gillingham 7 94.47x
Gravesend 7 230.26x
Manningham 7 54.43x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 5 102.88x
Islington London 4 3.92x
Portsea 4 9.45x
Richmond 4 55.63x
Tooting Graveney 4 279.72x
Tottenham 4 23.84x
Kettlestone 2 2857.14x
Sherborne 2 98.04x
Azerley 1 400.00x
Bromley London 1 4.31x
Camberwell 1 1.49x
Downham Market 1 90.09x
Leicester St Margaret 1 3.51x
Lowestoft 1 16.50x
Norwich St Peter Mancroft 1 123.46x
Poplar London 1 5.03x
St George Hanover 1 7.27x
Terrington St Clement 1 136.99x
Thornham Magna 1 1000.00x
Yeovil 1 28.99x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Purt surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 6
Elizabeth 4
Ellen 4
Louisa 4
Alice 3
Emily 3
Sarah 3
Amy 2
Charlotte 2
Emma 2
Florence 2
Maria 2
Rhoda 2
Ada 1
Ann 1
Caroline 1
Catherin 1
Clara 1
Edith 1
Eleanor 1
Eliza 1
Grace 1
Hannah 1
Harriett 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Kate 1
Lillian 1
Rose 1
Susanah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Purt surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 7
George 6
John 6
James 5
Charles 4
Frederick 3
Thomas 3
Fredk. 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Aubery 1
Benjamin 1
David 1
Eastwood 1
Edward 1
Hazlet 1
Henry 1
Jacob 1
Marie 1
Noah 1
Robert 1
Simeon 1
Thos. 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Purt surname: questions and answers

How common was the Purt surname in 1881?

In 1881, 108 people were recorded with the Purt surname. That placed it at #18,888 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Purt surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 110 in 2016. That gives Purt a modern rank of #29,225.

What does the Purt map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Purt bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.